Arguments Against Insanity Defense

1393 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: General element of criminal liability

One of the most talked about and controversial defenses is the insanity defense. Case after case it seems to spark a lot of debate about whether it should be admissible or not. It is also one of the most rarely used, and rarely successful defenses. The insanity defense is a not guilty plea due to them lacking the mental capacity to realize that the crime they committed was wrong, or understand why it was wrong (Martin, 1998). This focuses on the mens rea of a crime, if they are able to differentiate between right and wrong, and looking less at the actus reus of a crime. Essentially it is a strategy to excuse a criminal from being punished for committing a crime, and avoid criminal liability through the insanity defense. Instead placing
These cases typically have bizarre things happening in them as well, that make them so fascinating to the public. There are many controversies surrounding the defense, some people argue it is misused, that people may fake insanity to get an acquittal or less severe conviction (Martin, 1998). However, in a 1979 sample of 1000 felony cases, less than five pleaded insanity, and no more than one was successful; the study found that the public overestimated the use of the insanity defense by 98% (Dafary-Kapur, 2010). The study also found that the public believes 25.6% of insanity acquittees are released right away without any conditions, or court mandated requirements. Realistically the number of insanity defendants that are released unconditionally is 1% (Dafary-Kapur, 2010). There are a lot of misconceptions about sentencing of those who plea insanity, or the punishment those people receive. This stems from the media and false information about cases where the insanity defense is used, or the lack of knowledge people have regarding mental illness. Since the vast majority of these cases host episodes of strange erratic behaviour people tend to think anyone who pleas insanity has more than just a mental illness. Typically, these people have to undergo psychiatric evaluations to see what is
Throughout the Andrea Yates case it is clear to see how confusing the not guilty by reason of insanity plea really is. There is no clear cut answers, and the courts have to review the case each year. After her sentencing to life in prison was reversed, the case looked more into what caused her to commit such crimes, and why someone would do such a thing. Her second sentencing focused on the mens rea, looking at what was happening in her mind before and during the crimes. Andrea had issues dating far before the date of the murders, and while these had previously been assessed no one could fully understand what was going on in her mind. Her sentencing the second time was to not be in prison at all, instead placing her in a mental institution where she could get the help she needed, and be supervised continuously. The problems with this case lay within the first trial. It focused too much on the thought that her murders were based off a tv show, and not enough on it being her own idea as a result of being mentally unstable. Pleading insanity is very rare as well there are not a lot of similar cases or verdicts that the court could have based her conviction off of. If they would have had different tests for mental disorders back in 2001 like we do now perhaps she could have been diagnosed better, and the crimes could have been avoided. Some

Show More
Related

  • Who Is Bruco Eastwood Undercover Insanity Plea?

    1230 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many criminals find many ways to get out of jail or being sentenced to death, what goes through their minds? Pleading insanity means to not be guilty of a crime committed due to reason of mental illness. In many cases criminals get away with pleading insanity, but in the end does it always work out? Bruco Eastwood pleaded insanity and therefore his background, crime, and where he is now will be crucial to Brucos’ insanity plea.

    Read More

  • Andrea Yates

    967 Words  | 2 Pages

    The punishment in the State of Texas for committing two capital crimes is life in jail or the death penalty. Andrea’s lawyer tried to show her innocence by protesting that she was insane at the time of the killings. This plea of insanity could have kept her from life in jail or the death penalty. Sure, she would have served a couple years in jail, but she would have been given the opportunity to come out on parole. Now, if this lady was insane like some believe, then how could she know she committed a crime and not know she was doing wrong when actually drowning the children? Mrs. Yates knew exactly that she hurt the innocent children and was awfully aware of what was going on. Mrs. Yates even called the police and her husband to inform them of what she had done. If the death penalty was on her mind while she was drowning the children, then she might have shown some moral awareness before drowning them instead of after they had died. I believe Andrea to be a sane woman, even though she was depressed or had postpartum depression.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Jeffrey Dahmer's Plea Of Insanity

