Blatstein's Swot Analysis

2196 Words5 Pages

Introduction
In 1916, a Frenchman named Henri Fayol wrote a book entitled Administration Industrielle et General. As a former coal mine director, Fayol had discovered four distinct functions of management he stated were applicable in any industry. Today, these functions are still found in any industry or business in the world.
The four functions of management are Planning, Organizing, Leading and Controlling. Planning sets the direction a company is going, and how it will accomplish those goals. Planning involves day to day operational issues and well as forecasting the future, and creating plans to deal with uncertainty. With most businesses, planning is constantly updated and improved as necessary in order to create better processes, and
According to Yuksel, “SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) analysis is one of the approaches used in the analysis of the strategic position of a company as part of the strategic planning process” (Yuksol, 2012, p. ). Yuksol studied strengths and opportunities as benefits, and addressed weaknesses and threats as costs and concludes “The significance of a factor for a corporation depends on its simultaneous evaluation with all other factors” (Yuksol, 2012, p.). Using the proposed model, management can evaluate strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats and how these factors help or harm an organization. Based on a SWOT analysis, an organization can use the information to create a strategic plan to alleviate weaknesses and threats. Again, the theme of continuous planning as conditions evolve is
The article discusses how leadership training should be conducted, and concludes ethics training is not about introducing additional subjects, it is about focusing on ethics and not just the technical aspect of a leaders duties in order to develop a “leader who pursue what is best for the common good in ways are ethical, responsible, and sustainable” (Smit, 2013, p. ). Transformational vs Transactional Leadership: Which is Better? Discusses transactional and transformational leadership, in order to debate which is better for the hotel industry in Taiwan. Both leadership styles were presented and shown to be influential. Transactional leadership was more beneficial in affecting organizational commitment, while transformational was found to be better in the area of gaining employees trust. The study revealed both styles are best used together, “Transformational and transactional should be used simultaneously to get the best effect of leadership styles” (Hui-Chun et. al., 2013, p. ). The study made sure to point out Transformational style was found to be the best in this instance. The common themes of leadership are focused training, employee development, and employee empowerment is

Open Document