Argumentative Essay On Netflix

984 Words2 Pages

Verizon’s cease and desist order to Netflix represents the overall stance ISPs have towards net neutrality. Although there are many reasons to support net neutrality, opponents of it point out that there are benefits to avoiding net neutrality. One of the main arguments against net neutrality is that it raises the cost of infrastructure for data networks. On December 10, 2014, 60 large companies sent a letter to the White House stating that the classifying the internet as a common carrier would stifle the growth of the industry (Aguilar). Marc Andreessen, a co-founder of NetScape, states that the large investment in the infrastructure of the internet needs to show promising returns and that the FCC’s efforts are difficult to realize because they marginalize those returns by preventing ISPs from doing certain …show more content…

Perhaps the most prominent person to hold this opinion is Peter Thiel, a founder of Paypal, who said: “The Internet is not broken, and it got here without government regulation and probably in part because of lack of government regulation" (NR Interview). Opponents of net neutrality like Peter Thiel state that the internet is fine as it is and has been because the internet is evolving without the intervention of the government. To further the argument that net neutrality regulation is unnecessary, Ajit Pai has stated:
The evidence of these continuing threats? There is none; it's all anecdote, hypothesis, and hysteria. A small ISP in North Carolina allegedly blocked VoIP calls a decade ago. Comcast capped BitTorrent traffic to ease upload congestion eight years ago. Apple introduced Facetime over Wi-Fi first, cellular networks later. Examples this picayune and stale aren't enough to tell a coherent story about net neutrality. The bogeyman never had it so easy

More about Argumentative Essay On Netflix

Open Document