Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Concepts of conflict management and strategies
Team and group conflict resolution strategies
Concepts of conflict management and strategies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Identify and discuss four barriers to effective teamwork in the case study.
The four main barriers are poor communication, an unclear common objective, conflicting attitudes, priorities and values, and the lack of equal responsibility amongst the team.
Firstly, the team’s poor communication. Despite Brandon being self-oriented and disruptive by not showing up for meetings and shirking his responsibilities, the team fails to confront him regarding his commitment and his duties, probably due to groupthink, they deem that Brandon would not be up to negotiate. Instead, Suhaimi takes on Brandon’s work, as he does for any other teammates’ shortcomings, without compromising. Also, Miko being silent and withdrawn during meetings might lead to misunderstandings between her and her teammates, such as Suhaimi seemingly not trusting her. Furthermore, the team’s poor communication led to differing project focuses. Overall, having poor communication would lead to misunderstandings and hinders effective teamwork.
Secondly, an unclear common objective. Two out
…show more content…
Conflicting attitudes and priorities are instances like Brandon’s lack of contribution, Ming Liang doing minimal work, Bee Lay being unable to keep up with the others due to her extensive commitments out of class, Suhaimi being overzealous with the project, and putting it upon himself to take on others’ work or flaws in their work. This might lead to problems such as Brandon and Ming Liang not giving their full efforts, thinking Suhaimi would pick up the slack, or Bee Lay failing to keep up with the project progress in the long run. Whereas differing values explains why Miko is withdrawn. Due to her culture being a high-context one, she does not wish to create a fuss with her replies and hence chooses to compromise her perspective on the situation. However, others might find Miko’s behaviour uncooperative, making it harder to work with
What are some common threats to each of the essential conditions for successful team performance? What are the psychological factors underpinning these threats?
1. How might different aspects of teams and teamwork contribute to team members thinking about quitting their jobs?
Creating and managing effective teams in today’s work environment is much different than it was just a short time ago. With each generation of American workers come new ideas, rules, and methodologies that must be considered when developing an effective team. Some of the newer ideas may have been foreign to managers even ten years ago. An example of this is that many companies today are becoming more socially responsible. A recent article in Incentive states, “Social responsibility, it seems, is the new signing bonus” (Flanagan, p4, 2006). Rarely are managers given a perfect set of employees, a perfect environment, or a team without conflict in order to develop an effective team. These issues make it more important than ever to be able to effectively manage these teams. The simulation for Luxurion was an excellent example of managing a team well, even when the team is not put together perfectly. This paper will examine what team member were chosen, why these choices were made, issues that were worked through during the simulation and the final outcome after completing the simulation.
issues separating each party. This is also one of the important aspects of effective communication
Team member will sometime become defensiveness, guilt, project, misreading of body language, tone and other nonverbal communication. Power struggles in the team (two chief) not enough Indians. Some team member could bias which include stereotyping. Stereotyping is the most common. Experience of individual members on the team can effect communication. Cultural different can effect team communication.
This case study involves an interactive team working for Advert marketing firm on a new ad campaign for one of the firm’s most important clients. The team of Evan, Conner, Alexis, Derek and Judy was picked by upper management based on their similar talents, personalities, and biographical features such as age and tenure at Advert. This group was tasked with creating an innovative ad campaign to promote a 60-inch plasma television. Due to Advert’s confidence in the team, they were given complete autonomy throughout the entire process of creating the campaign. During the initial discussion, the team selected an idea for the commercial and ran with it. Upon presenting the final product to their managers and the client, the ad was met with disapproval, ending the working relationship between Advert and the client.
Although there is a plethora of possible sources of conflict in any workplace, the ones in this case are rather explicit. These include personal differences, Informal deficiencies’, role incompatibility, environment stress, perceptions, and expectations. Personal differences could be related to personal values, physiognomies, family bonds or ties, and material belongings.
A group can only be called a team if the members are actively working together toward a common goal. A team must have the capability to set goals, make decisions, solve problems, and share responsibilities. For a team to be successful, trust must be earned between its members by being consistent and reliable (Temme & Katzel, 2005). When more than one person is working on a particular task, inconsistent views or opinions commonly arise. People come from different backgrounds and live through different life experiences therefore, even when working towards a common goal, they will not always see eye to eye. Major conflict that is not dealt with can devastate a team or organization (Make Conflict Work, 2008). In some situations, conflict can be more constructive than destructive. Recognizing the difference between conflict that is constructive to the team and conflict that is destructive to the team is important. Trying to prevent the conflict is not always the best way to manage conflict when working within a team setting. Understanding conflict, what causes it, and how to resolve conflict effectively, should consume full concentration.
There is no team that can progress when a common goal is not defined. This is obvious, but many teams fail to correctly define their goals and create a personal interpretation of each member. Another important point for success is cohesion in the work team, more cohesive groups maintain the team spirit that increases the motivation and the will to strive for quality and this increases when there is an affinity between the participants where everyone is well. Communication is precisely what connects people to reach the common goal, observing and understanding processes are a crucial part of a good job, some aspects of communication can bring problems and often cause project failures. Communication involves not only words
One of the major sources of the conflicts, regarding to the given case, is incompatible goals: “the new executives clashed with the current executives regarding business strategy” another evidence for that is that the CEO says they 'ended up with an old team and a new team and they weren't on the same wavelength'.
Intercultural barriers include ethnocentrism, stereotypes, interpretation of time or chronemics, personal space requirements or proxemics, body language or kinesics, and translation limitations. Approaches for overcoming these obstacles include learn about the other
...rs but the goal is not achieved until each member has completed his part. The Factors that influence teamwork are impacted trust and have an impact on trust. When communication breaks down, trust is reduced and communications can help to build trust (Rocco, Hofer, and Herbsleb).Research shows that conflict has a negative impact on performance. A conceptual model is developed which explores relationship between conflict and performance and conflict impact performance through its effect on exchange and trust (Lau & Cobb, 2009).
In order for a work place to be successful and beneficial to everyone involve in the company, teams needs to be form, and each team must have a goal in mind. Employees must come together to accomplish a common goal. Teamwork will not only benefit those involve in the project but it will also have a huge impact in your business.
...g effectively. personality conflicts, poor management, and resistance to change or a lack of motivation are attitudinal barriers to communication.
In today’s workplace teamwork is an essential part of success. We have more and more business that are incorporating teamwork in some type of way. They are effectively implementing ways on how to create effective teams, teamwork and team building. They are also creating a work culture that values collaboration. Teamwork, is about people working together and working towards reaching their common goal.