Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of sugar essay
The consequences of consuming too much sugar essay
The consequences of consuming too much sugar essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of sugar essay
Should sugar be regulated by the government in the same way that tobacco and alcohol
The consumption of sugar in food has become more efforts to burn it have become less. Use of sugars in daily routine cannot be vomited, but people argue that it should be regulated. Excess use of sugar leads to diabetes which is a serious, chronic disease. “In 2017, an estimated 8.8 percent of the adult population worldwide had diabetes. This figure is projected to rise to 9.9 percent by the year 2045” (The statistics portal) which is an alarming issue to the current world. Sugar is a major element in processed foods (Chocolates, bakery Items, packed juice and chocolate milk etc…). It is believed that sugar should be regulated by the government in the same way that tobacco
…show more content…
Tobacco packets and Alcohol bottles were labeled as “Consumption is Dangerous to Life” and so should be placed on the processed/packed foods to warn the users. Many scientists have warned the world of the effects of using Alcohol and tobacco bringing pressure on the governments to regulate the usage. Now there is a call to treat sugar in the same way due to many serious health issues generated by the consumption of sugar and processed food. This essay will discuss arguments for and against sugar regulation.
A developing body demonstrates that fructose offer ascent to liver poisonous quality and persistent ailments. Dr. Barclay said that “Sugar consumption had dropped 23% since 1980. Despite this, over the same period cases of overweight or obese people had doubled, and diabetes had at least tripled” (Norrie, 2012). A small amount of sugar is not a problem but it kills the immune system if you take more. “The average U.S. adult downs 22 teaspoons of sugar a
Lustig, Robert, Laura Schmidt, and Claire Brindis. “The Toxic Truth About Sugar.” The Norton Sampler: Short Essays for Composition. Ed. Thomas Cooley. 8th ed. New York: Norton, 2013. 284-289. Print.
From the government, the media, and the sugar industry, he mentions the significant role of sugar in our society. He described how sugar play a role in the rise of adolescent type two diabetes from year 1980s of zero case and year 2010 of more than 50,000 cases. Citing the movie, he talks about the overwhelming political influence of the sugar lobbyist, convincing Americans to consume more sugar. He mentioned how addictive sugar in comparison to the effects of cocaine. Also, he explains how sugar consumption is greater than the sugar intake of Americans in the
Have you ever thought if there was a way to improve our health. This article “Soda Showdown” by “Rebecca Zissou”, discusses whether we should tax all sugary drinks or whether we should not tax sugary drinks. There is two point of views in this article. One of the point of views say that we should tax sugary drinks, while the other side says we should not tax sugary drinks.
Since nearly the invention of commercially sweetened foods and advertising that celebrates their goodness, sugary foods and drinks have been identified as the cause of several chronic diseases, contributing to poor health. When a person’s diet contains a lot of sugar, especially when it begins early in life, it is likely to cause health problems and possibly death at a young age. For these and many other reasons, it is essential to carry out research in order to establish the extent to which these foods affect people’s health. In gaining more information on this issue, the argument can be made that the government should ban sugary foods and drinks should be sold in elementary and middle schools.
since sugar affects the mind of an individual the same as some drugs that it should be regulated like one? Do individuals want to treat sugar as if it's alcohol and not make it illegal but put a age limit? People know that if they make regulated sugar people will still get it easily because it is everywhere. If sugar was regulated or was needed to be reduced in foods many companies would be mad. Many food companies rely on sugar in there foods for better sells and money. Sugar in foods is what makes their products addictive and liked to consumers. Researchers believe that sugar can be more addictive than hardcore drugs.
You can find sugar in most foods. Everything from salad dressing to canned soup. Even the bread we eat has a high concentration of sugar. All of the sugar that America is intakes is starting to add up. Today two out of three adults and one out of three children in the United States are overweight. These illnesses would be far less prevalent if we dialed back our consumption of sugar. Not to say that sugar is the main reason for diabetes, but it is definitely a determining factor. Eating too much of
As Carden explains, each individual is responsible for his own diet, health and body, sugar taxation may work for a while, but when people want something, they get it ,no matter how, where or the cost. So the government would invest a lot of money and other resources to reduce sugar consumption, but at the end people would continue consuming sugar. It would be a waste of time, resources and money. Carden is absolutely right in that point, it may sound a bit selfish, but it is true.
