Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sexuality in adolescence
Sexuality in adolescence
Sexuality in adolescence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sexuality in adolescence
Books should be banned. The printing press was a writing invention that first appeared in 1440 in the Holy Roman Empire. Book banning prevents children and young adults from inappropriate and value deteriorating material.
Book banning averts children from reading obscene topics such as murder and racism. Graphic descriptions of murder can leave a negative effects on young minds. For example, the novel “Huckleberry Finn” contains mentions of murder. Since this book could be found in public school, it is a prime instance of children being subjected to murder. This could leave young adults to the impression that murder is not a bad as it seems, as it was easily accessible to them.
Some books, used as educational basis, contain X-rated racist
…show more content…
Children who read a book with vulgar language may think that those words are okay to use because they’ve read them in a public area. According to an interview with Mrs. Friedman, many parents fall into the idea that “if he has to be 18 to buy the tape, he has to be 18 to take it out of the library” (Roleff). Various parents would feel more comfortable with an age limit to books. This restricts children under the said age to be subjected to material that deteriorates their innocence. Salacious and rude behaviors within a book can causes influences that ruin family traditions and values. Many parents believe that some books are “pure rot” because of the family-value damaging content that lies within the covers (Lankford). Children are often naively drove to the library, parents unknowing of the content easily found within the shelves. Books like these goes against family preferences, religions, limits, and traditions which is why many are challenged of their …show more content…
Young adults should have access to books that contain homosexuality and other diverse preferences in order to understand others around them and know what to do when subjected to real life matters. After the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) asked Texas to open their records on banned books relating to gay and lesbian content from August 1995 to July 1997, they found that nearly 220 titles by 142 authors were questioned of their appropriateness (Barbour). Teaching children from a young age that people are different can alter their views and opinions for the rest of their lives. Eliminating books that contain factual circumstances does not give them the opportunity to be subjected to different lifestyles. Banning books containing homosexuality is homophobic, or the hatred and fear of gays and lesbians. In 1997, a school in Jefferson County, Kentucky, numerous parents’ requests of removing books published by a gay author were rejected by the school district committee (Barbour). Limiting an authors’ ability to put their books in library and schools is an example of censorship. Parents sometimes feel that the presence of gay and lesbian material is a bad influence on their
Banning books from public schools and public libraries is wrong. It’s irrational to have a parent or school board member’s opinion determine what a school district should be reading. Books including and not limited to, The Scarlet Letter, The Great Gatsby, To Kill a Mockingbird, The Lord of the Flies, and Animal Farm all have one thing in common. They have all at one time or another been subject to banishment. These literary classics have been around for a long time and proved to be vital to the education of many, especially children and adolescents. These novels teach values and educate children about world affairs that can not come from an everyday experience. These controversial novels encompass the materials that ultimately boost our educational wealth. Banning books infringe
Although students should read novels that they are mature enough to understand and comprehend, Lohmiller explains that by allowing all middle school students access to read novels with profanity and Christian derogatory, it is not certain that all students are mature enough to not have their daily language influenced by it. While children should read material that they are mature enough to comprehend, censoring material in schools because of language and Christian derogatory does not take away student exposure to any of the censored issues, but instead takes away student exposure to a learning environment that would teach meaning and context. The use of "hell" and "damn" and other Christian derogatory in novels is necessary in furthering the storyline and depicting a realistic illustration of the environment. It is necessary to expose children to the evils in novels because "[a]n uneducated world is a miserable world full of fighting and conflict...A world without books is a dystopian world" (Censoring the Pages of Knowledge 1). This explains that student exposure to profanity and Christian derogatory in schools would allow the youth to be educated on the evils and be the gateway for conversations that the students would benefit from later in life. Banning controversial novels for the evils within will create ignorance in the youth of America today, as they will not be educated on the usage in novels, but of the evils through other means that are not explained and understood by youth. By teaching and allowing students to struggle with profane language and controversial topics in schools, it is ensured that students will be educated on the meaning and reasons behind usage. For example, Fahrenheit 451 is a novel that satirizes and challenges censorship in modern society by depicting the effects of that censorship on a future society where all books are burned. By the use of profanity and Christian derogatory as a means of critiquing the society,
Trelease, Jim. "Book Banning Violates Children and Young Adult Freedoms." Book Banning. Ed. Ronnie D. Lankford. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. At Issue. Rpt. from "Censorship and Children's Books." Trelease-on-Reading.com. 2006.Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 31 Mar. 2014.
