Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Child abusement
Throughout their childhood and adolescent years, Tyron and Aldwin McNeal shared the same violent, terror filled lives. The boys grew up in South Chicago with their mother, Cynthia Taylor, and her husband and the father of Aldwin, Hertie Jones. Jones was commonly abusive to the boy’s mother; he was a heroin addict, alcoholic and a pimp, even going so far as to force Taylor into prostitution. Growing up, the boys were subject to violence in school, exposed to drugs at a very young age, and were even raped by an elder relative whose charge they were left in. During this time, the boys spent a great deal of time together (Tyron was older by only a year). By the age of 12, both Tyron and Aldwin were drinking and smoking marijuana; it was not long before they began dealing drugs. These trends continued throughout the boys years in middle and high school. However, after dropping out of school in their respective junior and senior years, Aldwin and Tyron’s path’s finally parted ways. Sensing a need for order in his life, joined the Army went to serve in Germany. During his time overseas, he met a pastor and was converted to Christianity. After his service, Tyron went on to get married and find work as a deputy in the Lake County Sheriff’s Department. At the same time Aldwin, unlike Tyron, was unable to turn his life around. While Tyron was serving in the military, Aldwin continued his rebellion through a lifestyle of crime, violence, and eventually murder. After serving 7 years out of a 10 year sentence for armed robbery, Aldwin was released from prison in 1993. Soon after his release, Aldwin was involved in a robbery at Maude’s Pizzeria, where he murdered two men: Cory Gerlach and Perry Austin. During this same period he was also accuse... ... middle of paper ... ...if he is sane. Another way to put this is that one is only morally responsible if he is morally conscious. It is very questionable whether Aldwin was aware of right and wrong. While he was in prison, he was diagnosed with antisocial behaviors and paranoid schizophrenia, although there was doubt as to the latter diagnosis. These disorders may have caused Aldwin to be out of touch with reality, casting doubt as to whether he was actually aware of his actions and their moral value. Although, it would take a psychiatrist to determine the extent of this incoherence. However, whether he was guilty or not, Aldwin’s punishment will serve as a warning to others involved in similar crime. According to the soft compatibilist view punishment for moral wrongs can serve to deter others from crime. In essence, punishment will serve as a determining cause for someone else’s reform.
Two people with two completely different characteristics have something alike. Both Dally and Johnny are mentally tough because of their parents. Johnny and Dally’s parents both do not care for them and could care less about them. For example, during Dally’s childhood he went to jail, been in a gang, and has been in many fights and his dad still would not care for him even if he won the lottery. Dally also talks about his dad's disgrace towards him in the car with Johnny and Ponyboy, “‘ Shoot, my dad don’t give a hang whether I’m in jail or dead in a car wreck or drunk in a gutter...’”(88). Dally could easily live without his dad and he does for the most part. Dally just hangs around with his friends and stays at their place. Similarly, Johnny's parents use him like a rag doll to blow off steam, “his father always beating him up”(14). The gang knows what happenes in Johnny’s house. Once Ponyboy was witnessing, “Johnny take a whipping with a two-by-four from his old man”(33). Ponyboy talks about how loud and mean Johnny's mom is and,“you can...
...d few such as Anna, Stella, and Alice who broke free of the poison, lived their lives as Sam Toms’ did who rooted the family. They as he did lied, cheated, manipuled, and kept secrets to try to live a happy life which in actuality their lives were anything but.
...uding the plot, settings, and characters, helped form the good versus evil theme that was evident in the novel. Several good and evil plot events were in the book. The abduction of Michael and Missy was an evil event and the finding of Missy’s mitten and the climax were good events. The novel was also comprised of good and evil settings. The blizzard and Courtney’s large house supported the evil part of the novel. The proximity of Nancy and Courtney’s houses was a good part of the setting. Additionally, the characters played a role in the formation of the theme. Nancy and Ray were good characters as they put their lives at risk for their children. Carl was an evil character because he killed Nancy’s mother as well as his and Nancy’s children. These three elements present in the book helped develop the good vs. evil theme that the novel was primarily based on.
Its America’s pastime. Since 1869, the MLB has been the sweetheart of American sports. A requisite to be a true American is to have a conceptual understanding of baseball; the seventh inning stretch, “Take Me Out To The Ball Game,” as well as hotdogs and warm summer nights at the ball park are all favorite memories of American pastime. However, what one might not realize is the extreme physics behind the game. The velocity of the pitch, and degree of the ball exiting the bat, the exit speed, and how an outfielder throws are entailed within the physics of baseball. It is important to understand the physics involved with baseball to grow in understanding and appreciation of the sport.
