Ban Of Wikipedia Essay

656 Words2 Pages

Wikipedia is a frequent resource used by students who would much rather click on the first result given by a search engine such as google, than dwell on multiple books for hours. The main idea behind Wikipedia is to be a “free encyclopedia, written collaboratively by the people who use it”, where volunteers constantly create impressive articles in countless topics. Although this is an idea was have learned to rely on; the open-editing policy they assess, where writers regardless of their background or experience can write or edit any topic of their choice is problematic. On a scholarly paper, students should avoid Wikipedia as their only source of information. However, if used, it should be used and analyzed with caution. On the other hand, as an education resource, Wikipedia is a great platform for students or anyone to briefly learn about a topic, either by writing or reading about it. …show more content…

As it prohibits students from using papers found on this common resource that this website has become. It is understandable that Students read Wikipedia, as it has proved to be useful and accurate most of the time. This is thanks to the great number of knowledgeable individuals who volunteered their time and knowledge in writing articles as a resource for others to follow. Passionate writers and experts collaborate together in order to properly develop each entry in Wikipedia to the best of their abilities. This is what makes the articles “amazingly accurate”. Nevertheless, the open editing policy is a double-edged sword as it allows any users to edit any article to their desire. Therefore, the open editing policy makes Wikipedia prone to errors, especially when compared to other encyclopedias, which are more carefully written and not

More about Ban Of Wikipedia Essay

Open Document