INTRODUCTION: This is an ADD report to Officer Crawford’s #1600, H&S 11359- Possession of Marijuana for Sales report. INVESTIGATION: On 04-09-16 at approximately 1518 hours, Officer Crawford and I responded to 1299 N. Fair Oaks Avenue regarding three subjects who were seen smoking marijuana in a vehicle investigation. Upon our arrival, we located a grey Lexus ES300 California license plate #4CLS255 at the above location. We found four male Blacks inside of the vehicle and confirmed they were smoking marijuana. The four males were handcuffed and detained pending further investigation. The handcuffs were double locked. I retrieved the above listed items as evidence (Items 1-9). I took photos of the above listed items (see attached photos). I then retrieve the items as evidence. …show more content…
Suspect Thomas was arrested for H&S 11350-Possession of a Controlled substance. Sergeant Burgess #2003 approved the arrest. Officer Crawford and I transported the suspects to the Pasadena Jail for booking. Upon our arrival, I read Suspect Thomas his Miranda Rights per Miranda from an approved department issued card. Thomas understood his rights by saying, “Yes.” Thomas waived his rights and agreed to give a statement. Thomas stated the following information in summary: Thomas stated that his green Honda Accord California license plate #4GCN238 has been parked at the above location for approximately six months in parking spot #16. Thomas has not driven the vehicle since December of 2015. Approximately three days ago, Thomas paid the DMV $180.00 to update the vehicle’s registration. Thomas then began driving the vehicle. Thomas found an empty bottle of Promethazine Codeine syrup inside of his vehicle. Thomas stated the codeine belonged to his girlfriend, Ladaiaja Fuller (626-394-5000). Fuller reportedly took the codeine for an unknown stomach condition,
The police responded to a tip that a home was being used to sell drugs. When they arrived at the home, Gant answered the door and stated that he expected the owner to return home later. The officers left and did a record check of Gant and found that his driver’s license had been suspended and there was a warrant for his arrest. The officers returned to the house later that evening and Gant wasn’t there. Gant returned shortly and was recognized by officers. He parked at the end of the driveway and exited his vehicle and was placed under arrest 10 feet from his car and was placed in the back of the squad car immediately. After Gant was secured, two officers searched his car and found a gun and a bag of cocaine.
On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at approximately 1956 hours, Officer Reinbold #7400 and I (Officer Guerrero #3310) were dispatched to 1113 Marengo Avenue, in regard to a vandalism that just occurred. Dispatch advised the victim (later identified as Kristyn Cota) saw two male juveniles spray painting her fence. Cota advised dispatch she was following both subjects and they were last seen running southbound on Marengo Avenue, from Hammond Street. The first suspect was described as male Hispanic, approximately 15 years old, wearing a gray shirt and dark colored shorts. The second suspect
On June 26, 2006, a Sheriff Officer of the State of Florida, William Wheetley and his drug detection dog, Aldo, were on patrol. Furthermore, Officer Wheetley conducted a traffic stop of the defendant Clayton Harris for expired tags on his truck. As Officer Wheetley approached the truck, he noticed that Harris was acting nervous/anxious, more than he should have, and he also noticed an open can of beer in the cup holder next to him. At that moment, Officer Wheetley knew that he was hiding something, he requested to search
Miranda rights are the entitlements every suspect has. An officer of the law is required to make these rights apparent to the suspect. These are the rights that you hear on every criminal investigation and policing show in the country, “You have the right to remain silent, anything you say may be used against you, you have the right to consult an attorney, if you can no t afford an attorney one will be appointed for you.” After the suspect agrees that he or she understands his/her rights, the arrest and subsequent questioning and investigation may continue. These are liberties that were afforded to suspected criminals in the Miranda Vs Arizona. However, with every rule there also exceptions like: Maryland v. Shatzer, Florida v. Powell, and Berghuis v. Thompkins.
