Arguments About People With Tattoos

I am writing to inform you that in your article about Charlotte Tumiltry you have made incorrect accusations about individuals with tattoos. Throughout this letter I will raise valid points and hopefully succeed in changing your point of view about people with tattoos.

Firstly, you argued that, “teachers shouldn’t have tattoos because it looks unprofessional”. Being professional has nothing to do with your looks. You are just making an assumption and saying that all of the human population who have been inked look unprofessional. This remark you made is incorrect and this is because the majority of people who are working in high class professions have tattoos. For example one of the most successful human beings in history was Muhammad Ali. Even though he had inking it didn’t stop him achieving his goal and in today’s society he is a role model to others. So if an educator gets a tattoo what difference would it make? She is still qualified enough to teach. Wouldn’t you be outraged if someone discriminated against you just because of your inking?

Furthermore, I believe that an individual may have a tattoo, no matter what field of work they are doing and this is because that

This is due to the fact that tattoos are a piece of art and they are considered as a very important piece of work. In fact it arguably is one of the oldest forms of painting in history. In books and Egyptian work we can perceive that tattoos are a fragment of history and they’re for people from negative backgrounds. People in cultures all around the world are “judging books by their covers” and bodies. The primary focus of modern tattoos is self-expression. The stereotypes associated with tattoos are slowly being disbanded and now accepted around the world in multiple countries. So if it doesn’t give other countries a bad reputation then why should it give Britain