Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Narrative essay about a trip to cuba
Narrative essay about a trip to cuba
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Narrative essay about a trip to cuba
Imprisonment or Freedom? Worldwide boxing champion Muhammad Ali once said, “he who is not courageous enough to take risks will accomplish nothing in life.” Taking a risk, is giving a situation the benefit of the doubt and hoping for the best when knowing that danger could be a possible outcome. It’s giving a choice complete faith in knowing that something bad may happen. Because risk is dangerous, how does one determine if the risk is worth the reward, and when is the risk worth the consequences? Armando Socarras Ramirez shared his personal story “I Escaped From Cuba in the Wheels of a DC-8” to Denis Fodor and John Reddy. This story was published in Reader’s Digest Magazine. He demonstrates that the risk is worth the consequence when something is …show more content…
For instance, Ramirez stated, “young as I was, I was tired of living in a state that controlled everyone’s life.” (Fodor and Reddy 2). The constant controlling of Ramirez’s life was causing him to be unhappy. He communicates in a way that makes him appear to feel already imprisoned. Furthermore, Ramirez talked about his family and said “We are poor, like most Cubans.” (Fodor and Reddy 2). If money was paid based on hard work ethic, Ramirez’s family would have been rich. Because the government controlled their lives in every aspect, they were not able to live to their fullest capacity. They were a less fortunate family because the government had already established that they were destined to be a less fortunate family. Even though Ramirez encountered many setbacks on his journey, when he made it to New Jersey, he concluded his anecdote with, “you can smell freedom in air.” (Fodor and Reddy 4). In his eyes, dying or being captured was a reasonable consequence in order to achieve freedom. A man that is not free to do what he desires is a man who is unhappy. Even knowing the risks, Ramirez jeopardized his life based on confidence and a pinch of
The short story “Cherokee” written by Ron Rash is about a young married couple fighting to save their truck by gambling their last one hundred and fifty-seven dollars in slot machines at a casino in North Carolina. Rash did an impeccable job at creating two ordinary, everyday people by portraying their lives as the working poor of America. The two characters, Danny and Lisa, both work; however, they are barely making it by and fell behind on their truck payments. Throughout the short story is observed a theme of freedom, or lack thereof, not only through the plot but also through psychology and economics.
In the Working Poor, David Shipler shows the different levels of poverty in the United States. Although many people work every day, they still do not have enough money to live their lives comfortably or contently. In chapter 1, Money and Its Opposite, we discuss the different people that worked hard their entire lives only to remain in or below the poverty line. For instance, in the book Shipler speaks of the disadvantages that the working poor are susceptible to. Often being taken advantage of by employers that do not give access that they are entitled to, the working poor are more likely to be audited than the wealthy, and become victims of cons that point toward money for a small payment, first.
In this story, the reader can see exactly how, many Puerto Ricans feel when living on other grounds. Throughout this time, the boy that Rodriguez presents us realizes he has his culture and that he wants to preserve it as much as he can. “Because I’m Puerto Rican”. I ain’t no American. And I’m not a Yankee flag-waver”
Despite this, the authors parents created a comfortable haven for him and his siblings in their adopted country. The author shares with the reader how close and tightly-knit his family was. He describes in numerous instances the "special feeling of closeness" that he shared with his family. He also mentions the fact that he used to feel a "desperate, urgent, intense" feeling of wanting to be home. Spending time at home, speaking his "personal" language of Spanish, and being with his family gave Rodriguez comfort and a feeling of safety that was not felt outside of his home.
During the course of America's lifetime, million upon millions of people left their homes and families in other countries and traveled to America in the hope of securing a better life -- the American Dream. What they often found was an unwillingness on the part of those already established in America to share society's benefits with them. For many segments of our American society, people substituted a reliance on family, or friends, or even faith alone, to secure these benefits for themselves and their children that was denied them by those possessing economic and political power.
Everyone wanted the American Dream; people came from all over to accomplish the dream of equal opportunity and a better life. It was thought to be easy to move up the ladder in the working society, that a non-owner could eventually be an owner with the right amount of work and dedication.1 There were two different sides on viewing the American Dream and the work place. The Consensus paradigm and the Conflict paradigm are entirely different with their views, especially with how the people were being treated in this time period.