“To do nothing… would be reckless from a public health and a fiscal standpoint” (Jacobson, 2012, para. 5). When someone uses the word epidemic, we think of sick people or a horrifying disease. That is not what most people think about when they see a bottle of their favorite soda. This has become much more than routine heath concerns. Soda and sugary drinks have become an epidemic in the world, with much of this found in our very own country. In recent years, studies have shown that sugar has increased in our everyday foods, it has also caused the rate of obesity to go soaring, as well as other health issues, namely: diabetes, heart disease, and other diet-related conditions (Jacobson, 2012, para. 2). Do we need all this excess sugar in our
Brownwell, Kelly D and Thomas R. Frieden, “Ounces of Prevention- The Public Policy Case for Taxes on Sugared Beverages.” The New England Journal of Medicine 30 Apr. 2009: 1805-808.
Sugary soft drinks should be taxed in order to change people’s habit of drinking these towards the goal of
Unfortunately, the widespread availability of sugar makes it difficult for parents and children to make healthy, convenient food and drink choices. This is especially important for kids who are still developing their nutritional foundation, metabolism, and hormones, even a little sugar can be harmful. Would you give your children a bottle of poison and allow them to consume it? Of course not, what parent would. But unknowingly that’s exactly what you are doing when you provide your children with any type of sugary drink whether it be fruit juice or a fizzy drink. A 600ml bottle of soft drink can contain up to 16 teaspoons of sugar. The permeation of sugar through today’s society makes it plainly clear to see that placing a tax on sugary drinks is not enough to combat child obesity. This solution is not enough to overcome this issue in the long term. It needs to be coupled with a strong educational campaign which targets, not only children in schools, but adults in the community through both television, radio and
The average American eats 156 pounds of added sugar each year. Sugar is delicious and once we have it, our body constantly wants more. Added sugar has become an American epidemic. “Eighty percent, or 480,000 of the 600,000 food products sold within the U.S. have added sugar, which, according to researchers and medical doctors, is why we have the world 's highest obesity rate is at 31 percent,” (Fed Up). The addictive quality of added sugar makes our brains want more of it constantly; however, our bodies are being negatively affected by its consumption in many ways.
After reading "The Toxic Truth About Sugar" and "Banning the Big Gulp", I am not entirely convinced that government intervention is necessary. Lustig, Schmidt and Brindis' article practically clarifies the the dangers of sugar itself, while Bittman's article passionately discusses the temporary cessation of the decision to ban/restrict the sale of over-proportioned drinks. Although, as Lustig and his colleagues pointed out, sugar has potential for addiction and other long term detriment to health and economy, the authors failed to acknowledge the fact that people can still watch what they eat. For example, a 1.9lb (862g) bag of Sour Patch Kids contains approximately 550 grams of sugar; 26g per single serving of 16 pieces (40g). Lustig and his
We are all familiar with sugar. It is sweet, delicious, and addictive; yet only a few of us know that it is deadly. When it comes to sugar, it seems like most people are in the mind frame knowing that it could be bad for our health, but only a few are really taking the moderate amounts. In fact, as a whole population, each and everyone of us are still eating about 500 extra calories per day from sugar. Yes, that seems like an exaggerated number judging from the tiny sweet crystals we sprinkle on our coffee, but it is not. Sugar is not only present in the form of sweets and flavourings, it is hidden in all the processed foods we eat. We have heard about the dangers of eating too much fat or salt, but we know very little about the harmful effects of consuming too much sugar. There still isn’t any warnings about sugar on our food labels, nor has there been any broadcasts on the serious damages it could do to our health. It has come to my concern during my research that few