Character Analysis of Brutus and Marc Antony

1310 Words3 Pages

Character Analysis of Brutus and Marc Antony
Brutus and Cassius work together with other conspirators to kill Caesar. Caesar had good ideas, which would work, but Brutus goes against him, thinking his tactics are good enough. Brutus is killing Caesar for the good of Rome. He knows that Caesar will overpower Rome and be too ambitious.
Analysis of characters:
Brutus is an orator. Antony makes this clear by telling the crowd that he is "no orator as Brutus is." He can manipulate the crowds because, after his speech, the crowds cheer him. He does this by using rhetorical questions: "Who is here so rude/ that would not be a Roman?" By using the word "rude," nobody is going to object or say anything.
Secondly, I will note some of Brutus' negative points. The first point is that he is easily manipulated. We know this because Cassius makes him join the conspirators. This is quite strange, as Brutus was a good orator himself. He is described as a traitor by Mark Antony: "more strong than traitor's arms." Brutus and Cassius are described as "madmen" by a servant: "like madmen through the gates of Rome." These words weren't true because the conspirators were well-organized, and almost nobody knew about what they were about to do to Caesar. However strong he is, he is still quite vulnerable. This is proved when he sees Julius Caesar's ghost. I think that Brutus made the largest mistake: trusting Antony and allowing him to make a speech at Caesar's funeral when Brutus (or no other conspirator) was present.
Analysis of speeches:
In Antony's speeches, Antony did not try to act as a ruler talking to the people (as Brutus seemed to do), but he seemed to talk to the people as though he was one of them. The Plebeians knew that Antony was not a high ruler, and Antony made himself out to be one of the local senators who listened to the people and truly respected them. Antony uses repetition to get his message across to the Plebeians.

Open Document