Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Philosophies of creon in antigone
Antigone and creon tragedy
Antigone and creon tragedy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Philosophies of creon in antigone
I do agree. As a context, let's consider both the author and Greek society at the time of the play. Sophocles was a deeply religious man who held firm to the belief that the "modern" thinking of many philosophers, one in which man was slowly become a course of study, rather than a belief in the Gods as the center of the universe, was wrong. Antigone, in this sense, is more the voice of the author. She argues that man can never usurp the Gods in importance, whereas Creon represents the view that the "polis," or society was of premiere importance. Creon argues that there must be law and order, despite what we think the Gods are telling us about morality and common decency. In essence, he believes that we honor the Gods more by keeping peace …show more content…
good." I think that the fundamental issue that comes out of the work is the basic definition of what it means to place value on beliefs in a heterogeneous social order. It would be easier if the battle was between "good vs. bad," but where Hegel, and Sophocles, found tension and true tragedy was in the action of having to choose between two equally desirable, but ultimately incompatible courses of action. Prior to Creon's own renouncement of his stubbornness, there is an agonizing choice to be made. On one hand, there is Creon with the word of the law as representing justice. On the other hand, Antigone presents her conception of justice as transcending the law. Both carry significant implications that have to cause some level of pause within the reader/ audience. If we validate Creon as being right, then it speaks to the absolute certainty of the political and social order, an order of individuals as carrying transcendent quality to it. If we validate Antigone, then it speaks to the idea that anyone is able to raise question to this system, and bring doubt into a realm where certainty is needed. At the same time, if we validate both characters, we also sanction the pain caused to those who have the unfortunate distinction of being in love with them. These characters become collateral damage in the tragic drama between two competing notions of the good. It is here where tragedy is evident. For this reason, I would have to see Hegel's view as one consistent with Classical tragedy, forcing agony and pain out of choice, and being the direct purpose of Sophocles in the construction of the
A tragedy is when someone drops my chocolate milkshake from Chick-Fil-A in the parking lot, but the Greek definition of a tragedy is,”a play in which the protagonist, usually a man of importance and outstanding personal qualities, falls to disaster through the combination of a personal failing and circumstances with which he cannot deal”(Collins). In Sophocles’ play Antigone, Creon is the most tragic character because of his hubris, hamartia, and he is the primary Antagonist.
In the play Antigone by Sophocles, the differences in Creon’s and Antigone’s passions and responsibilities helped illustrate both characters central flaws. By doing so, the play was also able to imply that in order to achieve a sense of inner peace and political stability; one has to be able to balance the two powers equally. Antigone and Creon are both very determined, zealous characters who were unable to achieve the stability because they were both unwilling to compromise. Often times, personal events or emotions can cause people to overlook moral or civil laws.
... by vultures because she had a strong belief in family honor and the will of the gods, one which as long as no harm is done should be upheld above other laws. There are two competing forms of justice throughout “Antigone” which inform the argument of whether or not Antigone should have followed Creon’s laws through the tension of the city state and the will of the people as well as the gods. Creon’s argument was flawed in his disregard for public opinion and that he overlooked Antigone’s valid argument because of her gender and his pride. Antigone argues that a mortal man cannot override the will of the gods, a valid argument of the times. It is and was crucially important to fully consider the best interest of the citizens that is being voiced at the time of decision making, if it is not taken into consideration the city, as seen in Thebes will fall into shambles.
In the story of Antigone, neither Creon nor Antigone can be considered either right or wrong due to the nature of their mistakes. While Creon has the state’s best interest in heart when he goes against tradition and declares that all traitors will be denied a proper burial, Antigone has her Polyneices’ best interest at heart when she betrays this law and performs a proper burial for him. Creon looks to political law to guide him, while Antigone looks to divine law. In a more contemporary setting, a similar situation can be seen in the recent debates around Canada’s laws regarding men who have sex with men donating blood. Neither side of the debate is right nor wrong, but both provide strong arguments.
When people fail to attempt to tolerate, listen and understand others ideas it often results in adversities and distress amongst themselves and their acquaintances. This is exemplified in the actions of Antigone and Creon in the playwright of Antigone. Both Antigone and Creon are headstrong and tenacious and stick to their ideals and ambitions. However, with their tunnel vision personality traits, it often leads them to fail to recognize the views of others, which ultimately results in tragedy. Both Antigone and Creon’s lack of consideration into the views of others leads to the the outcomes of many unnecessary deaths, and the suicide of both Antigone and Haemon. However, the tragedies exemplified from the failure to recognize the views of
I believe in the quote and believe that the real sins in Antigone were being stubborn and prideful, theses are also the traits of the two potential tragic hero, Creon and Antigone, I believe that the true tragic hero is Antigone.
“There are many strange and wonderful things, but nothing more strangely wonderful than man” (388-389).
