Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Post apocalyptic literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Post apocalyptic literature
The apocalypse of the birds continues, even after three months, isolating Nat’s family knowing that he is the sole survivor of the nearby area. Nat and his family have enough food from nearby stores that have dead bodies of the public that thought of this attack as a mere change of weather. Time goes so slow for Nat’s family that they could feel the earth rotating fifteen degrees per hour. To extinguish the boredom of the children Nat proclaimed, “Let’s teach the Jill and Johnny so they can advance in their education.” Johnny was excited to get taught because he had never experienced school. Jill, however, was displeased with this idea. Jill complained, “I don’t want to learn with these birds peaking their beaks at the door and window. Nat’s …show more content…
Nat now had applied accordion hurricane shutters on the windows, that he found in the market that supplied with such items knowing there might be a storm. Nat had to travel extra miles to get food from the city. He didn’t get too much knowing that the time was limited for him to get back. On one regular day, Nat’s wife was teaching the kids with the regular tapping of the beaks and flapping of feathers the wife got irritated. She yelled, “I can’t take it anymore. The noise, the same old routine day and night, and the constant fear of being killed. I just can’t take it. I have to stay cooped in this house knowing that everyone else is dead.” She strained to open the door, and she spotted a hammer and crushed the wood and yanked the door open. Instantaneously the birds pecked her to death. Hearing the agonizing pain, Nat hurried to the door. Shocked to see her wife had opened the door when the birds were still attacking, left him speechless. His body paralyzed for a second, and he rushed to the door slamming it. He poured every ounce of energy he had to keep the door closed. Eventually, he couldn’t hold on and fell. Promptly the birds attacked Nat, and while he was fading away, he saw the children trying to fight off the
In the narrative poem “Cautionary Tale of Girls and Birds of Prey” the author, Sandy Longhorn, tells the story of a young girl who is afraid of a hawk, and her inconsiderate father who doesn’t take her concerns seriously. The story shows how her father is determined to get rid of her fear of the hawk, because he thinks it is both foolish and childish. The daughter very well knows the capability of the hawk, however her father doesn’t acknowledge it until it is too late. In the poem, Longhorn uses alliteration and rhyme to help explore the theme of how being inconsiderate towards others can in the end hurt you as much as it hurts them. The poem takes place on a little farm where the girl and her father live with all of their livestock.
The documentary, Lost Sparrow, is a very compelling production of one man’s quest to not only help his family deal with some of the trauma’s they had long been suffering from, it was also created to tell the story and hopefully shed some light on the conflicting story of the disappearance and death of his Native American adoptive brothers, Bobby and Tyler. Initially my overall takeaway from this documentary was a mixture of curiosity which quickly turned into confusion. “How did the boys (Bobby and Tyler) end up on the tracks?” and “Why were they running away in the first place?” were two questions that confused, lead me to be curious, and slightly suspicious very early in the viewing. Upon initial completion of the documentary my sole thought
Gatto begins his article by explaining that boredom is an everyday issue in modern schooling. Teachers struggle with boredom due to the attitudes and behavior of students and find it exhausting to teach kids when they behave in an immature manner. However, students also become frustrated with the repetition of useless information, as well as being forced to fit society’s standards. Gatto shifts the focus to his thoughts on the importance of mandatory schooling. He thinks that the lengthy school days are completely unnecessary.