...etter than ignorance. Book censorship should not limit the amount of knowledge a child can receive, instead, books should be used to benefit children in their education and future career.
...ading the novel. The teacher should always listen to input from the parents of their students, and should make the parents feel comfortable discussing with them the problems they see with their child reading a certain book. There should always be parental consent when reading a book so that the parent will be able to discuss with their child their views and issues on a certain book. Discussion should always be welcome within the classroom for student growth and to confront any issues that may arise. When following these guidelines, teachers can prepare their students for the future real-world problems that they will be confronted with.
People ban or challenge books because they don't want other to read them because of their content, even thought we see most of it in our everyday life. To stop book banning and to keep books on the shelves; if a book has inappropriate content and someone wants to buy it or get it from the library or store they have to get the parents consent. This will also keep parents informed on what their child is reading.
... Donelson, K. (1997). The 'Secondary'. "Filth" and "Pure Filth" in our schools--Censorship of classroom books in the last ten years. English Journal, 86 (2), 21-23.
Banning Books “It’s not just the books under fire now that worry me. It is the books that will never be written, the books that will never be read. And all due to the fear of censorship. As always, young readers will be the real losers” (Blume 1999). Judy Blume can not explain the problem of book censorship any clearer.
From the years 2000 to 2009, 5,099 books were challenged in school libraries, classrooms, and public libraries. Most of the books on this list were banned because of objectionable content such as sexual references, profanity, violence, and the fact that the book was considered “unsuited to age group” (American Library Association). Even prior to the year 2000, censorship and banned books had become an issue for schools in particular all across the country for these very reasons. While the The Color Purple by Alice Walker does contain the objectionable content mentioned prior, it should not be banned because objectionable content found in the book is accessible through the internet and social media, one person’s complaint should not determine another’s choice, and high school students should be mature enough to handle the adult content.
Retrieved December 2, 2002 from Lexis-Nexis/Academic database. This article addresses some of the reasons that censors attempt to remove books from the curriculum: Many censors feel that works are not age appropriate for students. Staff, Wire Reports. (2002 October 3). Book banning spans the globe.
Such as this quote, "You aren't really a nigger-lover, then, are you?" This highlights the derogatory terms used at that time and the lesson teaching how the use of this hateful slur helps us understand more about the people who uses this than the person receiving them. This is a great life lesson taught through this “controversial” book. The act of banning this book defeats the whole purpose, leaving us vulnerable to repeat the same mistake as our ancestors. We are not justifying the right and the wrongs of our past history, it is just that we don’t want to repeat the same mistakes.
Censorship in School Libraries The most debatable and controversial form of censorship today is the banning of books in school libraries. Banning books that educate students is wrong and selfish. Censorship of books in school libraries is neither uncommon nor an issue of the past. Books with artistic and cultural worth are still challenged constantly by those who want to control what others read. The roots of bigotry and illiteracy that fuel efforts to censor books and free expression are unacceptable and unconditional.
The lessons taught to children by the puritanical books, though, were far from the rudimentary ideas that I had of teaching children morality through gentle children’s books. An insight that I gained from reading West’s article Teaching Banned Children’s Books was that Children’s literature as a genre is much more powerful than what I gave it credit for. In fact, the idea of children’s literature lacking power as a genre because the wording is simple is far from true. Children’s literature elicits many strong emotions and draws critics because of the types of ideas that the genre exposes young minds to. West introduces that censorship is used in children’s literature to prevent children from being exposed to ideas that are too controversial, challenge authority, contained sexuality, described violent acts, and address social problems (West,1).
The banning of books has now become a common policy in the US. Books are becoming banned for numerous reasons that some people might view as dumb or irrelevant. Many authors think that censorship is unfair and “Writers want to talk about creation, and censorship is anti-creation, negative energy, or uncreation…”(Rushdie 2017). When books become banned they are considered a violation to the first amendment by restricting what it is considered the authors freedom of speech. Censorship is also known for intruding art.
Some people may argue, if kids didn’t read about these things, they wouldn’t know about them, but in all reality, that’s absurd. Some kids hear foul language and use it before they can even read. Children see things, hear things and do things, that we consider “bad” in these books, before they have even touched a chapter book. We should not be able