The views of Antigone and Creon are opposed, and they both possess the same stubborn belief in their own righteousness. This ultimately brings them both to their tragic fate. At first we believe that Creon acts from sincere, patriotic and unselfish motives, and that he is acting out of a sincere belief that his decision is best for the state. This is shown in the first episode (lines 163 - 331), where Creon hopes to be a wise and good ruler. Later on we learn that he is too inflexible and narrow to heed criticism or admit fault, and that this causes all the misery in his life. The same is true of Antigone. She appears to be a very compassionate individual in the prologue; however, later on we learn that she is also stubborn and unwilling to bend in her beliefs, which ultimately leads her to her tragic fate.
In Sophocles’ Antigone, the opposing sides of two moral rights are pitted against each other and are examined. King Creon holds the power of human law and reasoning supreme, while Antigone looks to the divine decrees of the gods to be of greatest truth. They both traverse the play remaining one-sided and blinded in their views and even become cold to the idea of the opposing view. Yet they each maintain certain moral virtues they are mounted in, which are true and righteous in their own respect. Although they are both justified, and there are instances and certain considerations to the facts in which one is more justified than the other, I argue that Antigone is more just in her beliefs simply from her actions and how she carries herself throughout
In the awe-inspiring play of Antigone, Sophocles introduces two remarkable characters, Antigone and Creon. A conflict between these two obstinate characters leads to fatal consequences for themselves and their kindred. The firm stances of Creon and Antigone stem from two great imperatives: his loyalty to the state and her dedication to her family, her religion but most of all her conscience. The identity of the tragic hero of this play is still heavily debated. This tragedy could have been prevented if it had not been for Creon's pitiful mistakes.
Antigone and Oedipus, written by Sophocles, are dramatic plays with a tragic ending. The main theme for Antigone is that people sometimes have to learn the hard way from their mistakes. This theme is expressed in the final four lines of the play. They read, There is no happiness where there is no wisdom; No wisdom but in submission to the gods. Big words are always punished, And proud men in old age learn to be wise. These lines are an important part of the play. They symbolize Creon's bad decisions he made, his defiance to the gods, the punishment he went through because of his edict, and the wisdom he gained because of all his mistakes. "There is no happiness where there is no wisdom" demonstrates how Creon not using wisdom in his decision affected him. By declaring that Polyneices could not have a proper burial, he went against the gods and the other citizens of Thebes's beliefs. This was not a wise decision on his part, and because of it he lost his wife, his son, and his happiness. Creon also defied the laws of the gods. This is what is expressed in the line, "No wisdom but in submission to the gods." In Antigone, the edict and decisions that Creon made demonstrated that his law was more important then the gods laws. His defiance of the laws eventually made him believe, by talking to Teirisias, that something bad would happen to him, so he gave in to his decision.
...efuses to give in on account that Antigone is a women. The play might have ended very differently if Antigone would have been a man. Thirdly Sophocles shows the importance of religion. The thing that gets Creon into trouble in the first place is denying his nephew proper burial rights, when that is what the Gods decree should be given to all those that die. Creon shows that he is a very stubborn man. The only thing that sways him is a prophet's promise of terrible retribution if he does not comply with the will of the God's.
In the beginning of Antigone, we see Antigone struggling with the conflicting expectations between divine law and man’s law. The problem throughout the play is Antigone is a believer in divine law while Creon is a believer in man’s law. In the first scene, Antigone tells her sister that she will defy Creon’s law and bury her brother. Antigone says, “He has no right to keep me from my own” (Sophocles 1008). She believes in divine law even if it means breaking man’s law. Creon commanded no one to bury her brother. Antigone knows it is not the right choice according to divine law and she should be able to bury her own brother, but Creon believes no one should break the law he has put before everyone. Ismene replies, “ The law is strong, we must give in to the law, in this thing and in worse. I bet the dead to forgive me, but I am helpless: I must yield to those in authority” (Sophocles 1009). Antigone ...
“I know it too, and I am shaken in my mind. To yield is awful; but, by standing firm, to strike with my ruin my proud heart-why, that is awful too.” (Sophocles 1095-1097). Creon in the play, Antigone, by Sophocles plays a major role as the tragic king of Thebes and the uncle of Antigone. Creon and Antigone’s conflicting relationship highlights Creon’s tragic figure. In the play Creon tries to establish decisions for the common good of Thebes, but his results end in great tragedy. In this play, I sympathize more with the character Creon because he puts Thebes above everything else which makes him blind to what is happening around him and he ends up losing more than Antigone. While Antigone loses her brothers but remains strong and fights for what she believes is morally right until she chooses her own demise, Creon loses his family and ends up alone and can not fix his actions.
The failures of Creon leadership represent the limitations of autocratic government and thereby serve to promote democracy. At the play’s opening, Creon is portrayed sympathetically. He presents his decree preventing the burial of Polynices as just retribution for his crimes against Thebes and as an effective way to prevent pollution (Sophocles 62). He feels further vindicated because the chorus, consisting of elder representatives of the populace, supports the decree. Even Antigone’s impassioned defence, which invokes the “unwritten and unfailing” (73) laws of the gods, appears to have no impact on the chorus, who states that “she does not know how to bend amidst her troubles” (74). This perception of Creon begins to shift upon Antigone’s death sentence. Although the punishment seems as cruel and excessive, Creon firmly believes it to be a necessary deed. He is “eager to display his full control of a crisis barely averted...