Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages of the trait theory of leadership
Example of trait theories of leadership
Advantages of the trait theory of leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Advantages of the trait theory of leadership
focus on. In addition to the great man/ woman theory, the trait theory investigated the effects that specific traits had on the determination of the greatness of a leader, but much like the first theory, this is somewhat narrow and only focuses on one aspect of the person that can predict greatness and effectiveness as a leader.
Nonetheless, the 1940’s led to an increase in the research of the behavioural leadership theories which claim that all leaders possessed certain behavioural characteristics in common. Much of the research was done in the University of Michigan and Ohio State whereby self examination tests were given to participants to determine the relationship between the two variables. These researches then lead to discovery of 4 types of leadership behaviours:
• Initiating structure: “leader behaviours that define, organize, and structure the work situation” (Riggio, 2009, p.345)
• Consideration: these are the types of behaviours whereby the leaders “show a concern for the
…show more content…
For example, for a country club manager, the type of behaviour that would be effective supportive behaviour simply because it is worker focused and the well being of the workers are ensured as well as a good working relationship between the manager and the work group. Having said the above there are advantages and disadvantages to each of the behaviours although they are effective in organisational basis.
Similarly a development of a theory that “matches characteristics of a situation” (Riggio, 2009, p.356) in which a leader made their decisions highly impacted the success of the organisation. This good model is called the Decision- Making Model developed by Vroom and colleagues in 1973& 1988. Research that has been supportive of this model includes a study that was done to examine if work- related decisions made by managers were effective, this had statically significant results thus proving the efficiency of the
...too much command. If leaders have uncontrollable power with no control then they will most certainly try to hide the disastrous times and elongate the superior. I would have to say that at the end of the day leaders are only as good their employees. This is how I concluded that leaders don’t matter.
Tannenbaum, R. and Schmidt, W.H. (1958) How to choose a leadership pattern, Institute of industrial relations.
2.Trait Theories: trait theories assume that people inherit perticullar qualities and traits that make them better for best leadership. Trait theories identify particular personality or behavioral characteristics shared by leaders. For example, extra version, self-confidence, and encourage are all traits that could potentially its linked to great leaders and ledearship.If particular reasons are key features of leadership, then how we know or judge people who possess those qualities are not leaders?.
Trait theorists believe that leaders are born that way and leadership is part of an individuals DNA. In the 19th century, Thomas Carlyle, a historian proposed “The Great Man Theory” based on his research of many great men such as Gandhi, Lincoln, and Alexander the Great. He believed that these men were destined ...
A leader must know how to read and understand his or her constituents. It is important to remember one must treat others in the same manner that they would like to be treated. This golden nugget is a wealth of wonderful knowledge wrapped up in such a small sentence. Often, leaders will rise to the top and forget this time and tried excerpt. They may not forget it all the time, but do in critical situations where it could make a world of difference. Leaders can treat people with a higher respect just by following this little rule.
Lord, R. (2000). Leadership. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology, vol. 4. (pp. 499-505). Doi:10.1037/10519-216
The trait theory of leadership is the idea that people are born with certain character traits. This is the style that is attributed to a leader who others see as “a born leader”, it gives more credence to the qualities a person is born with rather than what they develop or the relationships they develop with followers, hence trait leadership focuses on the leader and not the followers or the situation. This theory assumes that if you could identify people with the correct traits, you will be able to identify leaders.(Roberts). Good leadership traits include:
These theories propose that different behaviors differentiate between leaders and nonleaders. An Ohio State Study determined the two main behaviors that leaders need are initiating structure and consideration (Robbins). They found that people who demonstrate these two behavior types tend to be better leaders. Companies can train their leaders on these two important behaviors by investing in leadership training such as courses, workshops, and team building exercises.
The Trait Theory points out that there is a certain type of person making a good leader, with the decisive factor being: having or not having distinctive qualities of being a leader. Despite that, being an effective leader can still be a challenge. External and internal influences impact the effectiveness of the program and must be considered in order to succeed. Which leads us to the Behavioural Theory, thinking of what a good leader actually does. Kurt Lewin developed three leadership types, such as the autocratic leader who is a maker, someone who makes decisions without consultation with others.
The Traits theory, otherwise known as the Great Man theory, is the origination of leadership theories. This theory believes that there is a unique set of qualities for a leader, mainly: his intelligence and ability to judge, his knowledge power, self-confidence and dependabil...
In my view, people employ certain traits that differentiate us from our neighbor next door, and leadership is no different. The test produced by the University of Kent in the United Kingdom (University of Kent, n.d.) has developed a process that I feel accurately defines what sort of leader you are based on 50 simple questions. I was not surprised by the results and found them to be quite accurate and expected. In this essay, I will explore why I feel the test is an accurate way to determine your leadership style due to my personal experience with
My biggest personal leadership failure occurred earlier this year when I worked at Einstein Bros Bagels at Coffman Union. I stayed there from January until April making and serving bagels to customers. However, I had the morning shift, the busiest period of the day. Long lines would form every time I was there, and sometimes I couldn’t catch up. One day in April, my co-worker, a veteran making bagels, was absent, and someone who didn’t have as much experience replaced her. What followed was a mess. My team chemistry with the replacement was dreadful, and a ton of people had to wait a while for their orders. My manager saw the incident, and after my shift was over, he gave me the option of leaving my job. I accepted, but my self-confidence was in a state that was beyond repair. It was one of the first times that I felt I let others down with my work performance. I learned that I shouldn’t expect to be great at everything and that I should analyze my weaknesses before taking on something challenging.
Trait theories are theories that consider personal qualities and characteristics that differentiate leaders from nonleaders." Early results aimed at confirming this theory were inconclusive. Many research studies were conducted and each identified key traits supposed to differentiate leaders from nonleaders. The problem is that they didn't get the same results, thus failing to discover common traits, which should have shown in each research study. When applying the Big Five Personality framework (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability and openness to experience) to the study and research of leadership traits, results were more encouraging. They showed that the most important trait for leaders was extraversion. Still, this founding sh...
Bennis, W. & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The Strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper Row.
The behavior approach refocuses the interest from the traits to the leaders ' behavior. Leaders ' behavior becomes more important than their physical, mental or emotional traits. Ohio State University and the University of Michigan developed the two main studies of this approach in the late 1940s and 1950s. The studies have recognized two main behaviors: people-oriented and production-oriented behavior. According to the leader behavior approach, there are several behaviors that would be invariably effective for leaders, but empirical research does not show a strong relation between task-oriented or person-oriented leader behaviors and leader effectiveness.