Argumentative Essay On Syrian Civil War

715 Words2 Pages

For four years, Syria has been in it what has become one of the worst humanitarian crises of our time. Since, March 15, 2011 more than 320,000 people have died and 3.9 million people have fled the country, and a further 7.6 million are currently, internally displaced in the Syrian Civil War. In conclusion, the United States of America has a moral imperative to step in and stop the escalating humanitarian crisis. Not intervening after Syria crossed “the red line,” set by President Barack Obama sends the message to future and present powers that may threaten American interest, that America’s warnings can be ignored, combined with the rising death toll, and thousands of Syrians dangerously crossing the border, only to live in appalling refugee camps, the United States of America cannot sit back and watch. …show more content…

Reciprocating, President Obama responded with, “…We have been very clear to the Assad regime, but also to other players on the ground, that a red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized...” This statement illustrates, the U.S. will not stand for chemical weapons being used or even being moved. Yet after confirming, Syria’s government was using chemical weapons against its citizens in 2013, the United States did nothing. Consequently, by standing by and doing nothing, the United States of America sends the message to North Korea and Iran, that in their pursuit of nuclear weapons it is okay to ignore the U.S.’s

Open Document