Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Rhetorical Analysis

469 Words1 Page

"The Arctic National Refuge stands alone as America's last truly great wilderness." These are the words of former President Jimmy Carter as mentioned in Subhankar Banerjee's book "Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and Land, A Photographic Journey." Carter strongly believes that the Arctic National Refuge in America must be preserved. He argues that establishing industrial plants in the refuge will destroy the habitats of many different species, affecting the ecosystem around them. His claims are backed up using various different rhetorical strategies. President Carter begins with a tale of his trip to the refuge with his wife. By telling the readers of his voyage, he is clarifying that he has a background in this topic, and that he has seen it first hand. Because of this ethos, the readers will have the idea that he is experienced and knows what he is talking about. This way, they are likely to believe many of his following claims. However, since he is a former president, it is already implied that he would be a credible source to be trusted by the readers. …show more content…

It is almost nothing and 1 to 2% wouldn't make much of an impact. He points out the fact that many former presidents before him had acknowledged the value of such natural habitats, and already passed acts in favor of protecting it. However, by signing the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, which expands the land covered by the original act from 1960, he shows that he is serious about conserving this precious wildlife. By mentioning these various acts, he is trying to rally the readers to join him in the fight for

Open Document