Petitioner David Leon Riley was originally stopped for a traffic violation. The registration tags on the car that Riley was driving were currently expired. During the traffic stop the police officer also learned that Riley’s driver license was suspended. Police policy required the police officer to impound the vehicle because Riley’s license was suspended. Continuing to follow police policy a second police officer performed an inventory search of Riley’s car. The search led to Riley’s arrest for possession of two loaded handguns that were found under the hood of the car. The officer also proceeded to seize Riley’s cell phone which was located in his pocket. About two hours after the arrest a gang unit detective analyzed the content on Riley’s cell phone. As a result, Riley was tied to a shooting that had occurred several weeks early. In relation to the shooting Riley was charged with firing at an occupied vehicle, attempted murder, and assault with
...e police officers. Miranda established the precedent that a citizen has a right to be informed of his or her rights before the police attempt to violate them with the intent that the warnings erase the inherent coercion of the situation. The Court's violation of this precedent is especially puzzling due to this case's many similarities to Miranda.
After an arrest is made, before they may begin questioning, they must first advise the suspect of their rights, and make sure that the suspect understands them. These rights are known as the Miranda Warnings and include: 1. What is the difference between a. and a. You have the right to remain silent and refuse to answer questions. 2.
Miranda rights, also known as the Miranda warning, is a warning given by police in the United States to suspects in custody before they are interrogated. The name Miranda rights comes from the case Miranda v. Arizona, where the Supreme Court held that the admission of incriminating statements by a suspect who has not been read their rights, violates one's right to counsel. Therefore, if a police officer does not inform a suspect of their Miranda rights, they may not interrogate that person and cannot use that person's statements to incriminate him or her in a court of law (Miranda Warning, 2014).... ... middle of paper ... ...
At approximately 3:01 p.m., I Detective L. Donegain made contact with John Miles in Jail Pod BB 232l. I read the Search Warrant to Miles. I then collected his DNA at approximately 3:05 p.m., after collecting his DNA he was given a copy of the Search Warrant and turned back over to the Jail.
On 05/27/2016, at approx. 2240 hours, your affiant and Officer Buchinsky observed Albert Joseph BESPARIS walking southbound on the unit block of North Ferguson Street. BESPARIS was holding and actively drinking a 24 oz. Genesee beer beverage. We made contact with him and he stated he knows he shouldn't have it open but was "real thirsty."
The Miranda warnings stem from a United States Court’s decision in the case, Miranda v. Arizona. There are two basic conditions that must be met for Miranda warnings to be required: the suspect must be in official police custody and the suspect must be under interrogation. The suspect goes through a booking process after an arrest. The suspect will have a bond hearing shortly after the completion of the booking process or after arraignment. The arraignment is the suspect’s first court appearance to officially hear the charges filed against him or her and to enter a plea. The preliminary hearing or grand jury proceeding determines if there is substantial evidence for the suspect to be tried for the crime charged. In this essay, I will identify and describe at least four rights afforded criminal defendants at the arrest stage and during pretrial. I will analyze the facts presented and other relevant factors in the scenario provided. I will cite legal authority to support my conclusions.
What does this mean to you? Well if you are ever arrested for being suspected of a crime, the police are legally obligated to advise you of your Miranda rights. If they do not do this and they start to ask you questions, and interrogate you, then anything you say cannot be used against you in court, and you could have the charges dropped. The police are not supposed to question you at all unless you have been read your Miranda rights and you then waive those rights. You can waive your rights either verbally tell the officer you waive your rights, or by signing a rights waiver form.
"Marijuana - Drugs of Abuse and Related Topics - NIDA." Web. 12 Dec. 2011. .
On Saturday, October 22, 2016, at approximately 1338 hours, I Officer M. Alfaro was on patrol at the 800 block of South Jackson Street, in a mark Midland Police Department Patrol vehicle and in standard issue Midland Police Department uniform when I Officer Alfaro observed a black 1996 Chevrolet pick-up making a left turn at the intersection of Jackson and Cloverdale Rd.
Miranda is a ruling which says that the accused have the right to remain silent and prosecutors may not use statements made by them while in police custody, unless the police advice them of their rights. In other words, a police officer must inform a suspect of this fundamental right, under the Fifth Amendment, at the time of their arrest and or interrogation. Miranda protect ignorant suspects from incriminating themselves.