Book Analysis: Helping The Homeless

1615 Words4 Pages

Helping the Homeless: Guilt vs. Reality Homelessness is an increasing problem in many cities today. More and more people litter street corners with cardboard signs begging for spare change. Numerous research and studies have been conducted as to how these unfortunate people have become homeless, but more importantly, ways to permanently help their situations. Both Derek Thompson’s article “Should you give money to homeless people?” and Bobby Magill’s article “Grand Junction comes to terms with homeless” claim that a substantial gift of direction and support instead of loose change will create the greatest, lasting impact in the homeless’ lives. Although both authors successfully use rhetorical strategies to make their arguments, Bobby Magill’s …show more content…

Instead of money, the authors suggest “donating” service to the homeless. Thompson argues that loose change “might encourage, rather than relieve, the anguish of the poor” (Thompson). By providing a long term aid, the homeless are able to better their lives for tomorrow as well. Instead of helping these people relieve their hunger for one day, the authors encourage helping their long term needs, such as assistance in finding a job or stopping an addiction. Long term aid is more beneficial for both the homeless and those giving. The needy are able to get their lives back on track, while the donors are able to help a stranger, and ultimately clean the streets of possibly dangerous beggars. A short term goal for Grand Junction “is to decriminalize it” (Magill), making the community parks safe again. This, in the long run, will allow the public to once again gather at these community parks, making the city of Grand Junction a closer knit and safer place. Both authors have similar goals in writing their articles, yet Magill’s outlines specifics as to how to achieve this goal. Each author is determined to help the homeless and accomplish the same outcome, yet Magill provides more definite steps as how to get …show more content…

In Thompson’s article, he executes numerous studies and polls to question what homeless people truly need the most, with “help finding a job” (Thompson) coming out with the highest percentage. This poll relates the fact that although loose change might help the destitute for a day or two, providing a way to change the life of that person would have a greater benefit. Correspondingly, Magill explains how the city of Grand Junction is tackling the issue of homelessness. Mayor Teresa Coons is at the head of this plan to help the needy, by “conven[ing] a City Council subcommittee on homelessness soon after she took office” (Magill). This subcommittee focuses its attention on the public face of homelessness, and solutions on how to decrease those affected by it. Giving examples of factual steps taken to deal with this issue creates effective arguments for both authors. The use of logos within each article is proof to each authors’ claim, and adds to the argument itself. Although Thompson proposes the same claim as in the article “Grand Junction comes to terms with homeless”, Magill reports on a solution put forth to help the crisis of homelessness. The subcommittee is the direction both articles argue is needed, yet in Magill’s article, the direction is being done rather than proposed. This evidence provided from both articles is focused on similar goals, yet

More about Book Analysis: Helping The Homeless

Open Document