Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Argument about abortion
Abortion arguments against
Opposing arguments about abortion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Argument about abortion
Introduction The right to life is a fundamental right given to all Americans. Federal funding should not be used to destroy life. The right to life is found in the U.S. Declaration of Independence and reads as follow; We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights that among these are Life, Liberty and pursuit of Happiness (Madison, 1787) Lawmakers have introduced a bill that prohibits taxpayer’s money to fund abortions. Under the Hyde amendment, if a woman becomes pregnant due to rape, incest or when the life of the mother is in danger abortion is allowed. This bill prevents funds appropriated by the Federal law to be used to purchase an …show more content…
The interest of our nation is to preserve life, liberty, uniting and strengthening America to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT). The main intend with H.R.7 is to close ``a very broad loophole for federally funded abortions for any teenager” (CONGRESS). First I will address the purpose of the legislation and what it attempts to accomplish. Secondly, discuss why I agree and two reasons supporting my viewpoint. Lastly, I will discuss the oppositions view and their argument, concluding with a review of the legislation and restate why I agree with this bill. Brief Explanation of the No Taxpayers Funding for Abortion Act Representative Christopher H. Smith, R-NJ-4 introduced the bill to the House of Representatives on May 14, 2014 and was passed on January 28, 2014. H.R. 7 was referred to the Senate and read twice upon referring it to the Committee on Finance. The legislation is co-sponsor by one hundred seventy-one representatives and supported by the House Ways and Means, Energy and Commerce, and Judiciary. According to Congress Congregational Report: “H.R. 7, the ``No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act,'' would prohibit the Federal funding of abortions, except in cases of rape, incest or when the life of the mother is in
...ions over her own body; whether it is parenthood, adoption, contraception, or yes, abortion. After all, it is entirely plausible for people to be personally pro-life but politically pro-choice – this suggests that they respect each individuals’ rights over his or her own body and recognize that each woman should be allowed to have options. Regardless of whether or not she chooses to have the child, it is the fact that she has a choice that is crucial, and it is imperative that each woman have the freedom of individual autonomy. In order for this to occur, abortion must continue to be legal. Ultimately, being pro-choice is not necessarily advocating the use of abortion – it is about ensuring that abortion is legal so that women may have the option to exercise their right to individual autonomy and make the decisions that best reflects their stance in life.
According to Zastrow (2014), women burdened by unwanted children cannot receive proper job training (p. 560). If women who are already struggling have children, they will not be able to afford childcare, resulting in staying home and not working. Therefore, these women and their children are trapped in a vicious poverty and welfare cycle. Studies have shown that women who are denied access to an abortion are more likely to face financial hardships and receive public assistance after the denial. Women denied the procedure are three times as likely to end up below the federal poverty line, in comparison to women who are able to obtain care (The EACH Woman Act (H.R. 2972), 2016). Additionally, the children suffer especially if they live have to live in poverty with unmet needs. If there are bans on funding, women do not get the final say regarding their family structure. They do not have the autonomy to limit their families to the number of children they desire and can physically and emotionally manage to pay for. Because its effects resonate beyond the policy realm, there has been discontent with the Hyde Amendment since it was enacted in the
In the United States' Declaration of Independence the founding fathers stated: "…held certain truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness."
“It is my conviction that taxpayer funds should not be used to pay for abortions or advocate or actively promote abortion either here or abroad,” Bush stated in his memorandum to reinstate the Mexico City Policy. However, the policy does not state that funds will be withheld if the US taxpayer’s money is used; it states that monies will be withheld if abortion services are offered at all, even if it is not US money. Douglas Johnson the legislative director for the National Right to Life Committee states, the “government will no longer..try to legalize abortion in countries in Latin America, Africa, and Muslim countries in which people are strongly opposed to abortion and believe in the protection of unborn children.” What Johnson fails to recognize is that in countries where abortion is legal women’s rights are being compromised. U.S. Representative Christopher H. Smith expresses his feelings in his article “A Congressional View: The Unborn Must be Protected” (Global Issues Electronic Journal) by stating, “Abortion is child abuse.” Smith also comments that when the policy was previously in effect it had no affect on the family planning money received by NGO’s. It may not have affected the money received but it did affect women who were denied the option of abortion services.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."