The American Dream provides Americans hope that if they work hard, they will eventually be successful, no matter how penniless the person. To understand the construction of this topic, there is a need to understand the circumstances involved. The Epic of America, The narrative in which the American Dream was constructed, was produced in the nineteen thirties. During this time, the Great Depression was at the height of destruction, and the new president Franklin D. Roosevelt created the “New Deal,” which inspired newly-found hope. In his Second Inaugural Address, he voiced his vision for the expanded role that the government would take in American's lives by stating, “The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little” (Franklin D. Roosevelt). This began the facade of hope towards the impoverished folks attempting to achieve success. In reality the optimism and dedication given towards this dream is disproportional...
As Americans we are raised to believe that every individual has a chance to succeed; that is to succeed financially and economically, but not an equal chance. Ultimately, at...
But after he joined the censors, he got so devoted to the job that in the end, he censored his own letter without thinking and got himself executed the next day (Valenzuela 92). In this short story, we learn that people tend to forget their initial goal after putting all their efforts into something. Juan got so into his job that he forgot what he was trying to do in the first place, thus getting himself executed. This supports my argument because if you devoted all of your time to fighting and demanding for freedom, you might in the end forget what you are fighting for and never get what you want.
One’s beliefs are a powerful, while they can achieve some things, they can also get one killed. Juan Martinez’s beliefs are what drive him to do what he does throughout the story. These actions define him as both a hero and a fool. Though they do not prevail and do not achieve what he hoped for, he makes a valiant effort to do so. This effort can make him seem as a fool. He stands up to a government and to the law that controls the country and does not back down to citizens that demand change. His sacrifice of his family and himself is an action that can go both ways, it can fuel change in his country or leaves his death in
A large part of this problem is that many Americans buy into the ploys of capitalism, sacrificing happiness for material gain. “Americans have voluntarily created, and voluntarily maintained, a society which increasingly frustrates and aggravates” them (8). Society’s uncontrolled development results in an artificial sense of scarcity which ensures “a steady flow of output” (78).
When we think about society, there is often a stark contrast between the controversy projected in the media that our society faces, and the mellow, safe view we have of our own smaller, more tangible, ‘local’ society. This leads us to believe that our way of life is protected, and our rights secured by that concept of society that has been fabricated and built upon. However, what if society were not what we perceive it to be, and the government chose to exercise its power in an oppressive manner? As a society we would like to think that we are above such cruelty, yet as The Lonely Crossing of Juan Cabrera by J. Joaquin Fraxedas recounts the state of Cuba in the 1990’s, we must also remember that all societies and governments view the individual differently as opposed to the whole. Each group has unique expectations that are enforced upon the individual which extend beyond those expectations that are written. What this book brings to light is the extraordinary repercussions of refusing to meet the demands and expectations of those that lead our governments. When we veer from the path well-trodden and into the ‘wild’ as Juan did, we may not face death quite as often, but the possibility of those we once called our own, persecuting us for our choices is a true and often an incredibly frightening danger.
One would expect that social equality would just be the norm in society today. Unfortunately, that is not the case. Three similar stories of how inequality and the hard reality of how America’s society and workforce is ran shows a bigger picture of the problems American’s have trying to make an honest living in today’s world. When someone thinks about the American dream, is this the way they pictured it? Is this what was envisioned for American’s when thinking about what the future held? The three authors in these articles don’t believe so, and they are pretty sure American’s didn’t either. Bob Herbert in his article “Hiding from Reality” probably makes the most honest and correct statement, “We’re in denial about the extent of the rot in the system, and the effort that would be required to turn things around” (564).
In Junot Diaz’s essay “The Money” he explains where his family stands economically. Stating that his father was regularly being fired from his forklifting jobs and his mother 's only job was to care for him and his four siblings. With the money brought home by his father, his mom would save some. Her reason was to raise enough to send to her parents back in the Dominican Republic. When his family went on a vacation, they came back to an unpleasant surprise; their house had been broke into. Eventually Diaz was able to get back their money and belongings. Diaz returned the money to his mother although she didn’t thank him for it, this disappointed him. Like Diaz I have also encountered a similar situation where I was disappointed. When I was in second grade, my life life took a completely different turn. My dad took an unexpected trip to Guatemala, on his return, the outcome was not what I expected.
The “American Dream” consists of all U.S citizens having the opportunity to obtain success and prosperity through hard work and determination, but, in a capitalistic economy such as the United States the “American Dream” is merely impossible. Low wages are masked as starting points, taught to eventually pay off in the form of small raises or promotions. Competition to obtain unequally shared resources, is used to define an individual’s extent of initiative. In reality, these are all concepts used by the wealthy to deter the poor working class from obtaining upward mobility. Middle class America, the key factor in helping the wealthy stay wealthy, have adapted to these beliefs and concepts, created to keep them far behind. Conflict theorist