Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Open door policy in china essay
The advantages and disadvantages of fdi in china
Foreign direct investment in china example
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Open door policy in china essay
According to China history, foreign direct investments were appears and started in China when their governments diminished the isolation policy which has been adopted by China after 30 years. Following the defeat in the Chia-Wu war with Japan, China start to open their coastal city to foreign direct investor after signed the ‘treaty of Shimonoseki’ (Dunning & Narula, 1996, p.418). Their domestic markets were dramatically improved when China start to decentralize the corporate decision making and development of market mechanism. When China changes their economic system to open-door policy in 1978, foreign direct investment (FDI) in China was grown significantly in the Chinese economic system. China become a largest FDI recipient in developing world and globally and surpassed US with the FDI inflows of $36 billion, at the end of 2005, cumulative FDI was $622 billion (Kevin, 2006, p.2). In order to gain more knowledge and improvement of ideologies, China chooses FDI as the best way to growth of their economy rapidly. The most important benefits of FDI were their economy and industry improved because through FDI, China gain the foreign capital, use an advanced technology and skilful labour. This is because skilful labours are needed and important in the industry to produce worth and high quality output. As a result, FDI inflows includes 7% of gross capital formation, 21% foreign-invested enterprises (FIEs), 28% of industrial output produced by FIEs; and 57% China exports were also come from FIEs ( Kevin, 2006, p.2).
Roles of FDI
FDI main role is to promote the economic development by increase the capital stock and augmenting employment. These statements were argued by Balasubramanyam et. Al (1996, 1999) and de Mello (1997, 1999) whi...
... middle of paper ...
... proven that FDI successful in china to improve the economic growth if they compare to the previous time when they still use an isolation policy.
But, based on the Marxist critique, FDI also give bad effect on China because multinational is exploitation mechanism because it control the country to develop by western industrialize country (Kevin, 2006, p.5). These arguments supported because FDI not only close and small the gap between domestic investment and savings, but also make it become lower. In a long run, FDI can reduce the profit of foreign exchange of capital and accounts. In a short run, FDI not create problem so much but it will become worst to the domestic investment and saving in a long run period. The utilization of updated technology and skilful labour will block the development of local firms when the foreign firms exist in the Chinese economy market
Sitting close to the edge of being a “developing” and a “developed” country, China is a difficult country to define neatly. It is a country with an ancient and traditional culture trying to position itself higher within the international community. Plus it is also a communist country that has come to embrace its own form of capitalism to fuel its economy. China’s economic boon has been beneficial to many people within the country. But not to all people within China evenly.
Globalization has caused the world to change. Our country, China has been dramatically changed by globalization. Our people have moved to cities, and our industry has exploded. We have had huge advances in technology along with education improvement. Despite the fact that China has changed so much, there are still many issues that plague it. China faces serious environmental concerns. New diseases and viruses that are not indigenous to China can cause a wide range of sickness in the new area. Despite some of the the improvements in China that are a result of globalization, the negatives that globalization has brought to China are more than the benefits.
In accordance with remittances, direct monetary profit from the overseas Chinese has also come from the aspect of foreign direct investment (FDI). As Newland and Patrick explain that, “China has long worked to attract direct investment and open trade opportunities through overseas Chinese communities.” (Newland and Patrick 5) Arguably, that policy towards the diaspora has been used by the PRC for developing its economy domestically and internationally. This is because as Newland and Patrick further explain, remittances and foreign direct investment influence, “the incidence of poverty in their home countries, market development (including outsourcing of production), technology transfer, philanthropy, tourism, political contributions, and more intangible flows of knowledge, new attitudes, and cultural influence” (Newland and Patrick iv).
Coates, B., Horton, D., & McNamee, L. (2014, January 1). CHINA: PROSPECTS FOR EXPORT-DRIVEN GROWTH. Economic Roundup Issue 4. Department of the Treasury (Australia).
by a world power can be felt by practically every nation of the globe involved
One of the most well accepted models of FDI is Buckley and Casson’s (1976) internalisation theory, who developed a model of MNCs and FDIs centered around the interrelationship between market imperfections, knowledge and the internalisation of production and consumption (Buckley and Casson, 2009). Specifically, the theory recognized that multinational corporations are both horizontally and vertically organized, and that the “the vertically integrated firm internalises a market for an intermediate product, just as the horizontal MNE [multinational enterprise] internalises markets for proprietary assets” (Caves, 1996: p.13). In addition, internalisation will occur, and multinational corporations will expand only as far as the advantages, including barriers to entry, are not offset by the costs of control, communi...