On August 29th, 2005, Hurricane Katrina, the most expensive hurricane in American history, made landfall in Louisiana with winds of one hundred and twenty-seven miles per hour (“Hurricane Katrina Statistics Fast Facts”). The sheer magnitude of the amount of lives and property lost was enormous, and it was triggered simply by warm ocean waters near the Bahamas ("How Hurricane Katrina Formed"). Nature was indifferent to whether the raging winds and rain would die off in the ocean or wipe out cities; it only follows the rules of physics. A multitude of American authors has attempted to give accounts and interpretations of their encounters with the disinterested machine that is nature. Two authors, Stephen Crane and Henry David Thoreau, had rather contrasting and conflicting interpretations of their own interactions with nature. Crane’s work, “The Open Boat,” is story based on his experience as a survivor
He does not provide statistics or matter-of-fact statements to present the outcomes of Katrina. Instead, Rose writes about what he himself experiences as a result of the storm. This author is not weaving together a tale of imaginary faces in an attempt to gain sympathy. He writes as himself experiencing instances of tragedy, camaraderie, and despondency. There is no logical format for what subject matter he may explore. In this anthology of articles he utilizes dark humor, such as when he writes of the stench and subsequent war of refrigerators; optimism, such as when he describes the characters that remain and the absoluteness of Mardi Gras; nostalgia, such as when he reflects upon memories with his children and his first visit to New Orleans; and dejection, such as instances when he himself begins to lose hope and realize the poor outlook for his
The birds attack in the same way also. They come through the house, peck at the windows, and try to come through the doors. They succeed in coming through upstairs in both the film and the short story.
The broken bird cage was a vital clue for whoever killed Mr. Wright. In the text, the author says how, “Mrs. Peters was examining the bird-cage. “Look at this door,” she said slowly. “It’s broke. Someone pulled apart the cage hinge.” Bird cages are pretty easy
• When Doug would babysit on Saturday nights at the Daugherty’s house, he would read each of the five kids a book.
that pigeons must deal with in order to function in their society, calling pigeons “the spiks
Nat Hocken and his family were in a fight against deadly birds, and they boarded the windows, doors, and chimneys to survive the attacks of the birds. Then, Nat lied to his children because they were too young to understand the deadly attack results. He also lied because his children need to stay as calm as the ocean on a warm sunny day. Nat lied to his wife because she did not need to know what had happened to the Trigg’s. Overall, the Hocken’s survived the birds because of the bravery of
Mrs. Wright, however, justified killing her husband due to Mr. Wright trapping her inside the house and how Mrs. Wright job is only to be domestic wife. When Mrs. Hale (farmer’s wife) and Mrs. Peters (sheriff’s wife) discovered a dead bird with her neck bruised all over, they start to put the pieces to the puzzle together and ...
After the birds attack Nat and his family the first time, Nat tries to warn all of his neighbors that they could potentially be in danger. Nat, realizing he and his family could be in danger, as well, boards up the windows, blocks the doors and does anything that would help keep his family safe. Nat’s character is shown most effectively when he is invited by Mr. Trigg to go shooting with several of his neighbors and instead of going decides to “...get along home…” (15) This shows the conflict in Nat and how his choices affect the story. With the choice of going with his neighbors and having some “fun” after a stressful day and terrifying previous night, he once again chooses to stay with his family and keep them safe. This moral constitution of Nat makes him a very powerful and resistant character to the reader and the characters in the book
The film focuses on the character and their relationships. Trapped in the house while the birds are attacking is Mitch, his mom, Lydia, his ex-girlfriend Annie, and his sister Cathy. All of these women are looking for Mitch's attention. He is the object of desire in the room. His mother clearly seems threatened in the film by any women trying to get his attention away from her. The tension in the house is only interrupted when the birds attack. These character dynamics are also very unique to the film, however, even in the original short story, Nat is also in a setting where he is trying to break the tension in his house hold and assure his family. For example, Nat continues tell his wife and children that things are going to be alright, even when the radio goes out.
...; The birds are also a manifestation of Melanie's fear of emotional relationship and her struggle with Mitch and with Lydia over Mitch. The first gull attacks Melanie when she realizes that she was successful in manipulating Mitch into following her. The most violent attack occurs after a conversation between Mitch and Melanie about the anger Melanie feels about being abandoned by her mother. Each succeeding attack wears away at Melanie until she has lost it completely by the end of the film. As the film progresses, there are no longer any illusions about Melanie being in control. In conclusion, Melanie is completely dependent upon anyone who will help her. We watch Melanie, helpless in the car with Lydia who smiles beneficently down on Melanie; in return Melanie stares yearningly into Lydia's eyes, having finally found the mother she has been searching for.
In Birds, when one sex is a different size than the other, it is typically the male that is larger. However, in Hawks and Eagles, Falcons and Owls, the female is often larger than the male. Why?