Bubonic Plague: Christian And Muslim Response

651 Words2 Pages

Christian and Muslim responses were vastly different on the bubonic plague based on what people thought caused it, prevention methods, and viewpoints. And with common knowledge of the religions’s relationship with each other today, it is easy to see how the responses would be different. The biggest difference has to do with perspective from citizens. These religions saw different things and got different feelings towards all the fatalities and infection that surrounded them.Christians got hit very hard by the effects of the plague emotionally and physically while Muslims seemed to handle the plague fairly well emotionally, however, the mortality rate in either place was still high and around the same percentage. Not saying that Muslims did not suffer from the plague, just about anybody that watches people they love die in any way, mourn and feel pain from it. …show more content…

Both religions were terrified of the disease, but the Muslims were more accepting of it. Muslims did not blame anybody for the plague, they just accepted it as a type of holy penance and moved on. Christians, on the other hand, blamed the Jews. Many Jews in Europe were forced to convert to Christianity because of the deadly discrimination they were receiving, therefore, leading them to “convert or die”. Even some Jews that converted also died by the hands of Christians. One might think that this discrimination against the Jews during this time was like a miniature holocaust. In Document seven of the D.B.Q., the poem “Burning of the Jews” written in 1348 by Johannes Nohl is a perfect example of what happened to a lot of Jews when they crossed paths with angry

Open Document