Charles Darwin's Theory Of Biological Criminology

765 Words2 Pages

originates in the brain, and was a major step forward for psychology. Amongst this scientific advancement, the birth and refinement of the scientific method was fundamental to modern biological criminology.

One of the most ground-breaking applications of the scientific method (the idea that studies must be based on observable empirical evidence) was Charles Darwin. Darwin introduced the theory of evolution to the scientific world of the 1800s, and criminologists around the world were quick to apply his research to mankind. Among the first was Cesare Lombroso (1911), founder of the Italian School of Positivist Criminology. Lombroso argued that criminality was inherited and therefore someone was “born criminal”. Lombroso went on to say that …show more content…

This belief that negative traits could be inherited was taken by Francis Galton in the mid-1800s and applied to positive traits. Galton studied whether human ability was hereditary by tracing the familial success of prominent men around his time. He published his findings in his book Hereditary Genius (1869) in which he found that ability was inherited. He continued this line of thought with a survey of English scientists in 1883 in which he attempted to determine whether their interest in their profession was a product of their environment or their heredity. Later that same year, Galton developed the concept of eugenics. Eugenics was the belief that the human race could be improved by encouraging couples that possessed characteristics which society deemed positive to have children, and discouraging other …show more content…

In these studies, the behaviour of adopted children is compared to that of their adopted parents as well as their biological parents. Research shows that there may be a predisposition to criminal behaviour (Mednick, Gabrielli and Hutchins, 1984), but is not conclusive. A meta-analysis of adoption studies conducted by Walters and White (1938) was heavily criticised for its methodology and lack of control, which highlighted the methodological issues with this approach of examining behaviour.

Modern positivism is heavily criticised as treating criminal behaviour as a “disease” and therefore searches for a non-existent cure (Henry and Lanier, 2001). Excessive sentences can be justified using positivist ideology under the guise of rehabilitation. Nevertheless, research into biological criminology has created a large pool of data from which we can conclude that criminal behaviour is a result of a variety of factors, but importantly, at least some of those factors are found within the

Open Document