Anti-Motherhood In Macbeth

855 Words2 Pages

From ancient empires to the inheritance of simple family farms, the passing down of kingships and property has depended on patrilinearity. Maternity is essential to maintain this patrilineage. In Macbeth, Shakespeare vilifies Lady Macbeth as the anti-mother because she rejects patrilineal expectations. By both vilifying her maternal agency and using Lady MacDuff as a foil to Lady Macbeth’s anti-maternal attitudes, Shakespeare endorses traditional maternal values of Early Modern England.
Lady Macbeth’s maternal agency is a threat to Macbeth’s lineage, which casts her and her anti-motherhood, as an antagonist. According to Stephanie Chamberlain, Lady Macbeth’s, “threat of maternal agency (Chamberlain 76),” is negatively depicted in the play because …show more content…

Lady Macbeth’s multiple references to motherhood in these distinctly unpleasant ways disclose her more brutal nature, effectively having her perceived as foul and therefore more aligned to antagonism in the play. Additionally, in his soliloquy in 3.1, Macbeth bemoans his childless state, his “fruitless crown and… barren scepter” (Shakespeare 3.1 60-61). Lady Macbeth wields power, or at least undermines the expectations of her femininity and her role in perpetuating patrilinearity, by not having children. In 1.5, in her famous invocation soliloquy, she distances herself from the female sex, saying, “Unsex me here” (Shakespeare 1.5 40). This demonstrates her rejection of the maternal demands of patrilinearity. Furthermore, the only one Macbeth fears is Banquo (Shakespeare 3.1 53-54), but it is only the “possession of an heir which elevates Banquo above Macbeth, ensuring that the patrilineal future of [Macbeth] this bloody and barren usurper is denied (Chamberlain 83).” Banquo’s son’s future success lies in the fact that Macbeth will not have children, the blame for which can be foisted on Lady Macbeth’s rejection of

Open Document