Battle Of The Ants Analysis

1274 Words3 Pages

Comparison and Contrast of Thoreau and Woolf Both Henry David Thoreau’s “The Battle of the Ants” and Virginia Woolf’s “The Death of the Moth” are about life and death, but they approach the topic with different perspectives. Thoreau writes about an exciting battle of ants and uses personification to relate it to the excitement of real human battles, while Woolf writes in respect about a moth who has death unexpectedly creep up on it and describes how little the moth is in comparison to the rest of life and how it fights to live. In both writings the ants and moth are fighting against death so that they may live, but the ants are fighting visible opponents that are trying to kill them and the moth is fighting natural death. Thoreau uses personification to show excitement and exhilaration over the battle of the ants and uses diction that describes the ants as if …show more content…

Woolf writes that the moth is flying back and forth on the window sill, but it has become stiff and awkward, so that it cannot fly across. The narrator watches the moth attempt to fly across the window sill seven times, but it always fails. The moth is in a battle against death and it keeps fighting a fight it cannot win against a fated outcome. The fact that the narrator takes the time to watch the moth repeatedly try to fly and fail, shows that the narrator is cheering for it to succeed. The narrator is not watching for the excitement or entertainment of battle like in the “The Battle of the Ants.” The narrator watches it because she admires and respects its will to live and fight honorably against death, because of this the narrator is more emotionally connected. The narrator shows pity for the dying moth and wants to help it by extending a pencil to help the moth right itself, but comes to the realization that this is the approach of death and nothing can be

Open Document