Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The story of bernie madoff
Summary of the Bernie Madoff case
The story of bernie madoff
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The story of bernie madoff
Case Presentation: Bernard Lawrence Madoff
“Robbing Peter to pay Paul”, Bernard Madoff king of financial fraud will be serving 150 years in prison for running his Ponzi scheme. Now why such a big price to pay for running a Ponzi scheme? Bernard Madoff also referred to as “Bernie Madoff”, was charged with committing eleven charges, including robbery of thirteen thousand five hundred and eighty of his clients. The Bernie Madoff case made waves because it brought attention to how un-educated and unprepared the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was for anything of this matter.
How did this massive collapse of the sixty-five billion dollar Ponzi Scheme even begin? Bernie Madoff saved up five thousand dollars from a job he had as a lifeguard, in nineteen sixty he opened a firm with the money he saved. The Firm helped create the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (NASDAQ) In which he held chair from nineteen ninety through nineteen thirty. Madoff’s firm became profitable by exploiting the wealthy Jewish communities. Bernie became very involved with his Jewish fellowmen he knew at his local synagogue, where he would invite them to let him invest their money and then as the pyramid grows those men brought in men they knew to also let Madoff invest their money. He promised high rates of returns to his
…show more content…
The case was closed without ever opening formal investigation, due to no ‘evidence of fraud’. The SEC according to Markopolos stated that the SEC people are “…Totally untrained in finance; they’re unschooled; they’re un-credentialed. Most of them are just merely lawyers without any financial industry experience.” They were trained in checking every piece of paper perfectly and finding misdemeanors but they will miss all financial felonies that are occurring, because they never look
While the widely exposed and discussed trials of WorldCom's and Tyco's top executives were all over the media, one of the most interesting cases of securities fraud was happening without any public acknowledgement.
It took for the losing in the case with two Bear Stearns hedge fund managers for the government to realize that there was a problem within their justice system. If they couldn’t take down two people accused of deceiving investors, how did they assume that they would be able to take down numerous high-end executives within Wall Street? So in fall 2009, over a year after the initial hit of the financial crisis, Obama introduced the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task to oversee prosecution for fraud and financial crime a week before the hearing to discuss ’08 financial crisis prosecution. With such a department now put in place, the government believed they could go back and review the “fraud” that took place within Wall Street years before and place a blame somewhere, revealing another flaw of the US government and justice system. The government wasn’t taking the cases as serious as they should have. They weren’t finding ways to filter through Due Diligence underwriters and they weren’t calling forth whistleblowers. They were losing the case before it could even
This case is based on Mrs. Jennifer Sharkey, who sued J.P. Morgan & Co. (JCMC), Mr. Kenny, Mr. Green, and Mrs. Lassiter, alleging breach of contract and violations of the SOX anti-retaliation statute. The facts started when Mrs. Sharkey was assigned to a Suspect Client 's account where members of JPMC expressed to her their concern regarding to this account because they suspected that the Suspect Client was involved in illegal activities. After Mrs. Sharkey’s investigation, she claimed that she informed her conclusions to superiors Mr. Kenny, Mr. Green, and Mrs. Lassiter, of the Suspect Client 's potential unlawful activities, such as: money laundering, mail fraud, bank engaged in fraud, and violations of federal securities laws. After
The Bernie Madoff Ponzi Scheme is a well-known case and is known as one of the biggest Ponzi scheme’s. In summary the scheme occurred for many reasons that I will some up into 3 points; A lack in competency by regulatory agencies, a lack of regulation, and finally a breach in ethics by Bernie Madoff himself. To explain further, the regulatory agencies like the lawyers and SEC are supposed to prevent schemes such as this one from happening but because they lacked the skills to correctly assess the situation, interpreting the number of tips they had received regarding scheme that had been filed, and to act on those in an efficient manner. One of the tips was made by Harry Markopolos in 2000, of who correctly predicted that Madoff was guilty of fraud. Even after this tip from Markopolos, Madoff was not arrested until 2009. Many family members were also a part of the fraud along with some non-family members such as Frank DiPascali and a team known as the 17th floor team, who helped Madoff carry out his fraud. The idea behind Madoff’s fraud was that he would produce false statements of their investments and when people wanted to pull out their investments, the money wasn’t actually there, which rightfully rose more than a few eyebrows and ultimately led to his arrest.
Bernard Madoff had full control of the organizational leadership of Bernard Madoff Investments Securities LLC. Madoff used charisma to convince his friends, members of elite groups, and his employees to believe in him. He tricked his clients into believing that they were investing in something special. He would often turn potential investors down, which helped Bernard in targeting the investors with more money to invest. Bernard Madoff created a system which promised high returns in the short term and was nothing but the Ponzi scheme. The system’s idea relied on funds from the new investors to pay misrepresented and extremely high returns to existing investors. He was doing this for years; convincing wealthy individuals and charities to invest billions of dollars into his hedge fund. And they did so because of the extremely high returns, which were promised by Madoff’s firm. If anyone would have looked deeply into the structure of his firm, it would have definitely shown that something is wrong. This is because nobody can make such big money in the market, especially if no one else could at the time. How could one person, Madoff, hold all of his clients’ assets, price them, and manage them? It is clearly a conflict of interest. His company was showing high profits year after year; despite most of the companies in the market having losses. In fact, Bernard Madoff’s case is absolutely stunning when you consider the range and number of investors who got caught up in it.
