Brock Turner Case Analysis

529 Words2 Pages

Those who play with fire will eventually be burn. Tracey Kaplan, a journalist from San Jose Mercury News, recall the latest hearing of Brock Turner case. The man behind this young boy lenient sentence is judge Aaron Persky, for his decision caused chaos in the media platform. According to Kaplan, critics are creating petitions with thousands of signatures vowing to remove Persky from his seat. After learning his seat is endangered with threats. “Persky will return to hearing civil cases at the Old Courthouse near St. James Park in downtown San Jose.” Meanwhile, Judge Vincent J. Chiarello will replace Persky in criminal matter in Palo Alto on September 6. In fact, the replacement is not a permanent change, which had made many critics argue this change will not teach him the bias decision he made. Moreover, Turner’s case have made the national focuses on the campus sexual assaults. Surprisingly, “California law treats sexual assault of a conscious person as a more severe crime than …show more content…

After numerous of petitions for Persky removal from the courthouse, Persky volunteered to move in the downtown San Jose in order to avoid the criminal cases. He can use such petty excuse to claim with the public he has stepped down from his high established position, yet he does not realize he requested to move in the most ideal city in the nation, San Jose. Despite Persky brightly new road that will last him until the next election, his supporter claimed “ that Persky doesn’t deserve to be the target of ‘this hysteria’ because he is extremely prudent and fair.” However, Persky has yet proven himself “prudent and fair” with Brock’s case. Persky can argue there are not many laws that are in favor of unconscious rape crimes, but a three months sentence for Brock will never justify the assault remorse to the twenty minutes of action. Judge Persky should not even be called a judge, yet he should be a businessman since all he knows is

Open Document