Cause And Effect Essay On The Crusades

684 Words2 Pages

Many people can agree that looking back on the Crusades today, it was a Crime against humanity. The Crusades were a series of eight Christian military expeditions fought against Muslims for the Holy Lands between the years of 1096 and 1270 C.E. A new group of Muslims called Seljuk Turks took control of the Holy Lands, including Jerusalem, and did not allow christians any access to it. People’s motivation for fighting in the crusades included religious convictions, the church agreed to pay their taxes, and they had the opportunity to gain personal wealth by claiming riches in the Holy Land. However, although these sound like valid reasons to fight in the Crusades, the short term gains are outweighed by the negative outcomes and effects that came from this war. “The Crusades - the most signal and most durable monument of human folly that has yet appeared in any age or nation.” ― David Hume. Hume’s quote explains that the crusades were one of the worst decision’s that a society has made in history. They were unsuccessful because of these three reasons, impact it had on catholic church, Constantinople destroyed, and bloodshed of many. …show more content…

People even sold their estates to the church at low costs and this allowed the Church to gain more land. The Catholic Church was a major part of the crusaders everyday lives. People wanted to conquer the “holy land” because of their religious purposes. A negative effect that the crusades had on the church was the cost of having people readily available to help soldiers in need. Since the church was so involved with the Crusades people came to them for help. The long term effects out weigh the short term gain. The Papacy’s relationship with the kings and nobles was damaged which caused the churches physical power to

More about Cause And Effect Essay On The Crusades

Open Document