Black Foot Compared to Inuits
Have you ever tried to compare two different Indian groups?... Neither have I, Until now! Something you should know is that Blackfoot people lived/live in Montana, and the Inuits live in Canada the comparison is way different. I will talk about two differences and one similarity category, Two in each.
This first one is on the Blackfoot side. Housing, blackfoot makes teepees as their housing. The Inuit use Igloos, and other kinds of ice houses. This is the way this is because of their resources. The Inuit have access to snow and ice, but the Inuit have access to wood and a good amount of animals for their hide and fur. Not to switch the subject, wait nevermind. Too switch the subject, Blackfoot has
…show more content…
Not to get pg. at all, just going to tell you about some they used. To start with they both made and used Ulus. Ulus are curved knives. Later on, they used regular knives and spears. My next combined one goes with weapons. They were both introduced to Europeans. By this happening The Blackfoot and the Inuit were also introduced to weapons and how to use them. This was a plus because they could hunt and fight easier. If you couldn’t tell this was a similarity because this event happened to both groups.
Lastly, The Inuit have different clothing because of the environment they live in. The Blackfoot had/have very thin, skin clothing because they live in regular, all season weather. The Inuit were very heavy wool clothing because they live in the cold weather. Next, they both ate differently because of where they lived. Blackfoot people usually ate bison, ground squirrels, nuts and berries. The Inuit usually ate Hooded seal, Caribou, Narwhal, Arctic fox and the Arctic hare. You can obviously see that they ate very different foods, So this is a difference.
I’m going to compare Inuit people and the Blackfoot people, Completed. So after talking about the four differences and the two similarities I hope you learned something about my certain topic. Remember, It doesn’t have to be the same to be cool, In the end It doesn’t
Inuit Odyssey, by CBC’s: The Nature of Things covers the long and eventful journey of the Inuit people. Canadian anthropologist, Dr. Niobe Thompson searched for the answers to questions about who the modern day Inuit are, where did they come from, how did they survive and who did they conquer along the way? Thompson explored the direct lineage between modern day Inuit and the Thule people, and their interactions with the Dorset and Norse Vikings in their search for iron. Thompson is ultimately concerned with how the current warming climate will affect the Inuit people therefore, he decides to retrace the creation of the Inuit culture, starting his journey in the original homeland of the Thule people.
A lot of people have tribes, and almost every tribe is different. In rules, looks, and meanings. There are two specific tribes to learn about today. That is the Apache tribe and the Lakota tribe. There are many similarities and differences.
Popular perception of both the Sioux and Zulu peoples often imagines them as timeless and unchanging (at least before their ultimate demise at the hands of whites). To what extent does Gump's book challenge the similarities and differences between the Sioux and Zulu people?
For example , in the encyclopedia of Native Americans it states the Chinook tribe wore prized dentalium shells , the men wore mat robes and wide-brimmed hats made of bear grass or cedar bark. Woman wore knee length fringes dresses made of silk grass or cedar bark. On the other hand , in the Nez Perce tribe section in the encyclopedia of Native Americans it states that in the early times shredded cedar bark , deerskin and rabbit skin were used to make clothing. Men usually wore capes and breech clothing adding fur robes and leggings when it's cold. Women wore large basket hats. Later they started imitating their tailored skin gourmets decorated with shells , elk teeth and beads. This shows that they both wore clothing very
During the fifteenth century, the Europeans set out to find new land, natural resources and spices. The Europeans had contact with one particular group of aboriginals known as the Beothuk, who resided in Newfoundland. The relationship between this tribe and the European settlers was like no other. The conflict between these two groups was quite evident and caused trouble between the Beothuk and Micmac as well. The Beothuk tribe no longer exists.
The environment also affected the Indians shelter in many ways. Depending on where they lived, the Indian tribes had different ways of protecting themselves from the elements using the available resources, and different designs for the general climate. For example, the Indians living in the mountainous and semi-desert areas of the south west lived in light twig shacks and log huts, whereas the Inuits of the sub arctic north America built igloos, and the woodland Indians lived in bark covered houses.
Though both were similar in some ways, they had many, many differences. Even their similarities contained differences! For example, while both the Ojibwe and the Dakota depended on canoes, the Dakota used hollowed-out logs to make canoes and the Ojibwe used a sturdy wooden frame wrapped in Birch or Cedar Bark to make theirs.
There was a period of time, before the appearance of Europeans on the continent, that the Nephilim did not have this “rule” or “compulsion” to keep their existence hidden from humans. The Bigfoot were known to the Native Americans by many names. Legends and lore sprang up from the Native American’s interaction with the Bigfoot. The Native Americans always considered them to be a “society” or “tribe.” The relationship the Bigfoot tribes had with the Native Americans was precarious at best. Many Native American tribes described the Bigfoot as cannibals, mountain devils, kidnappers, rapist, and thieves.
The Inuits food plans are fish and hunted arctic animals. The main reason the Inuit are still in northern Canada, is because they are used to their lifestyle and the northern
Like many Americans I initially grouped all Native Americans into one melting pot. During the Haskell Indian Nations cultural day, on June 21,st 2010, the speakers talked about how different tribes are not the same; they have different beliefs...
Bastien, B. (2011). Blackfoot ways of knowing: The worldview of the siksikaitsitapi. Calgary, Alberta: University of Calgary Press.
Quapaw, Osage, and Caddo have many similarities as well as differences. For example: their religion, food acquisition, food production, and social structure. In this essay, there will be comparisons between the tribes as well as distinctive differences in each tribe. In this paper, information about these tribes will be further explored.
...ught could be seen as arrogant, and had a condescending attitude as they thought the Inuit were “skraelings (a sick, weak person)” (McAnany and Yoffee, p. 56), all their encounters may not have been confrontational. They believe that their attitude simply could have come from a religious factor that it was the difference in being Christian compared to non-Christian. Though artifacts were scarcely found from the Norse in the Thule Inuit ruins and vice versa, the artifacts that were found could represent an encounter, but could as well have been from plundering abandoned homes. Also, when searching Norse settlements, no weapons were found, thus making them powerless against the Inuits if it had come down to a conflict between them. A scene on a small piece of bone did depict a battle, however it is important to note that it did not depict a Norseman against an Inuit.
The sauk-fox tribe was originally two separate tribes, called the Sauk and meskwaki. The two tribes were related to each other, but they also spoke the same language. Than a war with the french almost took the Fox tribe out, so the tribe went to the Sauk tribe, for protection. To this day both tribes live together. As the Sauk and Fox tribe. (thesis statement???)
1. Inuits have a strong bond, in order for the Inuits to survive they need to work together to hunt or build and if they are working with their community to hunt or build they will have a strong bond.At 39:04 in the video it shows the Inuits working together to hunt so they could eat.This shows that the Inuits work together to survive and they have a strong bond because of that.In conclusion, Inuits have a strong bond because they work together in order to survive like hunting they work together to get food for each other so they don’t starve.