Arguments Against Merit Pay

1112 Words3 Pages

Merit Pay is a label that is used to describe the performance related pay for educators. Merit pay was designed to be an incentive for teachers to be able to utilize performance pay depending on the performance of their students. The foundation of merit pay relies on solely on the incentive strategies. The strategy is founded on the principle that people will respond with the correct response due to higher incentives. On March 24, 2011, it was implemented with teachers and their pay. Governor Rick Scott signed and approved, the Florida legislation. The Senate Bill 736 was created and set to be implemented. The legislation required that every school district in the state of Florida now abide to these laws by June 1, 2014. The districts were …show more content…

Through the research and deliberation I slowly am able to view both sides of the spectrum. For one teacher, I could clearly view how it would not be beneficial. For the second teacher, I can also see how it would be more than beneficial. Depending on the teachers perspective, experience and results is what will equal the negative or positive response towards the opinion of merit pay. As a teacher to be, the thought of merit pay seems unfair however, it is somewhat fair because it is based on the teachers willingness to preform well with her students. This being said, conducting by research it was amusing to discover that teachers from my generation were more likely to be satisfied with merit pay versus a teacher who has been teaching many years in the public school system. “Researchers regularly report that today's early career teachers are more interested in pay for performance than their veteran colleagues are (Public Agenda, 2009). They seek to combine classroom teaching with other roles — for example, as an instructional coach or data analyst. Currently, many districts are experimenting with bonuses for teachers whose students score well on standardized tests. But this additional pay is almost always tacked on to the traditional single-salary scale” (Johnson, Moore & Papay, 2010). Robert Vagi who is a professor and analyzer at the University of Arizona states that: “According to Springer (2009), two recent studies have assessed the effectiveness of value-added merit pay on student achievement in schools in New York and Nashville. Though proponents of merit pay hoped that the New York and Nashville initiatives might serve as models for future reform, neither resulted in higher test scores or increased teacher motivation. Pointing out shortcomings in the systems implementation, the authors of both studies expressed hope for the future

Open Document