Bill T Jones Still Here Analysis

478 Words1 Page

1994, mixed-media, experimental choreographer Bill T. Jones and the Bill T. Jones/Arnie Zane Dance Company premiered Still/Here at the Brooklyn Academy of Music. Still/Here is a two segments evening-length dance piece with a film score made from interviews with people who were or are facing terminal life-threatening illnesses. Ultimately, Jones combines dance theatre and reality. Although this piece would later become a highly acclaimed piece in concert dance. However, not all critics fond over Jones’ work. In fact, dance critic Arlene Croce’s dissertation, Discussing the Undiscussable, she explains why spares herself of a “bad time” and refuses to review the piece. Croce begins Discussing the Undiscussable auguring; “By working dying people into his act, Jones is putting himself beyond the reach of criticism. The dying people are viewed on videotape. He thinks that victimhood in and of itself is sufficient to the creation of an art spectacle. The cultivation of victimhood by institutions devoted to the care of art is a menace to all art forms.” …show more content…

She goes on to describe Still/Here as victim art; forcing her “To feel sorry because the way they present themselves…In short, making victimhood into victim art.” My initial response to Discussing the Undiscussable was confusion. While she passionately argues to defend herself, Croce‘s case is missing one important piece of evidence; the concert. One of the main concepts of Still/Here is maintaining a sense of community, even though death. Croce’s (non)review is based purely on assumption. She believes the interviewees were focused into a position of victimhood, without watching the interviews or witnessing Jone’s intent to reach out and create a community-based production. In a sense, she herself is putting the interviewees in

Open Document