Art And Life By Jane Jacobs Summary

585 Words2 Pages

Jane Jacobs begins chapter nineteen with an in-depth consideration based on the visual order: its limitations and possibilities. When designing cities, it comes with dealing with people’s lives when it is most complex and intense. However, it must be noted that a city cannot be a work of art. They need art, but can’t be viewed as a structural problem and be viewed with visual work based on art. The reason why we need art is to reassure us of our humanity. Art and life are intermixed but are not exactly the same. It should be known that when an artist has a sense of the demands of the work he had made, it controls him. What streets represent are our visual views of cities. There are different kinds of buildings like storefronts and businesses. If they are used strongly, they will need a sort of visual interruptions or they will look like they are endless or unlimited. This can be from the grid-like of the nature of streets in a city. If a city doesn't look like a grid, a lot of people will get lost in the neighborhood. An example of a city that does not have a problem is San Francisco because of its hills and slopes there. Jacobs explains that the confusion between art and life are neither life nor art but are taxidermy. Taxidermy at sometimes can be useful and a decent craft in its place. However, sometimes it …show more content…

Jacobs includes work from nineteenth-century Utopians with their rejection of urbanized society and their inheritance of eighteenth century romanticism. On page 489, Jacobs clarifies that to see complex systems of functional order as order, and not ask chaos, takes understanding. She analyzes the what a citys structure consists of mixture of uses and that the “skeleton” of a city structure are on the fundamentally the wrong track. It must be understood that streets provide the principal visual scenes in

More about Art And Life By Jane Jacobs Summary

Open Document