Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Federalist v anti-federalist
Pros and cons of anti federalists
Economic factors of the civil war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Federalist v anti-federalist
The United States of America has always disputed over the amount power the federal government had in regards to what the federal government could control through laws. Federalist and Anti-Federalist argued for years because they could not agree if the United States should or should not have a powerful central government (Kennedy). Even after those parties transformed into different parties, the continuous debate over the amount of power the federal government should have continued. The Civil War was fought over slavery and Southern States seceded from the nation to display dominance over the federal government and eradicate laws made by the federal government the South did not support, such as those regarding slavery (Causes of the Civil War). …show more content…
President Lincoln had many objecters of the draft during the civil war (Kennedy, 328). The union was not fully united during the war, and people had issues with the government. Lincoln did not want fight a war, and attempted to unify the union with his ten percent plan. 1863 he issued a Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction which would pardon Confederates who would swear to the union, and states only needed ten percent of their voting population to take an oath of loyalty to the union in order to rejoin (Alchin). This lenient plan shows the federal government did not want to increase their power over the states during the civil war, but that would change later on in the war and after the war ended. Attempting to fund the war Lincoln tried to raise taxes twice, but the people resisted, and in response Lincoln had to authorize legal tender called “greenbacks” which no one could refuse since the currency was standardized for the nation (Flaherty, Edward). Lincoln did have to exert some of his power over the people in the union, during the war, revealing how the federal government had little power before, since Lincoln had to increase it. President Lincoln also signed a bill in 1861 that implemented the first Federal income tax (History the First Income Tax). Lincoln signing the bill caused the federal government to increase in size and power it yielded over the people, in order …show more content…
Economic historians think the war costed the United States 6.6 billion dollars in 1860, without inflation (Ross, Michael). The large loss after the Civil War was from all of the damages, since the war was fought on United States Soil. As well as the cost of the war, the South’s economy was in ruins because of devastating military damages, and the economy previously relied on slavery for free labor, thus the economy plummeted after the war ended leading to poverty in the upcountry (Fonner, 17). By reason of Lincoln freeing slaves in the South, and the South now being under Lincoln’s control, African American women and children were not required to work (American's Reconstruction). This eventually lead to less labor, meaning less profit in the southern economy, harming the economy even more making the South
On April 12, 1861, Abraham Lincoln declared to the South that, the only reason that separate the country is the idea of slavery, if people could solve that problem then there will be no war. Was that the main reason that started the Civil war? or it was just a small goal that hides the real big reason to start the war behind it. Yet, until this day, people are still debating whether slavery is the main reason of the Civil war. However, there are a lot of facts that help to state the fact that slavery was the main reason of the war. These evidences can relate to many things in history, but they all connect to the idea of slavery.
Before the start of the Civil War, conflict had been brewing between the states of the North and South. The election of Abraham Lincoln did not enhance the situation at all. Lincoln was a noted abolitionist and he wanted to abate the expansion of slavery into the Western states. The Southern states saw this as an infraction to their way of life by controlling their economy. How could the Northern states regulate the Southern states? The economy of the North was very different than the South. Especially since slavery was vital to farmers in the planting and harvesting the crops. Secession was on the horizon and Lincoln knew he had to do something to prevent this. To help build the Union Army, Lincoln called for 75,000 volunteers to serve for 90 days. Every state was asked to fill a quota based on its population. This did not help Lincoln’s and only hurt the Union cause. This only enraged the Southern state more and seceding for the Union was becoming a reality.
Near the end of the Antebellum Era, tensions and sectionalism increased as the states argued over what was constitutional. The South had later seceded from the United States and had become the Confederacy of America while the North had remained as the Union. The South had fully supported states’ rights while the north had strongly disapproved it. However, westward expansion, southern anger with the abolitionists, and the secession of the South that had destroyed the feeling of unity in the country because of the disagreement over slavery had been the main factors to the cause of the Civil War. Therefore, since slavery was the primary reason for the discontent in the country, it had been the primary cause of the Civil War.
I. Beginning of the War 1. What is the difference between a. and a. When and where did the war begin? (443) The war began on April 12, 1861 at a U.S. fort on an island guarding Charleston Harbor, called Fort Sumter.
The Ratification of the constitution had caused a debate between the federalists and antifederalists. It was the outcome of the the articles of confederation. There was a need for a strong government
The Civil War had a huge effect on the South’s economy. To begin, the Civil War caused billions of dollars of damage and most of it was in the South. The destruction left the South’s economy in a state of collapse. About two-thirds of the transportation system lay in ruin and many bridges were destroyed and miles of railroad were twisted and rendered useless. The Civil War also created bitter feelings among defeated Southerners that lasted for generations. Even more, the Civil War brought an end to slavery so rich Southerner’s couldn’t rely on large-scale farming. The Southerners blamed the North for a lack of industry and manufacturing, which led to more industry in the South. The Civil War had ruined many farms and land, causing there to
The Civil War was an inevitable conflict that was induced due to variations among North and South societies, slavery, and politics. American society grew to be more complex, and with the increased amount of sectional discord, compromise did not have the ability to solve the problems that were causing the divide of the United States. Three components that made contributions to the inevitability of war included sectionalism, the Compromise of 1850, and secession. Combined, these sparked a heavy dissension economically and between social classes, resulting in war.
