Battle Of Agincourt Research Paper

1089 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Analysis of the battle of agincourt

“For he to-day that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother” -King Henry V (Fraser). King Henry V of England has prepared his troops for an honorable death in battle with his final speech, and now on St. Crispin’s day, in the year 1415, the battle of Agincourt begins. Outnumbered by thousands, the battle became a story of an extraordinary English victory and a shameful defeat for the French, but little did they know that the French unknowingly contributed to their own loss. The Battle of Agincourt was won by the English with a strategic placement of troops, but also because the French failed to strike the English where they were weakest. To begin the battle, the French attempted to distract the archers from a main attack by sending cavalry …show more content…

There were several uncoordinated charges, all of which failed to serve their purpose of distracting the English archers (“Battle of Agincourt”). The attacks aimed at the archers were stopped by sharpened stakes placed in the ground before the archers, blocking the cavalry from reaching them (Ellis-Peterson and Fraser). Originally, the French planned to use the cavalry as a distraction to keep the archers from shooting on a main attack, but mud, stakes and arrows easily countered the charges (Cornwell; Devries and Dickie and Dougherty and Jestice and Jorgensen 182). The French started off with a weak start, but their carelessness in strategizing and planning their attacks would only cause them more trouble later on in the battle. The pileup of French soldiers in the battlefield caused no trouble for the English since they had no means to advance, but it greatly affected the French soldiers trying to …show more content…

Since the cavalry charges failed, there was no distraction to keep the English from shooting on the French’s main attack. Because their distraction had failed, the French lines were struck repeatedly by arrows as they advanced (Cornwell). Many French soldiers were killed by arrows during the advancement , which caused a pileup in the middle of the battlefield that hindered the progression of the French army (Ellis-Peterson and Fraser). Many French soldiers drowned in the muddy field unable to get up due to crowding while others were struck by arrows (Ellis-Peterson and Fraser). Horses of the fallen cavalry, maddened by pain charged back into the French lines causing confusion and killing some soldiers while also disrupting their formation (Glanz). Sending the cavalry at the archers was a mistake on the French’s behalf, since they lost their distraction and also complicated the advancement of their own army. Their attempts to distract the archers from a main attack only made it harder for the soldiers to advance, which gave the English to kill them with their

Show More
Related

  • Henry V, An Ideal Machiavellian Ruler

    1041 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... all of these are examples of when Henry V cried out to God, the most powerful example takes place when the war is finally over. In front of all of his remaining soldiers, he attributes the entire victory of the war to God, telling God to "take it.. for it is none but thine" (4.8.113-114).

    Read More

  • George Washington Commander In Chief

    1390 Words  | 3 Pages

    Braddock was appointed by King George III to lead an army against the French. Washington tried to convince Braddock that they would lose if they fought using the standard British field tactics that Braddock was accustomed to. Washington realized that since there were no open fields in the Ohio Valley, this style of battle would be unsuccessful. The Indians, who sided with the French, because they thought that the British would lose the war, fought using guerilla warfare. Braddock did not listen to Washington and the English were badly defeated.

    Read More

  • What is Right and Wrong with Bernard Cornwell's Sharpe's Regiment

    2010 Words  | 5 Pages

    ...n such a serous need for troops as Wellington marched in with over 50,000 men. A loss of just 3,700 men would not make the major impact the army the books leads you to believe. This would meant the book did get parts of the battle correct in the way of the description of the British tactics. The British did come in from the flank and make the French forces run. The book was incorrect in the fact the Sharpe would have been so desperate for more troops because the British suffered pretty light casualty’s.

    Read More

  • The Battle of Crecy

    406 Words  | 1 Pages

    On the day of the battle the English were in a defensive position awaiting the attack of the French forces at a place known as Crecy Ridge. The English armies were "trained, disciplined, well-armed and confident" meanwhile the Frenchmen and Geonese were "largely untrained, hastily collected and lacking cohesion" (Burne 186). The English were also thought to have had a crude form of a cannon, the first ever used in a battle. They also had excellent archers who easily defeated many of the French cross bowmen and knights from a distance with a longbow. The English win was enormous, and it is said that "Phillip VI fled the battlefield" (Allmand 15).