In modern times, society is still burdened by individuals seeking to get rich quick. Names such as Marty Frankel and Robert Rooney, with their modern form of the Ponzi scheme, have appeared in the news. Although modern con-artists may enjoy the short success Ponzi did, none may ever possess the charm, the demeanor, or the ability to touch the hearts of individuals intended to be swindled.
Bernie Madoff is one of the greatest conman in history. The Bernie Madoff scandal takes the gold as one of the top ponzi scheme in America. Madoff started the Wall Street firm, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, in 1960. Starting off as a penny stock trader with five thousand dollars, earned from his workings as a lifeguard and sprinkler installer, his firm began to grow with the support of his father-in-law, Saul Alpern, who helped by referred a group of close friends and family. Originally, his firm made markets by the National Quotations Bureau’s Pink Sheets. However, in order to compete with the bigger firms that were trading on the New York Stock Exchange floor, his firm started to use very intelligent computer software that help distributed their quotes in second’s rater then minutes. This software later became the NASDAQ that we know today. In December of 2008 Bernard Madoff confessed that he had embezzling billions of dollars from investors. It is estimated to have lasted nearly two decades, and stolen approximately $64.8 billion. On December 11, 2008 he was arreste...
Merrill Lynch and Credit Suisse claimed they didn’t know the actual financial situation of Enron. They defensed that there’s no substantial evidence to verify that investment banks played a significant role in the Enron scandal. However, to pursue own profits these banks may have conducted improper acts to mislead investors. They obviously would like to settle out of the court and avoid a lawsuit which will damage their reputation greatly.
Bernie Madoff, “a former American stock broker, investment advisor, non-executive chairman of the NASDAQ stock market, and the admitted operator of what has been described as the largest Ponzi scheme in the history of the world”. (Bernard Madoff, 2011, para. 1) Bernie was able to convince investors to give him large sums of money with the promise that they would received between eight percent to twelve percent return a year. Bernie ran a pyramid scheme where Bernie kept the large sums of money for himself, and then he used the new investors funds to pay off the o...
In 2010, the Security and Exchange Commission accused Goldman Sachs of committing security fraud and misleading investors with Abacus 2007-AC1. The SEC claimed that Goldman Sachs sold mortgages at inflated prices which they felt were going to fail to their clients and then bet against those mortgages. So, Goldman finally had to pay around $550 million to settle the charges.
The SEC’s mandate “The mission of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is to protect investors, maintain fair, orderly, and efficient markets, and facilitate capital formation.” (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission: What We Do, 2016). When we consider the Enron and Madoff scandals and the stunning collapse of several large U.S. investment banks in 2008, one has to conclude that the SEC failed in fulfilling its basic mission. From one perspective, the effects of the Enron and Madoff scandals pale in comparison to the global magnitude of the 2008 financial crisis.
This case illustrated that there were real consequences to white collar crime. In addition to paying the fifty million dollar fine, he relinquished another fifty million dollars of his illegal trading profits. (He still had millions remaining, however, from his illegal gains.) His actual prison sentence was three years, yet he served only twenty-two months in the federal prison at Lompoc, California, which was known to have a “country-club” atmosphere.
When put in an ethical situations, people use different reasoning’s’ and perspectives to resolve their problems to their advantage. There was nobody validating what was going on. This brings the ethical conflict of Andy Fastow into play; one of the key problems within Enron. Andy Fastow was the man keeping Enron 's “successful” business appearance. While the company was $30 billion in debt, Fastow manipulated the books to make it look like they were still making profits. Fastow might have not been the one to begin the fraudulent activities, but he did it in order to please his bosses. He created two partnerships called LJM1 and LJM2; with the plan of buying Enron’s poorly performing stock to improve their financial statements. Additionally, Fastow went in front of the board of directors to exempt himself to run the two companies as well as Enron, aka conflict of interest. According to the documentation, Fastow allegedly collected $30 million in management fees while defrauding his own
...ss. As fraudulent audit reports were presented to investors showing above market returns to keep capital coming in, actual losses kept compounding and Samuel Israel could not do anything to reverse them. The situation finally became too dire to handle and the fund entered bankruptcy while Mr. Israel and his two closest associates were sentenced to some of the harshest white-collar punishments of the time period.
What is the possible meaning of the change in stock prices for Berkshire Hathaway and Scottish Power plc on the day of acquisition announcement? Specifically, what does the $2.55 billion gain in Berkshire’s market value of equity imply about the intrinsic value of PacifiCorp?