The Union continued to be recognized as a sovereign nation throughout the war so they were able to keep trading with other countries and was better able to support their economy. The South was able to maintain a relationship with Britain at the beginning of the war due to their massive amounts of cotton exports. However, the South severely underestimated the British’s reliance on their cotton and soon lost their main trading partner putting them with only local materials and resources to finance the war. The North was also far more industrialized than their Southern counterparts. While the Confederacy relied on agriculture to support their economy, the Union relied on both agriculture and industrialization. Most factories in the United States were located in the North giving them a greater advantage when it came to supplying their own materials and left the Confederacy with no where to create weapons and military necessities. Due to the unstable wartime economy, both the North and the South suffered from bouts of inflation. The South, however, had a rate of inflation upwards of 5,000%, “the Confederate government obtained three-quarters of its revenues from the printing press… and less than two percent from taxes” (McPherson 439) The North suffered
Union victory in the Civil War had brought about the abolishment of slavery and the emancipation of four million blacks. These former slaves were largely unskilled, illiterate, and without property or money. Various welfare agencies, such as the Freedmen’s Bureau, were formed to help former slaves adapt to life outside of slavery and to divide up confiscated Confederate land amongst former slaves. This was crucial because in the South, landownership was the key to freedom, and this land was promised to the former slaves by the Union Army. President Andrew Johnson, a pro-white politician from Tennessee, ordered all land to be returned to its former owners, stripping the former slaves from their bid to fiscal independence. He was also an vehement
Not everyone supported abolition nor slavery. Like mentioned before, the civil war started with preserving the nation in a bloody conflict between the Union and the Confederacy in which the Union had more of an advantage against the Confederates. However, the conflict over preserving the Union later turned into a conflict about slavery. “War, it has been said, is the midlife of revolution. And the Civil War produced far-reaching changes in American life. The most dramatic of these was the destruction of slavery, the central institution of southern society” (Foner pg.529). It turns out that the south did not want to preserve the Union, nor did they want to end slavery. The north did not want to deal with anything that involved with slavery,
After the Civil War there were some hardships faced by the South.One hardship was that the South's wealth decreased by 48% according to document eight. In document one in 1860 the south had a good amount of wealthy states. But, in 1880 which is after the Civil War all of the Southern states be the least wealthy states.The reason for the major decrease was because after the Civil War there were no slaves.Therefore, making the money drop because most of the money in the South was made by slave labor and by selling slaves. Another hardship in the south was that there was a decrease in agriculture. According to document eight there was a 50 percent decrease in cotton, a 44 percent decrease in corn, and a 64 percent decrease in hay.This was a hardship because agriculture was one of the main source of employment in the south. Also this is a hardship because cotton the south's main source of money was decreasing. In addition, during the civil war there was 260,000 lives lost making the labor force in the south decrease by a third. Finally a hardship in the South was that all of the towns, cities, roads, bridges, mill, and factories were destroyed according to document two. This was a hardship because that meant that the south did not h...
As our National Anthem goes, America should be the “The land of the free”, and our Constitution calls us “equal”. During the time frame of the Civil War, however, America was the complete opposite of free. As a whole, we struggled with finding a solid conclusion to end slavery and the unfair treatment of African-Americans who were in and entered America. Even after the Civil War, discrimination and segregation were still major issues that plagued our past society. But as for the Civil War, America was truly not the “Land of the Free”.
The Civil War was an important war over the freedom of slaves in the U.S.. The Civil War is well known for being caused by the issue of slavery, but it is really a combination of different events and actions that caused tensions to rise throughout the country. The economic and political issues in the U.S., along with certain actions caused the Civil war, which is one of the United States’s worst wars. All in all, the Civil War was one of the most devastating wars for our country as a whole, and the process of rebuilding would take years and is no easy job.
The Civil War was a huge turning point in the lives of a large portion of the nation’s African Americans. It served as a source for many firsts for their society. Following the war, they were able to do many things that they were unable to before, such as enlist in the army, vote, and acquire freedom. Through self-acclaimed emancipation, war involvement, and equality within the army, African American soldiers in the Civil War were able to positively influence their future in a racist-infused society.
The Civil War has been viewed as the unavoidable eruption of a conflict that had been simmering for decades between the industrial North and the agricultural South. Roark et al. (p. 507) speak of the two regions’ respective “labor systems,” which in the eyes of both contemporaries were the most salient evidence of two irreconcilable worldviews. Yet the economies of the two regions were complementary to some extent, in terms of the exchange of goods and capital; the Civil War did not arise because of economic competition between the North and South over markets, for instance. The collision course that led to the Civil War did not have its basis in pure economics as much as in the perceptions of Northerners and Southerners of the economies of the respective regions in political and social terms. The first lens for this was what I call the nation’s ‘charter’—the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, the documents spelling out the nation’s core ideology. Despite their inconsistencies, they provided a standard against which the treatment and experience of any or all groups of people residing within the United States could be evaluated (Native Americans, however, did not count). Secondly, these documents had installed a form of government that to a significant degree promised representation of each individual citizen. It was understood that this only possible through aggregation, and so population would be a major source of political power in the United States. This is where economics intersected with politics: the economic system of the North encouraged (albeit for the purposes of exploitation) immigration, whereas that of the South did not. Another layer of the influence of economics in politics was that the prosperity of ...