Bhatia V. Chevron Case Study

1047 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Religious discrimination and racial harassment

A Company’s dress codes is very important, and it’s not just about projecting a corporate image. Having a work place dress code is a deterrent from harassment, removes the guess work out of what is or is not appropriate work attire, provides a sense of oneness regardless of the diversity of the workplace, and in some instances can also help prevent workplace injuries.

The law is clear employers cannot discriminate against employees for race, color, creed or religion. And in recent years the EEOC and our court system have made clear that discrimination against employees for their religious beliefs will not be tolerated. But when religious symbols in the work place interfere with job performance or the employees’ health or safety there are …show more content…

Chevron U.S.A., Inc. Pursuant to what it believed were requirements of California 's Occupational Safety and Health Act (Cal/OSHA), Chevron implemented a policy requiring all machinists to shave off any facial hair interfering with the ability to achieve a gas-tight face seal with a respirator. When Bhatia, a machinist and a member of the Sikh religion, refused to shave, he was demoted. It was found that Chevron’s safety concerns were legitimate, the court ruled that accommodating Bhatia’s request to maintain his bearded appearance would subject the company to undue hardship, and consequently it dismissed his claim of religious discrimination (Wolkinson, …show more content…

Oak-Rite Manufacturing Corp., Brenda Enlow applied for a position with Oak-Rite manufacturing and was denied because all employees were required to wear pants and as a member for the Holiness Church, Brenda’s religious beliefs only allowed to wear long skirts. These skirts could pose a hazard around machinery. The EEOC sued on Ms. Enlows behalf arguing that Oak-Rite should accommodate Ms. Enlow by allowing her to wear reasonably close-fitting denim or canvas skirts. Oak-rite argued that doing so would cause an undue hardship of experimenting with employee’s safety when they had a known dress code that was effective. The court agreed, stating that the employer’s limited duty of accommodation under Title VII does not require an employer to choose between potential Title VII liability on the one hand and potentially increased risk of workplace injuries on the other (FLAKE,

Show More
Related

  • Eeoc V. Consolidated Service System Summary

    685 Words  | 2 Pages

    EEOC v. Consolidated Service System, 989 F.2d 233 (Cir. 1993), as cited by Bennett-Alexander, D.D. and Hartman, L. P. (2014) at 195.

    Read More

  • Mary Myers V. New York Transit Authority Case Study

    1264 Words  | 3 Pages

    In accordance with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, any hiring, terminating, and other terms and conditions of employment utilized as means of religious discrimination against an employees is prohibited. Unless, the workers religious request was causing their employer undue hardship. These acts are mandated that employers reasonably accommodate their full time employees’. Reasonable

    Read More

  • The BFOQ: Case Study Of Discrimination In The United States

    782 Words  | 2 Pages

    Nonetheless, after the court trial, it was decided that Southwest Airline’s marketing policy that involved hiring of attractive female applicants only was a violation of Title VII under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In addition to the hiring of attractive female flight attendants, the airline company had also made it a requirement that hired applicants should only be of a maximum height of 5 feet 9 inches. Notwithstanding, the court ruled that, the restriction was a barrier to hiring of men applicants and that it was violation of the same act. As a result, the airline company set aside a $1 million fund for penalties alone after the court ordered the company to pay the plaintiffs $275,000 (Justia,

    Read More

  • Case Study Of Mamma Jo's Pizza '

    1265 Words  | 3 Pages

    b) If Ahmad were terminated for refusing to shave his beard, he could bring the potential claim of religious discrimination against Mamma Jo’s Pizza under Title VII. In order for Ahmad to claim religious discrimination, he needs to show three things in order to establish and prove a prima facie case for disparate treatment. First, he must show that he holds a sincere religious belief that conflicts with a Mamma Jo’s employment requirement. Next, he has to inform Mamma Jo’s about the conflict. Finally, he needs to prove that he was discharged or disciplined for failing to comply with the conflicting no beard employment requirement.

    Read More

  • Case Study Of Abercrombie And Fitch Case

    1462 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Court held that failing to accommodate a potential employee or an employee was enough to bring up a disparate treatment claim. It held that in order to make a claim based on disparate impact the plaintiff needs only to prove that the need for accommodation was the motive behind the employer’s refusal to hire them, not whether the employer knew about this need. Therefore, the Court determined that rather than imposing a knowledge standard, like the 10th Circuit Court did, motive was enough to violate Title VII since Abercrombie knew or suspected that Elauf wore the headscarf for religious reasons and did not want to accommodate her. “An employer may not make an applicant’s religious practice, confirmed or otherwise, a factor in employment decisions” (EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch, Inc., 2015). Finally, the Court held because of the description that Title VII gives for religion, it places religion as a protected class and therefore asks that it be given favored treatment over other

    Read More

  • Case Study Of Griggs Vs. Duke Power Company

    644 Words  | 2 Pages

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 forbids workplace discrimination based on religion, national origin, race, color, or sex. Companies and unions should be mainly thoughtful to possible harassment or discrimination against Muslim, Arab, Afghani, Middle Eastern or South Asian people.

