Bioviolence And Structural Violence

2268 Words5 Pages

The society we live in today experiences severe global inequality and a huge disparity between the rights accorded to all human beings. An increasing polarization between the rich and the poor and the commercialization of health has resulted in a diverse exploitation of individuals. Social structures inflict harm on the lower vulnerable sections of society in the form of physical, psychological, social, and economic damage. The pivotal cause factor for these avoidable structural inequalities is the unequal distribution of power. This phenomenon of structural violence inhabits our society in various forms. Living in today’s world where individuals are increasingly affected by infectious diseases, infertility, organ loss and nerve damage, it …show more content…

Organ transplantation is one form that fits the definition of structural violence best as it is both exploitative and unethical. Organ commodification is seriously exploitative as organs are removed from the bodies of the poor by inflicting a novel form of bioviolence against them. In his article, Moniruzamman demonstrates how selling kidneys causes serious physical, psychological and social harm to the kidney sellers (Moniruzamman, 2012). Bioviolence is evident as it is not only the act of extracting organs from the physical body, but the whole process involved including deception and manipulation that play a role in exploitation of bodies. The narratives of the kidney sellers revealed how the wealthy buyers tricked the poor into selling their kidneys and how the poor were brutally deceived. The kidney sellers’ health deteriorated, their economic conditions worsened, and their social standing declined in a serious manner after they sold their kidneys. The author shows hat as the transplant industry flourishes, the structural violence against the poor becomes widely institutionalized. Kalindi Vora states that the invention of new transplant technologies and the constraints on South Asian workers creates a system where the lower economic classes live to support other people’s lives in the West (Vora, 2008). Nancy Scheper-Hughes also portrays how the lower sections of the society articulate their own ethical and political categories in the face of the consuming demands which value their bodies most when they can be claimed by the state as repositories of spare parts (Scheper-Hughes, 2000). For the transplant specialists, the organs of the poor is a commodity better used than wasted, while the organ can mean so much more to other people. Therefore we see that this bioviolence, particularly for the

Open Document