    3860 Words  | 8 Pages

    With murder charges of fifteen people, cannibalism, and necrophilia hanging over his head, Jeffery Dahmer plead not guilty by reason of insanity. Since Dahmer was a child he had shown withdraws and avoidance of society. He had a habit of collecting dead animals, and he would dissect, dissolve them in many different ways. When Dahmers plea of insanity was rejected by the court, he was then charged with fifteen counts of murder (Yoong). Many believe that when Jeffrey Dahmer 's plea was rejected that it was the end of anyone using, but that isn’t the case. It is used quite rarely, but it is still in use. In all reality, the insanity plea should always be rejected. The only way it should be allowed is if the criminal is fully innocent. “The insanity

    Read More

  • Insanity in Tell Tale Heart by Edgar Alan Poe

    1048 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... others that as soon as they claim they hear voices or are claim they killed someone because they did not like the way a person’s eye looked that they can get off on a lighter sentence. The defendant has planned all of this out, and if it works out the way he has planned it, there will be a murderer released from a mental institution after a short period of time instead of being locked up for the rest of his life with the other criminals like he deserves. If this person were insane, he would have not have mentioned anything about the old man’s fortune if it were so unimportant that he would have never mentioned it at all. The States believes that the defense has failed to prove it burden of 51% and this man must be convicted and sent to a prison before he murders someone else and uses “insanity” as an excuse again.

    Read More

  • Reframing Insanity: Beyond Mental Illness

    861 Words  | 2 Pages

    How is that even possible? The dictionary definition of the word insanity is the state of being seriously, mentally ill (“Definition of the Word Insanity”). Insanity is also classified as a medical diagnosis. Insanity came from the Latin word insanitatem (“History of the Word Insanity”). People started using this word in the 1580’s. The Latins interpreted insanity as unhealthy Modern day society uses the word insanity too loosely. Although the dictionary definition of insanity is not wrong, several cases that prove having “insanity” does not always mean “being seriously mentally ill” has came to surface.

    Read More

  • Case Study Of Mark J. Dipietley's Case

    1723 Words  | 4 Pages

    What’s more, the success rate of those cases is only about 26%. Insanity defense can be a possible escape to crime, but in order to state as true the defense of insanity or the insanity plea, the person who is being sued or was sued must declare that he/she is not responsible for his/her actions because of their mental health problem. That person must strongly express that he/she was not aware of the actions. Usually, the first thing that is done in a person’s insanity plea is that he /she needs to go through a thorough mental process. Psychologists or Psychiatrists can help the process on how to figure out the person’s actual state of mind during the crime. However, they are not in the position to decide whether the person is really insane. Only the jury can decide whether the statements in court or the findings support the criminal insanity defense. If the court finds the person is guilty for the possible crime but she or she was not mentally responsible during the time that the crime was committed, often, they will be sent to a psychiatric hospital or placed in a mental hospital for the criminally insane. Usually, punishment is not forever; it will only last until the person is no longer a threat to the people of the world. There are cases where they claim insanity only lasts a certain period of time. This kind of defense is very hard to prove. If the person declares that their

    Read More

  • The Insanity Defense

    1267 Words  | 3 Pages

    Much of my skepticism over the insanity defense is how this act of crime has been shifted from a medical condition to coming under legal governance. The word "insane" is now a legal term. A nuerological illness described by doctors and psychiatrists to a jury may explain a person's reason and behavior. It however seldom excuses it. The most widely known rule in...

    Read More

  • Casey Anthony

    757 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...county has presented was the odor of the car smelling like decomposing human body. The media to me made the case seem more one sided that she was guilty right off the bat the prosecutors must of have the same feeling that will lead up to little evidence they will provide in the court room. In my opinion I do think Casey Anthony is guilty on count of murder she was lien to everyone about everything, steal money from friends and family, and still trying to go out partying when she should have been caring for her daughter. There is not one parent that will go thirty plus days without knowing where their only child is. Even though she lied to law enforcement about her daughter where beings have been for the pass month, it was not enough evidence to convict her of murder in the first degree the charges that the county was actually trying to charge against Casey Anthony.

    Read More

  • The Insanity Defense

    2529 Words  | 6 Pages

    When someone commits a crime, he or she may use mental illness as a defense. This is called an insanity plea or insanity defense. What the insanity defense does is try to give the alleged perpetrator a fair trial. At least in extreme cases, society agrees with this principle. The problem is where do we draw the line. Under what circumstances is a person considered insane, and when are they not? The trouble with the insanity defense in recent years is the assumption that virtually all criminals have some sort of mental problem. One important point is that the crime itself, no matter how appalling, does not demonstrate insanity. Today, the insanity defense has become a major issue within the legal system. If the defendant is clearly out of touch with reality, the police and district attorney ordinarily agree to bypass the trial and let the defendant enter a mental hospital.