    Read More

  • Henry V - Film

    943 Words  | 2 Pages

    From the very first battle at Harfleur Branagh's low opinion of war is shown. When we first see the fighting, it is dusk and the sky is further darkened by smoke, instantly creating a morbid feeling. Combined with the muddy and wet terrain, the cheerless soldiers and the overbearing size of the castle which they hope to achieve, it is clear not only that the English army must fight against all the odds to win, but that even the conditions are detrimental to the English cause.The scene where Bardolph, Nym and Pistol are backing away from the battle to save themselves is an important inclusion to the film. Had Branagh intended the film to be a glorification of war, this small scene could have easily been removed. However, he chose to keep it in his film because it actually assists the message which he attempts to convey. This scene, although still clearly comical, as Shakespeare intended it to be, it implies that not all soldiers are valiant and brave and that war is so terrible that soldiers are willing to desert their friends and fellow countrymen because of the hideous nature of war.After the battle of Harfluer is won by the English and they begin to make their way towards Agincourt, Branagh seizes the opportunity to show the viewer the 'victorious' army.

    Read More

  • Benedict Arnold

    681 Words  | 2 Pages

    This gallant effort single handedly got the retreating American troops into a charge against the enemy, which in the end created a victory for the Americans and convinced the French to enter the war.

    Read More

  • The Meuse Argonne Offense

    833 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout the years we have heard stories of the Meuse Argonne Offense and all the casualties it created, but it has never been specific facts of the events that happen. There were approximate 600,000 troops for the offense. That is without counting the artillery part which it was an extra 3,980 personnel. This was part of the movement towards the offense that was implemented by General Pershing. Meanwhile they were in route and arrive to the offense General Pershing was not counting in the weather, which it started raining and the soldiers walked the route implemented which it was about 60 miles of mud that did not help the movement to Meuse Argonne and made them an easier target because of their limited mobility and their lack of knowledge of the area (Clodfelter, 2007). The York battalion joins the battle to help with General Pershing’s plan. The Argonne was a valley flanked by thick forest to one side and the Meuse River on the other. This terrain provided an excellent defensive position for five divisions from General Pershing. Flush with victory, Pershing's objectives for the first day of the attack were extremely optimistic and called for his men to break through two major defensive lines dubbed Giselher and Kreimhilde by the Germans. In addition, American forces were hampered by the fact that the majority of the soldiers that were about to participate in the battle had not yet seen combat.

    Read More

  • The Battle of France

    2520 Words  | 6 Pages

    ... many French commanders not even knowing where their own subordinate units were located.11 The French placed their defense in old, outdated tactics of static warfare. Gone were the days of two sides slugging it out against prepared reinforced defense structures. Closely integrating concentrated armor, infantry, and closely supported by aviation assets all combined to crush France in a matter of only six weeks. France was simply not prepared for this new age of warfare.

    Read More

  • Operation Bagration

    1929 Words  | 4 Pages

    Valera states, "Eventually, more than 1,000,000 men fought for this important forest and its moral implications..." (Valera, 34). The Germans, hoping to push the Americans away from Germany, attempted a mix of a strategy of "encirclement" and a "spearhead". Encirclement was a strategy which two or more armies or detachments would go around the enemy forces, provided they were not secured on either flank, and force the enemy to fight on three or more fronts, eventually overwhelming the enemy and winning the battle. The German Armies had used this strategy multiple times, as well as the Allied forces. The most notable uses of this strategy were Stalingrad, against the Germans, the Invasion of France by Germany, and the Siege of Leningrad. Unfortunately for the Germans, the encirclement strategy failed, as the Americans had the opportunity to have supplies airdropped when the weather had calmed down. "Taking advantage of the foggy weather and of the total surprise of the Allies, the Germans penetrated deep into Belgium, creating a dent, or "bulge," in the Allied lines and threatening to break through to the N Belgian plain and seize Antwerp."(Columbia, 2017) The Germans had successfully implemented a spearhead, but had not captured the American lines to their flanks, and allowed the

    Read More

  • Battle At Hastings Research Paper

    961 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of my main focuses has to do with how the formation of the armies of Harold and William shaped the outcome of the Battle at Hastings. While this is not my main point, I will say that it is a major contributing factor. Think for a moment: how could two, almost evenly matched armies meet on the field of battle and yet have such a defined victor? What did William the Conqueror have that King Harold did not. To do this, we must first look at each army in detail.

