Brutus Caesar Research Paper

432 Words1 Page

Topic: Post-Caesar, which character would be a better leader for Rome: Cassius or Brutus? Analyze each character's strengths and weaknesses and support with ample evidence from the text.

Introduction paragraph: The people of Rome need a new, responsible leader that can replace Caesar; that leader should be Brutus so the citizens can live in a safe city that has a stable government, and an honorable leader.

Concrete Detail: Brutus demonstrates his leadership abilities when he decides to live by honor and not live by emotion; when the conspirators come to Brutus to convince him to kill Caesar, he agrees to “kill him boldly, but not wrathfully/ let’s carve him as a dish fit for the gods/ not hew him as a carcass fit for hounds” (Shakespeare II .i. 172-174). Commentary: Other men would have killed Caesar in gruesome ways, but …show more content…

33-34) and decides to kill Caesar before he can flourish.

Commentary: Brutus is Caesar’s loyal friend, so instead of killing him out of jealousy and pride, Brutus agrees to kill Caesar so the Roman citizens can live in a good, safe city.

Commentary: All though Brutus still feels shame and guilt in his decision to murder his close friend, he knows that killing Caesar before he is crowned king will be best for the present and future citizens of Rome.

Concrete detail: Brutus lives by honor in every aspect of his life, including his marriage; Portia, his wife, treats Brutus with respect and love, so Brutus honors his wife by respecting her, and trying to be “worthy of this noble wife!” (Shakespeare II.i.304).

Commentary: In this period of time, women aren’t treated equal to men; Brutus defies this and treats his wife with love, respect, honor, and

Open Document