Abortion is a very safe medical procedure and the risks of complications is less than 0.5%. When the procedure is done, it does not affect if the woman can get pregnant in the future or have babies. By taking away the right of abortion, it is taking away important rights. Taxpayer dollars are for poor women so they can have the same medical services as women who are rich. One of the medical services it provides is the ability to get an abortion. How can the government give money towards war efforts but not towards abortion? They can give funds for violence but not for
How would you feel if someone decided that you should never get a chance at life? That
For hundreds of years women helped each other to abort their pregnancies. Without legal prohibitions, women in Europe and the United States provided abortions and trained each other to perform the procedures. In the past century different states had begun to outlaw any procedure that would terminate or avoid pregnancy. In 1973(?) the United States Supreme Court asserted a woman's constitutional right to abortion in determining Roe v. Wade. After several decades of quiet disagreement, abortion has once again become a political hotbed. Under the direction of religious fundamentalists and fanatical anti-abortionists, this privacy right is in jeopardy. While both sides present strong arguments, these same positions have already been exhaustively debated and ruled upon by the Supreme Court. To turn back the clock on this issue would discriminate not only against women, but even more so against those in lower socio-economic groups. Therefore, the United States should protect a woman's Constitutional Right to choose.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness” (Jefferson). Thomas Jefferson, a white, Christian, political southern slave owner, wrote these words in 1776, a period in United States history when slavery thrived. The writer of the Declaration of Independence contradicts himself when he states that all men are created equal, when in actuality, his slaves were denied all that humans were meant to cherish.
One of the most well-known cases that have to do with abortion is Roe v. Wade. It is a Texas law that makes it a crime to assist women in getting an abortion and it also violates her due process rights. The case was ruled 7-2 that a right to privacy under the due process clause of the 14th amendment extended to a woman’s decision to have an abortion, but that right must be balanced against the states two legitimate interests in regulating abortion. The court rejected Roe’s outlook and started a national debate that whether or not or to what extent abortion should be legal to (Randolph). Roe argues that the person holding the baby has a right to have an abortion until viability. Which, I would have to agree with, because it should ultimately up to the carrier of the baby. The Hyde Amendment of 1973 prohibits the use of federal Medicaid funds to be used for abortions. From the pro-life stand point there was a bill that has been introduced to the House of Representatives called The Sanctity of Life Act. It was introduced in 1995 first and then reintroduc...
“The basic rights and freedoms to which all humans are entitled, often held to include the right to life and liberty, freedom of thought and expression, and equality before the law.”
With the issue of abortion, we are able to relate it easily to several principles throughout the Constitution. Every human has the right to make decisions about their own body, and this includes a woman’s right to terminate a pregnancy. The Constitution doesn’t classify an unborn baby as a human. Which leads straight in to the 14th amendment, a right for personal privacy and not allowing the government and Constitution to be a pressuring standpoint in this decision on whether you want to keep your child. As a human, we have the rights that no state shall make or enforc...
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal…” (Declaration of Independence,1776)
Abortion Taking out the trash, or taking a human life? That is what most the argument is with abortion, some believe that abortion is okay because the fetus is not yet a person, and that the fetus will be nothing but trouble. On the other side people believe that even all the way down to the zygote (when sperm meets the egg and earliest stage of pregnancy) there is a human growing in you. A growing boy or girl, with their own little fingers, and toes, their own cute as can be toothless smile, and their functioning organs. To them one day that zygote will turn into someone great, a person just like you and I that needs love just as you and I, a person that deserves to not get taken from our world before it even has a chance to take its first breath.
Abortion is one of those words that the true meaning depends on the person point of view. For me abortion is a medical procedure to end a pregnancy. This issue is very controversial, many people have different opinions or beliefs for or against it. In my particular case I’ve always been against it. Life begins at conception, unborn babies are human beings with the right to live just like us. An unborn baby is capable of feeling pain, just imagine the amount of pain they feel during abortion. Abortion is murder, why are women killing an innocent human being that is unable to make decisions for themselves. There are many ways to prevent abortion. Besides, this procedure is extremely dangerous, and contains many risks for the mother.