Case Analysis Of Microsoft

1569 Words4 Pages

Since the early 1980’s, Microsoft Corporation has been a global leader in software technology . Founded by Bill Gates and Paul Allen , Microsoft’s history with computing and software is quite lengthy as is accomplished. According to their company website, Gates and Allen began small, but went on with the express goal to famously ensure that there was “a computer on every desktop and in every home. ” In subsequent years, Microsoft positioned its brand as an innovative leader in software, and begins to proceed to change the way we work. From producing operating systems for IBM’s Personal Computer , to purchasing exclusive rights of the QDOS operating system from Seattle Computer, to then further modifying QDOS into the iconic MS-DOS — a product …show more content…

Over the years, Microsoft’s primary competitors have been Google, SAP, IBM, and Oracle among others, but more prominently, Apple Inc., especially for their laptops, operating systems, and so much more . Significantly, Microsoft’s market is an oligopoly , and there is always the fear of substitution among competition. Although their dominance in the productivity software and operating system industries reflects Microsoft’s superiority in product quality for PC’s, the overarching idea remains that if the price of Microsoft goods and services increase, while the prices of its competitors’ products remains unchanged, then there would be a reduction in the quantity demanded for Microsoft products, In addition, if both Microsoft’s Windows OS product and Apple’s Mac OS product are substitutes, then if Microsoft were to charge higher prices, then in consequence, will cause an increase of demand for their competitor’s products, as industry consumers would be willing to purchase the other product to fulfill their needs with a lower price, as determined by the substitution theory …show more content…

By planning to work towards improving the brands they do best, such as Windows and Office, further ensures their two leading markets will keep generating revenue. That is, as long as PC’s remain relevant. However, even though Microsoft’s market shares in the gaming console, mobile, and tablet sectors aren’t as high as in their desktop OS and productivity market, Microsoft’s ambitions to build intelligent cloud platforms and more personal computing then further augments their weaknesses in these markets. In that building a more intelligent cloud platform pushes for innovation, and furthermore, the cloud platform connects all of Microsoft’s various product lines into one cohesive system. In addition, the focus to make more personal computing addresses the threat of low PC sales projected by Gertner Inc. With market trends that push for more 2-in-1 systems, i.e. more efficiency and power for smartphones-- Microsoft’s Surface tablet line, will always manage to improve the computing power of its predecessor while preserving portability per its periodic release. In addition, in further improvement of those markets, Microsoft can also address their competition through more innovation for their technology throughout diversity in their Windows brand. What is most important is, overall, the corporate push to “empower every person and

Open Document