Boston Marathon Bombing Analysis

622 Words2 Pages

Edward Snowden uses the 2013 Boston Marathon Bombings as his central example in regards to government oversight and mass surveillance failure. Prior to the bombings, Russian authorities had been tracking and monitoring the Tamerlan and Dzhokar Tsarnaev and informed US officials about the brothers (Zetter). Even though the US had been tipped off by Russia two years before the bombings took place, the FBI only performed a cursory investigation, even though they knew the Tsarnaevs were involved with extremism; no follow up investigation was ever made (Deluca). After the attack had occurred, even with surveillance footage of the suspected brothers, facial-recognition software, and two government databases, authorities could not identify the Tsarnaevs. The watch lists, which should have notified authorities if suspects traveled abroad, likewise failed: the databases had misspelled the suspects’ names by a letter and had the wrong birthdates. Surveillance technology was unsuccessful: the NSA collected data on the Tsarnaevs before the bombing, but had not realized that it was more important than the data they collected on millions of others (Zetter). …show more content…

He advocates for a targeted, thorough approach that concentrates on known radicals and extremists rather than attempting to scrutinize the data of thousands of others. The Boston marathon bombings model shows how bulk surveillance depletes its resources to observe the masses at the expense of being able to monitor and track specific people for which there are explicit causes for investigating, such the Tsarnaev

Open Document