Hershey Executive Summary

801 Words2 Pages

Hershey’s, is the one of the oldest and largest chocolate manufacturers in Pennsylvania, North America. It was founded by Milton S. Hershey in 1894 and its products are sold in about sixty countries and employ approximately 13 000 employees worldwide. Hershey priced its products low so in order to achieve a high sales volume huge quantities needed to be sold. Highly efficient information technology was required. In the early 1990’s the legacy systems was used for various functions. In 1996 Hershey gave its approval to a project named Enterprise 21.
The main reason for Enterprise 21 was:
• To enhance their competitiveness
• To co-ordinate deliveries
• Help retailers to reduce inventory costs
• Provide a better customer experience
• Re-organise …show more content…

Manugistics provided software for transport and production.
• The software from Siebel assisted the company manage customer relations and track marketing
• IBM Global Services was chosen to integrate and put all systems on a single platform.
• The initial plan was to shift to the new system by April 1999, when the annual sales were usually lower. This meant that the project which would normally take four years had to be finished in just over thirty months.
• By January 1999, some of the modules from SAP had been implemented. However, other modules from SAP, Manugistics and Siebel were behind schedule.
• Hershey planned to switch over to the new systems during April 1999, which was a “quieter” season for confectionery sales but modules were added three months behind schedule.
• Hershey was not able to postpone the implementation, as the Y2K problem was looming, and orders for Halloween started pouring in.
• Hershey then decided on a Big Bang. All the software was implemented at one go, instead of a phased approach of one module at a …show more content…

Three weeks after the Big Bang approach was implemented, it was obvious that Hershey would not be able to meet its deadlines and the company was 15 days behind schedule in orders. Hershey’s implementation team made the mistake of using shortcuts in systems testing, data migration and training without the appropriate testing. As a result critical data process and systems integration issues went unnoticed until it was too late. I don’t think that the company should have rolled out all three systems at the same time. Testing should never be sacrificed even if it sets back the launch date. If the testing was done using real operating conditions, critical issues would have been discovered before the launch. So when the business went live, there were many unforeseen issues preventing orders from flowing through the system, resulting in drop in profits and decline in stock price. The phased approached would allow them to find and correct bugs before moving onto the next phase. Another huge mistake made was to squeeze a complex ERP implementation project into an unreasonably short deadline. The timing cutover was also scheduled over the company’s busy season. It was unreasonable for Hershey’s to expect that it would be able to meet peak demand when employees were not yet fully trained on the new systems and business processes. So in other words, Hershey’s lacked experience

More about Hershey Executive Summary

Open Document