Case Study Kevin's Case

411 Words1 Page

The issues involved in Kevin’s case starts with his family values. Kevin seems to thrive on the attention he’s getting from his peers during school. The problem is its negative attention because it’s encouraging him to engage in negative behaviors during class. Kevin is narcissistic he feels as if he’s above the rules at school and in a way, he is because his parents have been preventing him from receiving consequences for his behaviors. Kevin’s parents are enabling these negative behaviors by defending him.
I noticed in Piaget stages of moral development Kevin is in the autonomous morality stage. Kevin has realized the rules at school and standards can be negotiated and or changed because his parents can get the school to change the rules or policies for his benefit. On Kohlberg’s stage Kevin, his behaviors can be related to the conventional level stage 4. Broderick and Blewitt describes Kohlberg’s conventional morality as “what is right depends on other’s approval or on the need to maintain social order” (pg. 261). Kevin’s peers react to his negative behaviors is effecting his moral …show more content…

Kevin has become accustom to his parents bailing him out when he engages in negative behaviors. I would work on the Miller’s cognitions in regards to holding Kevin accountable for his actions. Maybe they believe if they do hold Kevin accountable it would prevent him from “lively and creative” or prevent him from being able to expresses himself out of fear of being punishment. Working with them educating them on strategies and techniques to deter negative behaviors at school. Also, working with them planning and predicting for Kevin push back because he’s not use to be held accountable for his behaviors so there will be push back. I believe changing Kevin parents parenting techniques will help in the process to promote healthy

Open Document