Child Socialization Essay

1415 Words3 Pages

“Parenting is emotionally and intellectually draining, and it often requires professional sacrifice and serious financial hardship” (McLanahan and Sandefur 98). Indeed, parenting is tough. In most cases, children live in one of the two main family types, a nuclear or single parent family. To ensure a bright future for the nation in the years to come, children must grow up in an environment that is conducive for optimal development. After all, they are the next generation. But exactly which family type would be best for a child? In which family type would a child best learn morals, be prepared for the outside world and receive the items needed? Many people have concluded that a nuclear family is more beneficial for a child when compared to …show more content…

“Gender roles are thought to be products of nurture or how individuals are brought up. They are casually constructed” (Haslanger 98). In essence, socializing a child in gender roles is simply a matter of teaching him or her to conform to the gendered norms appropriate to a community. Many people argue that socialization is better taught in a nuclear family because a father can best teach a boy how to act just as a mother can best teach a girl. For instance, a father can best teach a boy how to dress and be a gentleman whereas a mother can best teach a girl how to dress and behave ladylike. Hence, this is why critics say that both parents are adequate in teaching gender socialization. However, these critics also ignore the other agents of socialization. Nancy Chodorow, a former Sociology Professor at the University of California, points out that the community, schools and media play a role in socializing a child with respect to gender roles (214). Therefore, it is apparent that the family is not the only way for a child to be socialized in gender roles. For instance, if a man within the community decides to approach a boy and tell him that his dress code is not suitable subsequently offering advice on what he should wear, the child becomes further acquainted with gender socialization. Even by watching …show more content…

Hetherington and Arasteh, both renowned psychologists who specialize in child development, note, “Necessities such as food, clothes and school supplies must be made available to a child…. It comes as no surprise that on average, approximately twenty percent of a family’s income is spent on the children.” (39). Because of this, a child’s expense is costly. Some critics believe that a nuclear family is superior because there are two parents who can usually provide two incomes, as opposed to the single parent family where there is only the income of the sole parent. In most cases, this is true; the income of nuclear families tends to be more than the income of single parent families. However, these critics do not take into account the alternative means most single parents use to acquire the necessary items their child needs. Hetherington and Arasteh adds, “But there are many ways for parents to provide for children without reaching into their pockets….Each community has certain programs which accommodate and make provisions for people who need help.” (39). Basically, this is suggesting that single parent families can receive help from an institution like social services, which can offer food store and school clothing vouchers to people in need. This will alleviate single parent families food cost as well as clothing expenses. Similarly, in terms of school supplies, the

Open Document