Are People Held Responsible For Their Pets Actions

793 Words2 Pages

Pet Owners are Held Responsible for their Pets Actions You're in a beautiful august day when all of the sudden you feel a animal jump on your back. The impact drops you to the floor and the collision you break your arm. The dog which attacked you didn’t just stopped there; he ferociously bit your forearm and jerked his head till he ripped through your flesh. Where are you supposed to get the money for your medication? Pet owners should be held responsible both legally and financially for their pets behavior because pets are just like any other animal and could change in a matter of seconds; they are also unpredictable which makes them treacherous. To begin with, people may argue that they didn’t know their pets behavior was that way, however they should've …show more content…

For example circuses, lions which are tamed to preform are still dangerous. They may say, "they're a playful one," but the animal could have a behavior shift, a change in behavior that could happen within seconds. This is what makes an animal more dangerous because you don’t know their next move. They are able to bring death upon you in a matter if seconds only because it's a part of their nature in being wild. Having a pet that belongs in the wild could be dangerous because it is said that a animal that has been tamed is only half a step away from being wild again. For example, in the golden lion award the lion who was tamed attacked the owner when he gave him his back for a second. In conclusion, pet owners should be held responsible both legally and financially for their pets actions because as stated before they cause fatal casualties. Not all pet are dangerous, but a loose pet is always a dangerous even if it’s a cat. Be a responsible pet owner and buy your pet the correct gear and harnesses to protect others but most important for your pets safety as

More about Are People Held Responsible For Their Pets Actions

Open Document