,because offenders has a choice to do right or wrong and the rational choice that a person decides to
The path of Wes, the felon, was a life filled with drugs, anger, and reckless choices. His mother and brother were the major
The most prominent household that sustained this abusive cycle was the second generation of Trasks—the family that was the primary focus of the novel—where discrimination towards the disfavored child Cal was what urged him to adapt, and take on a callused-like maturity. Cal was illustrated as dark in many aspects;
...l unloved at times. His parent's when he was eleven only seemed to aggravate the problem. Discipline was inconsistent, and often he was able to get around punishment by wearing down his mother, who could be easily persuaded to give in to what he wanted. Family finances were strained. Although Charlie went to school in an upper middle-class neighborhood, his family could not afford to buy him as much as many of his friends’ parents. He began to run around with kids who were associated with a local gang and was rejected by other friends because of his behavior.
Personally, I believe that the author makes a good case. Depending on some social cues, people's behavior can be quite predictable from selfless to selfish. Most of our legal system leans more on the power of greed and selfishness to mold human behavior when in reality it might do better if the system focused more on conscience. The Jekyll/Hyde syndrome supports my argument, on page 209 of the book it states “there is no difference between the motives and attitudes of criminals, and the motives and attitudes of law-abiding citizens”. Human are expected to follow the rules and act civil even if our self interest tempts us otherwise and if they do not then there is an underlying issue that should be investigated further. Either way, human will
This is relevant as there are utilitarians that rebutted this objection by defining punishment as an infliction of evil on an offender (Primoratz 51). In situations where there is a deliberate decision to “punish” somebody known by the judge to be innocent--that is to an inflict an evil on somebody that, if he were guilty, would be considered punishment, the utilitarian has sufficient grounds to deny this is punishment because the man is not an offender and therefore say this scenario as a consequence of the utilitarian view of punishment (52). Primoratz views this as “poor consolation” as while it might not strictly be a consequence of a utilitarian view of punishment, it is an implication of the ethical consequences of utilitarianism in general, meaning the argument still strikes at fundamental base of utilitarianism, which truly determines whether the doctrine should be taken seriously
whether the punishment fits the crime and if it honors the nature of the moral
The moral neutralisation theory was originally developed by Dr Gresham Sykes and his student Dr David matza in 1957 as an expansion of Sutherland’s theory regarding differential association theory in 1947. The idea behind the theory of neutralisation by matza and Sykes was to explain and create a wider understanding of juvenile delinquency. The theory of Moral neutralisation was studied to illustrate neutralisation techniques used by individuals who refuse to conform to social order and chose to participate in crimes, to neutralise the guilt of their acts. Offenders generally tend to neutralise certain values within themselves. This is done so that not abiding the law does not affect their inner self negatively, in order to preserve the good
While roaming the hills around an isolated home, a young boy named Henry, displayed rather unusual characteristics associated with his behaviors. What seemed like a cute and innocent boy was nothing but a face of hidden evil. Henry was a very free-spirited and often wild 12 year old boy who enjoyed engaging in daring activities while experiencing adrenaline rushes. His behaviors and curiosities seemed to be limitless, to the point where it brought forth a bit of suspicion. At this age, these types of behaviors may seem “normal” for a young boy like Henry; behaviors that display some hyperactivity, and self-exploration. However, Henry’s attitude and behaviors took a quick turn as his real intentions and motives became ever so clear. Henry is a young boy who grew up in a rather large home, set on top of a hill, overlooking the ocean in the state of Maine. He comes from two loving parents, a mother and father, and has a younger sister who looks up to him. He also had a younger brother named Richard, who died a while back from “accidently” drowning in the bathtub. Despite the tragic loss, he seemed to have a stable family lifestyle.
Al Borlan, ( Richard Karn ) is Tim’s best friend, and also his co-worker on the television show “Tool Time.”
The loss of societal values and rules throughout the novel often marks the boys’ gradual descent into savagery and thus, their loss of innocence. In the beginning of the novel, the boys simply play and do as they wish without any parental control; however, they remain tame and overall nonviolent, as those restrictions imposed by