    Read More

  • French And Indian War

    1218 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ent was a fight between three nations, and until the late 18th century it was not at all certain which one would win. The Indians, especially the Five nations of the Iroquois, were exceptionally good at playing the French and the English against each other in order to maximize their own benefits. The French and Indian War was a guerrilla war of small skirmishes and surprise attacks. The terrain was unfamiliar to both the French and the English; the involvement of the Indian nations as allies in battle made an enormous difference. In fact, some historians have hypothesized that the turning point in the war came when many of the Indian nations changed their war policies and turned their backs on the French. Faced with the greater resources of the British and lacking the advantage of their Indian allies, the French were left with little hope, and soon lost the continent.

    Read More

  • Battle Of Bastogne Essay

    965 Words  | 2 Pages

    On December 20th, 1944 in the small city of Bastogne, American forces surrounded by the enemy. A surprise and final offensive initiated the German force’s to guarantee the outcome of war. The allied forces denied the German force’s success despite having low supplies and being outnumbered. The outcome of the battle came at a large price on both sides. Luckily the they demonstrated what it means to be American Soldier and were victorious in the Siege of Bastogne. With the help of the field artillery came the victory of The Battle of the Bulge.

    Read More

  • Terrain and Weather Analysis: The Battle of Agincourt

    1629 Words  | 4 Pages

    He placed his army at the exit of a funnel of clear terrain. His archers flanked out to use the wood line for concealment. This protected them from mass charge of the French cavalry and positioned Henry V’s army to effectively use the terrain for a defensive position (Barker, 2005). His positioning on the firmer ground forced the French to navigate through difficult terrain while Henry V ordered his archers to reign arrows down into the mix (Curry, Great Battles: Agincourt, 2015). The English took an avenue of approach which situated their front line at the end of a funnel. This enabled them to take advantage of the key terrain on the battlefield, while the French reciprocated by approaching through a lessening amount of open terrain through soft, muddy ground (Curry, 1415 Agincourt: A New History, 2005). However, some French men at arms circled around the back of the battlefield to attack the rearguard. A sufficient number of English protected the rear of the battle, but the French did cause damage to the supplies at the rear. This avenue of Approach enabled the French to ruin some supplies for the English. However, the numbers lost by the French versus the English showed a clear victory by the English army (Rothero,

    Read More

  • Why Did Napoleon Win The Revolutionary War

    532 Words  | 2 Pages

    But the majority of these men were assembled in reserve, far from the front line, which meant that Barclay only had his initial 105,000 soldiers to call upon. At first, Barclay followed orders to engage the French forces, but as he was met with defeat time after time, he ignored orders and retreated east, hoping buy time to gather a greater army with the 400,000 strong from the reserve to match the French in numbers. Several times he attempted to establish strong defensive lines at key strategic locations, but each time Napoleon’s advance was too quick for the Russian army to finish preparations. Thus to save his few men, Barclay was forced to retreat before the French advance. In doing so, Barclay ordered his army to scorch the land; eliminating resources he knew the French force would need to maintain their fighting capability. But although he was successful in saving his troops from annihilation and inflicted considerable casualties among Napoleon’s army with the scorched-earth policy, Barclay’s refusal to engage his soldiers in battle despite pressure from his generals and the Tsar wounded his

    Read More

  • The Longest Day: Book Vs. Movie

    1581 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...es the appearance of the Allied forces. The same scene happens in the book, but it has a much greater effect when it is acted out, as you see just how excited the French were for the Allied forces to show up.

    Read More

More about Battle Of Agincourt Research Paper

Open Document