Social Division And Visible Disability Essay

1487 Words3 Pages

Social Division and Visible Disability Railway, bus and minibus are the most used transportations in Hong Kong, with millions of commuters everyday. Despite the different measures implemented by government and private enterprises to enhance accessibility of facilities, a minority group of disabled people still not able to utilize the public transportation system as unrestrictedly as other able-bodied citizens. Personally, I have experienced situations and witnessed cases that people with disability having significant difficulty in entering the transports or on board. For instance, I accompanied my grandfather, who was a wheelchair user and suffered from stroke, to see the doctor by train. There was stair-lift at our designated exit. Asides …show more content…

According to The Disability Discrimination Ordinance, visible disability is defined as one's loss or malfunction of bodily capacities, including diseases, disorders, and injuries. These inherent attachments may affect one’s capability of participating in social and individual activities. Therefore, a specific division is formed - people of able-bodied and the disabled. For instance, a wheelchair user (my grandfather) versus the staff; the sightless lady versus my own self. Due to present medical technological limitation, this classification tends to be enduring and substantial, some sectors may even be permanently …show more content…

Consequently, a vicious cycle could be formed. In order to resolve this oppression situation, changing mentality and eliminating misunderstanding of both parties are essential. For able-body, one should learn thoroughly about obstacles the underprivileged encountered by daily observation or even real-time participation in experiential programs provided by respective organization, such as Dialogue in the Dark for sightless experience. In contrast, the disabled people proactively acquiring life skills can improve one’s self esteem, lower one’s dependence, and reduce people’s presumption disadvantaging

Open Document