Aristotle And George Booleon: A Concise Introduction To Logic

757 Words2 Pages

The study of philosophy has become a lost art. Philosophy does not receive credit for the achievements received, when all work stems from philosophy. One important branch of philosophy is logic. Through logic, the world can see how questions are developed, why questions are asked, and how questions are invalid. Many logicians have been formulating hypothesis centering around logic for years. Aristotle and George Boole are two logicians who are extremely well known for their work in the philosophical field and their conflicting viewpoints when considering logic. In the textbook, A Concise Introduction to Logic by Patrick J. Hurley, tenth edition, 2008 Wadsworth, Cengage Learning used in Introduction to Logic at Mississippi State University, Hurley takes two approaches to logic: Aristotelian (traditional) and Boolean (modern) logic, and how all logic connects to these ideas. (Dumitriu) Aristotle and Boole differ specifically in their options of universal propositions. Universal statements are simply propositions which …show more content…

He then used the diagrams to explain his lack of an essential import claim, yet he owes his organizational strategy to John Venn. Boole’s theories do not depend on Venn’s work, yet the work on Venn significantly helped Boole’s career through configuration. Venn, the inventor of diagrams, originated in England studying logic. He is known for his logic of chance with relative frequency about his legendary diagrams. Venn’s diagrams are known for representing categorical propositions and testing the validity of categorical syllogisms, and for depicting relations between sets. Two-circle Venn diagrams depict the categorical propositions, which are: “All A are B,” “No A are B,” “Some A are B,” and “Some A are not B.” Three-circle diagrams depict syllogisms, a deductive argument form. Venn’s ideas regarding logic of chance are still in practice today.

Open Document