Betty G. Farrell's Family: Idea Institution, And Controversy?

1393 Words3 Pages

Queston # 5: In her 5th paragraph, Farrell discusses our fear of change. How does this fear of change connect to the practice of scapegoating? Identify some social scapegoats of the last century. For what were they blamed and why? Who represents the “forces of the new” today? I think we all tend to blame something or somebody when things turn out badly; however, what happens when such blame involves an innocent subject? And the reason behind it is because of fear of the unknown future—a.k.a change. In the Modern Scholar essay, “Family: Idea, Institution, and Controversy,” Betty G. Farrell discusses the social and political structures that influences our concept of family; one of the influences are the political “scapegoats” caused by the …show more content…

I wonder why. Maybe because “scapegoating” speaks to the paranoia in all of us: the anti-immigrant or the anti-minority, the bigot or the conformist—the side of us that fear change because we have gotten too comfortable in our own little world. Maybe because it also speaks to our self-denial, to stick to such ideology that somebody else is responsible for our failure and misfortune, instead of facing our own individual responsibility and moral obligation. I truly do not understand such ideology; however, one thing I have fully understood—the society makes it seem as if embracing change can be pretty …show more content…

One definition is “a significant social group in society typically consisting of one or two parents and their children.” While such definition is a good starting point, some modern family structures are excluded by such definition. In her essay, “Family: Idea, Institution, and Controversy,” Betty Farrell apparently assumes that the traditional family has dramatically changed, and the dynamics of change—altered the definition of a “family.” A family is no longer a picture of a particular image of the mythic past, referring to the golden days of the “1950s.” It is no longer a father, mother and their biological children living together under one roof (and certainly not with the a breadwinner father and a stay-at-home mother). In today 's modern society, it is now common to see women raising their children by themselves without their husbands’ help; unmarried couples living together; and gay and lesbian couples—while far from being universally accepted—adopting and raising children to complete their families. Therefore, despite the children living in one-parent households, or they do not live with their “married-heterosexual-biological-parents” under the same roof—does not necessarily mean they are not families. Farrell states that “a family is defined not so much by a particular set of people as by the quality of relationships that bind them together.” In other words, Farrell believes that a “family” is more than just a collection

Open Document