Another negative aspect of globalization that can be closely linked to the settlement of MNCs and FDI in China and the exploitation of its resources is that the returns of the investment placed in China or the money made by the MNCs is fully returned to the home country of the MNC. When MNCs settle in China, they do pay a corporate tax to the Chinese government. The benefits of this to the government is that they will charge them corporate taxes and have jobs in the labor force created. However, the profits made by these MNCs do not retain in China and are sent back to their home country. This implies that the MNCs simply exploit the resources available in China such as cheap labor and low production costs and do not fully return benefits to the Chinese people. This also creates a loss of economic sovereignty and loss of economic security in China as its resources are being used up and it is not
From the 1970s, there has been a wave of liberalization in China, which was introduced by Deng Xiaoping. This is one of the key reasons to the rise of China to be one of the economic giants in the world. In the last 25 years of the century, the Chinese economy has had massive economic growth, which has been 9.5 percent on a yearly basis. This has been of great significance of the country since it quadrupled the gross domestic product (GDP) of the country thus leading to saving of 400 million of their citizens from the threats of poverty. In the late 1970s, China was ranked twentieth in terms of trade volumes in the whole world as well as being predicted to be the world’s top nation concerning trading activities (Kaplan, 53). This further predicted the country to record the highest GDP growth in the whole world.
In the year 2007, China and India ranked first and second respectively in the list of ideal foreign direct investment (FDI) destinations, according to A T Kearney, a global strategic management consulting firm (The Press Trust of India Limited, 2007a). The two nations, because of their similarities in geopolitical, economic and demographic aspects, are often compared with each other. To determine which one is more attractive for businesses to expand to, this essay will examine the business environment of both countries from the following perspectives: political/legal, economic, socio-cultural and technological.
China's development is praised by the whole world. Its developments are not only in the economic aspect, but as well in its foreign affairs. Compared with other developed countries, China is a relatively young country. It began constructing itself in 1949. After 30 years of growth, company ownership had experienced unprecedented changes. Entirely, non-state-owned companies can now be more involved in sectors that used to be monopolized by state-owned companies.
...nce material of this article is limited, and cannot be discussed ‘why investment has become to a trend in China’ in depth.
Foreign Direct Investment ( FDI) is a source that a country obtain from other countries in order to add value for it’s own economy. These sources can be various: Economic or technological. Foreign Investors may establish a new facility or open their branch or establish a partnership with a local company in host country. Nowadays, there is more demand of FDI’s than the world trade and world output. This drastic rise in FDI is due to the help of changing potentials and economic policies that are happening in the developing countries worldwide (Alesina and Dollar, 2000).Investors are more likely to invest their money on more profitable places,it would not be reasonable for companies to invest on less profitable countries. Moreover, the
The reason is to take advantage of the exchange goods and the services produced in the field of specialization of a country which has the comparative advantage in each of the country itself. This specialization will be improving the living standards of a country. While foreign direct investment is considered as the main element for the industrial development and economic growth of a hostcountry. According to Rosa Portela Forte , " Foreign direct investment (FDI) influences the host country’s economic growth through the transfer of new technologies, formation of human resources, integration in global markets, increase of competition, and firms’ development and reorganization". In a previous study on the economic activity between countries and the international trade, there are two aspects of possibility of a chain between FDI with the trade.
In the race to be the best, China is clearly outperforming the United States. China has strong economic fundamentals¬ such as “a high savings rate, huge labor pool, and powerful work ethic” (Rachman, Gideon. "Think Again: American Decline). Their economy has grown an astonishing 9-10% over the past thirty years; almost double of what it used to be decades ago. China is also the “world’s greatest manufacturer and its greatest market” (Rachman). The continuing growth of China's economy is a source of concern for not only the U.S. but surrounding nations as well. One could argue that the U.S. need not worry about China’s growth because of the spread of globalization and that western ideologies would influence China to turn to democracy. Yet China has still managed to “incorporate censorship and one party rule with continuing economic success” (Rachman) and remains a communist country. Hypothetically, even if China does resort to a democratic state, this does not gua...
This FDI that China loses to India results in an unbiased growth of factor endowments i.e. they are increasing at the same rate