Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee Summary

441 Words1 Page

In Dee Brown's Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, he argues that the Native American Indians were victimized and that the Americans, or pale-skins, were a greedy and dishonorable race. Brown claims that after the Civil War, the American government decided to explore their western territory that they had gained from the Mexican-American War. Even though most of the land belonged to Native American Indian tribes, the government went against their own treaties with the Indians and began to relocate them, so their settlers could take their place. Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee gives several accounts of different tribes and their struggles against the United States government. Some Native Americans peacefully gave up their land and relocated, but many …show more content…

Brown states that in 1625, some settlers asked the chief of the Pemaquid tribe, Samoset, for some land. To "humor" them, Samoset performed a ritual to be able to "transfer" the land of his people over to the white man, making this the first land contract. Nevertheless, as more settlers came, they disregarded the contract made and just took the land for their own, causing the Pemaquids to be pushed back into wilderness. This also happened to other tribes, resulting in a war between several Native American tribes and the English. The English men, turned Americans in later years, continued to expand their colonies pushing the Natives westward. Brown is clearly stating that the white men are greedy and will continue to use the Indians first gift of generosity as justification to take more land without permission. Although neither side is completely innocent, it was the Americans that really caused the trouble. Sometimes even when the tribes moved peacefully the government would kill an innocent, make it nearly impossible for them to eat, leading to starvation, or try to place a blame on them for one reason or another. For example, the US

Open Document