    Read More

  • The Insanity Defense

    1333 Words  | 3 Pages

    The insanity defense pertains that the issue of the concept of insanity which defines the extent to which a person accused of crimes may be alleviated of criminal responsibility by reason of mental disease. “The term insanity routinely attracts widespread public attention that is far out of proportion to the defense’s impact on criminal justice” (Butler,133). The decision of this defense is solely determined by the trial judge and the jury. They determine if a criminal suffers from a mental illness. The final determination of a mental disease is solely on the jury who uses evidence and information drawn from an expert witness. The result of such a determination places the individual accused, either in a mental facility, incarcerated or released from all charges. Due to the aforementioned factors, there are many problems raised by the insanity defense. Some problems would be the actual possibility of determining mental illness, justify the placement of the judged “mentally ill” offenders and the total usefulness of such a defense. In all it is believed that the insanity defense should be an invalid defense and that it is useless and should potentially be completely abolished.

    Read More

  • Analysis of the Case of Andrea Yates

    875 Words  | 2 Pages

    When viewed from a strictly medical, psychological aspect, Andrea Yates medical history indicates that after the birth of her first child, she began to suffer from various forms of depression and suicide attempts. If one only examines the paper trail and doesn’t think beyond what the medical history does or does not indicate, then perhaps, Andrea would be innocent by reason of mental insanity as the 2006 acquittal suggest. However, when viewed form a legal aspect there are several inconstancies that challenge if this former nurse was insane or if she in fact premeditated the murder of her children as well as her acquittal.

    Read More

  • Essay On Automatism

    1726 Words  | 4 Pages

    Insane automatism alternatively referred to as the defence of insanity dates back from 1843 to what is known as the ‘M'Naughten Rules’ which govern the defence. Under this rule, the defendant at the time of the offence suffers a defect of reason caused by a disease of mind and didn't know that the nature of the act was legally wrong. The test for this defence is legal and not medically recognised as in Sullivan . A successful plea of this type of automatism is a special verdict of "not guilty by reason of insanity" leaving the court authority to detain and give suspension order in a hospital for public protection and the burden of proof rest upon the defendant. While, non-insane automatism sometimes referred to automatism is a defence applicable to all offence and has to do with total loss of voluntary control. The loss of control must not be self-induced when claiming the ...

    Read More

  • Automatism, Insanity and Diminished Responsibility

    1568 Words  | 4 Pages

    A defence in criminal law arises when conditions exist to negate specific elements of the crime: the actus reus when actions are involuntary, the mens rea when the defendant is unaware of the significance of their conduct, or both. These defences will mitigate or eliminate liability for a criminal offence. Insanity, automatism and diminished responsibility are examples of such defenses. They each share characteristics but can be distinguished in their scope and application. Insanity, automatism and diminished responsibility all play a significant role in cases where the defendant’s mind is abnormal while committing a crime.

    Read More

  • Comparing and Contrasting the Differences of Insanity, Automatism and Diminished Responsibility

    1543 Words  | 4 Pages

    There are two theories that justify punishment: retributivism according to which punishment ensures that justice is done, and utilitarianism which justifies punishment because it prevents further harm being done. The essence of defences is that those who do not freely choose to commit an offence should not be punished, especially in those cases where the defendant's actions are involuntary. All three of these defences concern mental abnormalities. Diminished responsibility is a partial statutory defence and a partial excuse. Insanity and automatism are excuses and defences of failure of proof. While automatism and diminished responsibility can only be raised by the defendant, insanity can be raised by the defence or the prosecution. It can be raised by the prosecution when the defendant pleads diminished responsibility or automatism. The defendant may also appeal against the insanity verdict. With insanity and diminished responsibility, the burden of proof is on the defendant. With automatism the burden of proof is on the prosecution and they must negate an automatism claim beyond reasonable doubt.

    Read More

More about Arguments Against Insanity Defense

Open Document