    Read More

  • Critical Analysis: Understanding Religion in the Workplace

    775 Words  | 2 Pages

    Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits intentional discrimination on the basis of religion and requires an employer to make reasonable efforts to accommodate religious practices of employees unless doing so would cause undue hardship to employer. Overall the number of EEOC cases with regard to religious discrimination has nearly doubled from 1997 where the reported cases were 1709 annually to 3721 cases in 2012 (US EEOC, 2012). The rise of cases in the US is primarily due to further diversity in the workplace and the employees embracing expressions of faith. Examples of religious discrimination in the workplace are varied from the basis of one’s dress or clothing, refrain from working Sabbath or religious holidays or antagonism between cultural or religious groups leading to harassment. Management strategies need to be identified and discussed with employees in the same manner as other components of employer’s diversity policy. The following is an example of a request for time off work to observe the Sabbath. In EEOC v. Thompson Contracting, Grading, Paving, and Utilities, Inc., No. 11-1897, the EEOC sued the company for failing to accommodate a request to not work Saturdays made by an employee who alleged he followed the Hebrew Israelite faith (Jones and Erickson, 2013). After Mr. Yisrael refused to work three different Saturdays, Thompson terminated his employment. Mr. Yisrael then filed a complaint with the EEOC. The job as a dump truck driver was infrequently called to work Saturdays but did so due to recent weather conditions. The employer would have had to hire substitute drivers for the time frame in order to cover his shift. In so doing, the employer would be incurring additional costs beyond normal ...

    Read More

  • Religious Accommodation Policy Change

    758 Words  | 2 Pages

    In January 1986, S. Simcha Goldman filed a lawsuit and fought for freedom of religious expression for service members after receiving disciplinary action for failure to comply with uniform regulation while working as a medical officer in a military hospital (Military law review, 1986). This lawsuit eventually landed in the Supreme Court, and led to Chief Justice Warren E. Burger to question, “Where the logic of religious exemptions from the dress code would stop, in a nation with hundreds of denominations” ("High court pondering," 1986).

    Read More

  • No Excuse for Religious Discrimination

    517 Words  | 2 Pages

    Religious Discrimination according to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, involves treating a person (applicant or employee) unfavorably because of his or her religious beliefs. It can also involve treating someone differently because that person is married to or associated with an individual of a particular religion or because of his or her connection with a religious organization/group. Today, most twenty-first century managers are familiar with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which states that failing or refusing to accommodate an employee’s religious practices, or taking adverse employment action based on a person’s religion can result in charges of discrimination (EEOC). Therefore, managers should not use or inquire about an individual’s religious beliefs unless an accommodation is requested.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Dress Codes

    449 Words  | 1 Pages

    Dress codes are essentials for all schools across America. Dress codes will set the tone for students to be safe because they will help reduce violence, increase student safety, and provide a positive learning environment.

    Read More

  • Heald College Dress Code

    2096 Words  | 5 Pages

    Heald College dress code can offer their students a professional outlook. The professional dress policy can help students to be prepared for a work atmosphere setting. It can help them be comfortab...

    Read More

  • Gender Inequality Essay

    1299 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ledbetter started working for Goodyear Tire Co. in 1979; she had been working there for about twenty years and there was no job she could not do. In 1998 she received an anonymous tip saying that she was being paid much less than the male worker. She was being paid $44,700 a year while the male workers were getting paid twenty-five percent more (Reah, 2008). Goodyear prohibited its employees from discussing their pay. Ledbetter took the situation to court. The discrimination was violating Title VII which prohibits discrimination in the workforce based on race and sex (NWLC, 2013). After she filed a complaint with the EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission), her case went to trial, and the jury awarded her backpay and approximately $3.3 million in compensatory and punitive damages for the extreme nature of the pay discrimination to which she had been subjected (NWLC, 2013). Goodyear claimed “Ledbetter had to had filed a pay discrimination claim within 180 days of first discriminatory paycheck even though she did not know about the discrimination” (Reah, 2008); the Supreme Court agreed with Goodyear’s claim and ruled against

    Read More

  • Dress Codes In the School System

    1401 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... answer, other options should be considered. If the students that are breaking the dress code are those that are regularly in trouble, then having a dress code is simply giving them another rule not to follow, while giving the rest of the kids one more rule to adhere to. Clothes will not change the violent behaviors we see in school; therefore, let's spend more time worrying about bigger issues such as academic performance, better discipline policies and creating a better climate at our learning institutions.

    Read More

  • Discrimination Against Women In The Workplace Essay

    1172 Words  | 3 Pages

    Proper education of employees and management teams can help combat this. George N. Root III of Demand Media, author of How do I Prevent Discrimination in the Workplace, as published in the Houston Chronicle Small Business section (Root, n.d.) makes several suggestions on how businesses can take steps to combat and avoid discrimination in the workplace. He suggests working with a business attorney who has experience in discrimination policies to develop a comprehensive discrimination policies and procedures manual for employees. He also suggests that this manual should be gone over with management staff, explaining the policies, encouraging questions, and having them sign a form saying they took the training and understand it. He also recommends that employees be required to review the manual and attend quarterly training on discrimination in the workplace. They too should sign a form saying that they took the training and understand it. In cases where discrimination is deliberate, this also informs the parties who are performing the discriminatory behavior that their actions are illegal and what the consequences will be if it

    Read More

  • Why Do Uniforms Wear School Uniforms

    787 Words  | 2 Pages

    As uniforms were required in most schools in the past, we all know it was also a trending fashion in work environments for various reasons. Although we can see more freedom about dress codes in recent years, we were stricter in this regard in the past, as we just come to realize it. It was a mandatory dress code almost in every school across the World. As times have changed along with our culture, work ethics along with technology, we are now discussing whether to go back to uniform days. Making it a mandatory again in most schools as it is getting out of hand with economical differences of families, internet and fashion. As these facts are

    Read More

More about Bhatia V. Chevron Case Study

Open Document