More handpicked essays just for you.
Animal testing on cosmetics essay
Why animal testing is necessary in cosmetics
Negative effects of animal testing on animals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Animal testing on cosmetics essay
The topic I chose to do my research is on is it necessary to test medicines on animals in The US? It is really important to know about animal testing how it done and animal testing is affecting our economy and also as well as the population of the animals. The issue with animal testing is that all the cosmetic products we test on animals it does not work as same as on humans because humans are really different than animals and they don’t react as same as animals do. As we all know animals do not develop the same diseases as humans do like human’s gets different types of diseases such as various types of heart diseases, cancer and HIV while reading article “Arguments against Animal Testing” talked about how researchers put the duplicate symptoms so they can see the reactions of experiments they came up with. But as we learned in biology these diseases are caused by genetics and many other personal experiences. Animal testing is not reliable according to “Cruelty free International” 95% of drugs fail in human trail because of various reasons such as safety reasons and maybe because they do not work. Researchers use dogs, cats and many other animals for testing but that does not provide any evidence that drug will be safe for human use. In article “Arguments against Animal Testing” states that a recent study found using mice and …show more content…
Food and Drug Administration. And many of those medicines are for rare diseases. According to Cruelty Free International the US drug industry invests around $50 billion per year in research, but still to this day the approval rate of new drugs is same as it was 50 years ago. So, looking at those numbers we don’t have advancements in medicine field. Even though the results as same as 50 years but the number of animals used in experiments has been doubled in this
The European Union (composed of 28 European countries) and India have both banned animal testing in their countries. The European Union has stated that animal testing is unnecessary which is proven by the Food and Drug Administration proved that 92% of all products that reacted positively in animals were harmful or ineffective in humans as we are two completely different species! Albeit, keep in mind that this 92% is a part of the rare drugs that are found to be effective or even safe for animals. In addition, many people may be concerned that we may have to test out new products on humans instead of animals. The thing is that we already do. For the reason that animal testing is so unreliable, someone will have to, some time or another, be the person to test the specific drug.
Why do we have to use animals for research? Many humans and animals get the same illnesses because animals are biologically similar to humans. Animals have a shorter life cycle than humans and as a result, they can be studied throughout their whole life span or across several generations. According to information from the Office of Technology Assessment, it is estimated that between 17 and 23 million animals are used in research each year. Approximately 95% of these animals are rats and mice specifically bred for research and 4.25% of these animals include rabbits, guinea pigs, sheep, fish, frogs, insects, and other species. Most importantly, only 0.75% of the animals in research are cats, dogs, and primates. Major medical advances have been made because of the research of these animals. (Animal Research 2013)
Every year about 100 million animals suffer through being poisoned, shocked, and burned for unsuccessful medical research. Some may believe that animal testing is a crucial part to medical research and should be used more frequently. Others believe the pain and suffering inflicted upon the animals is morally wrong and should not be done, no matter what benefits come from it.
Animals and humans have different genes meaning that the products being used are going to have different effects on different species (Burrell). After a drug has been tested on a animal, the drug still has to go through a human trial. Which means that the drug they just spent all that time testing on the animal, still needs to be tested on a human to actually make it purchasable. Sadly, “92% of experimental drugs that are safe and effective in animals fail in human clinical trials because they are too dangerous or don’t work” (“11 Facts”). Meaning that most of the drugs used on animals, actually are not benefiting humans. A few of the drugs passed from animals, were detrimental to humans. For example, a arthritis drug tested on mice, seemed to protect their hearts, but when used on humans, it was the cause of heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths (“12 Pros and Cons”). Even when some drugs are passed, they show some side effects that were not shown during the test trial. Animals have been used to help the “war on cancer”, but the tests haven’t transferred from humans to animals. The former head of the National Cancer Institute, Richard Klausner, has stated, “The history of cancer research has been a history of curing cancer in the mouse. We have cured mice of cancer for decades and it simply didn’t work in humans” (“Animal Testing”). Meaning that they have learned the ways of curing mice with
Animals are used as a part of experimentations in order to accomplish new openings. A few individuals think that it is satisfactory, while others contend that it is not moral to sacrifice animals for science. Estimated, that fifty to one hundred million of animals are used for tests in the world. Despite the significance of experiments, the quantity of animals and purpose of research are not under any control. Animals testing should be banned under a few circumstances; we can enhance the situation by using alternative ways such as replacement, reduction, and refinement according to International Society for Applied Ethology.
Animal experiments used in biological research have helped make many advancements in human medicine. Through these experiments when has achieved, a decrease in infant mortality, longer lifespan, and an increase in the quality of life (American Medical Associaton 3). Through indirect of direct experimentation, almost all medical advances can be traced back to research through animals. The control and dismissal of diseases like: small pox, poliomyelitis, and measles has been achieved with animals. Blood transfusions, burn therapy, open brain and hearts surgery where all fulfilled the same way (American Medical Association 54). "Biomedical advances depend on research with animals, and not using them would deprive humans and criminals of the benefits of research" (American Media Association74). Through animal research we could find solutions to AIDS, cancer, heart diseases, aging, and congenital defects. Like Lord Adrian said, “The use of living animals in scientific research can be considered justified if it is likely to produce appreciable benefit to society, if there is no way to conduct the research in quest...
We have all heard statements and read labels saying “against animal testing”, “animal cruelty-free product” and “no animals were harmed in the making of this movie…” Yet still to this day many companies continue to use animals for product and drug testing. Evidently, animal testing is a very controversial issue in the science and animal advocacy communities; as it serves as a safer and cost- efficient way to test new medicines and product lines. However, many will argue it is an unethical and inhumane way to treat animals, as science has made tremendous strides in evolution and can change their methods. With that being said, which argument holds more weight, cost and safety, over animal protection? Neither. The correct answer should be results. Is animal testing giving us the accuracy in results that we need? In my research paper, I will argue that animal testing should not be used for scientific research, as it is an inaccurate method of research in today’s society.
Not only do we have other options for these tests, but animals testing has actually been proven to be ineffective. Companies claim that this sort of cruelty will benefit the human population by testing the “safety” of the products, as they have been for hundreds of years and although this may have been helpful in the past, scientists have discovered otherwise. “While funding for animal experimentation and the number of animals tested on continues to increase, the United States still ranks 49th in the world in life expectancy and second worst in infant mortality in the developed world” (“Animal Testing Is”). This evidence shows that while we still continue to support and spend money on animal testing, it is not working as well as we thought.Essentially we are torturing the animals for a negative outcome, both for the human and the animal. The Food and Drug Administration reports that “92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans” (“Top Five Reasons”). If the products and drugs that we are testing on the animals are not working then there is no use in harming a harmless animal for them. Some may disagree and say that animal testing has enabled us to develop many life saving treatments for both humans and animals. But in reality there has been more cons then pros in animal testing. For example, “Animal tests on the arthritis drug Vioxx showed that it had a protective effect on the hearts of mice, yet the drug went on to cause more than 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths before being pulled from the market” (Should Animals Be). While animal testing has enabled us to create great products it is usually ineffective on humans and leads to animals being harmed for no
Millions of animals are used to test consumer products, but they also become victims to experiments for medical research. In The Ethics of Animal Research (2007) both authors state that there have been many medical advances with the development of medicines and treatments as a result of research conducted on animals (para 1). These medical i...
Penicillin, a vital antibiotic for infection is toxic to ginea pigs. Animal testing isn’t reliable option for human medication or products. Animals have different genetic make up than humans. Mike Leavitt, The Health and Human Service Secretary, states “ Nine out of ten experimental drug fail in clinical studies because we cannot accurately predict how they will behave in people based on laboratory and animal studies.” (Animal Research is Unethical and Scientifically Unnecessary). Humans have obvious differenced than animals like physiology and anatomy. These differences are the reason drug testing on animals isn’t equal when medication or product is used in a human trial. Pfizer reported in 2004 that they “wasted more than $2 billion over the past decade on drugs that “failed in advanced human testing or, in a few instances, were forced off the market, because of liver toxicity problems” (Animal Research is Unethical and Scientifically Unnecessary). Some drugs have caused serious and unexpected health problems even after they were tested on animals. Animal
People do not realize that humans and animals are not very similar. Putting the animals in an environment that is unknown to them causes them to be stressed out which can skew the results of the experiment. The website, Using Animals for Testing: Pros Versus Cons, says that animals and humans are not exactly the same. This website says that that the reaction of drugs in an animal’s body is quite different from the reaction in a humans body. Therefore making these tests unreliable. It also states that the animals are in an unnatural environment which would cause them stress, leading to the drug reacting differently. The website newspaper article Save the Animals: Stop Animal Testing Expresses that the testing of products on animals is completely unnecessary because viable alternatives are available. The say that many cosmetic companies have sought better ways to test their products without the use of animal subjects. It also says that using synthetic material will turn opaque when a product damages it, closely resembling the way that a real eye reacts to harmful substances. Computer simulators also have been in an upright to decrease in the number of animal tests. They are used to estimate how much damage that product would cause human tissue and cells. Another website newspaper article states that all but very few diseases are specific-unique and the only efficient and effective
The people claim that, animal testing infringes animal’s rights, makes animal suffering in the experiments, and some of animal experiments may never be useful to human beings. This is true, but we cannot stop animal testing. According to the article “Facts about Animal Research” by Cook (2006), the smallpox has disappeared from the earth because scientists get vaccines from cows. Also, the scientists got insulin, which is the only drug, which can control diabetes, from dogs and fish. Many medicines are related to medical animal experiments, we cannot give up medical animal experiments.
...inues helping to develop new treatments or knowledge that may guide to the cure of ilnesses. But has certain imitations that have to be clarified, animal research helps scientists to see the expected must not real stages of an illness or drug. By saying expected it is sure to assume that the result obatained from an animal may not be exactly the same that will be obtained from humans due to the many factors that influence this outcome such as genetic, controll of food and liquids, temperature, among others. Technology is now an option to replace some methods used to obtain data from animals, but it is important to highlight that technology may only reduce must not replace the use of animal testing. Animal research is significantly important for the medical field and should be used to benefit us, but alternatives should be used as much as possible if they are available
For many years now, animals have been used for testing and experimentation. Many organizations like PETA and the ARF (Animal Rescue Foundation) strongly oppose the topic of animals being experimented on. Many people are against animal testing as a whole because not only does it harm animals, but many times they may be killed. There have been many countless years and protests against testing, and they deserved to be heard and listened to. People have begun to realize that not only does animal testing harm and kill animals every year; it has been pretty much useless.
For many years there has been controversy whether or not animals should be tested on between scientists and animal right supporters. It is very debatable if animals should be tested on when a cure for a disease could be found from testing on animals. From my own personal view I have a huge heart for animals, but if we can not find other alternatives, and is possible we can find cures for diseases, then animals may be used for research, but only for medical reasons.