Annotated Bibliography
Ascher, Abraham. The Russian Revolution: Beginners Guides. London: Oneworld, 2014.
This publication is example of the entrance of text into the mainstream public. The moment a historical topic is formatted for public review at a general academic level notes a key process of historiography. Ascher is one of several modern historians who made the information easily understandable for people living outside academia.
Ferro, Marc. "The Russian Solider in 1917: Undisciplined, Patriotic, and Revolutionary." Slavic Review 30, no. 3 (1971): 483.
Marc Ferro is a French historian specializing in Russian and USSR history. In this Publication in 1971, he creates a general picture of the Russian soldier. Utilizing a synopsis
…show more content…
A Peoples Tragedy: The Russian Revolution 1891-1924. New York: Penguin Publishing, 1998. Figes is a professor of history with emphasis on Russian theory. His publication is another example of the transition of historiography into the mainstream public arena. More detailed than Ascher’s work, he organizes the information debated over the last 70 years into any easy to read discussion for all levels.
Fitzpatrick, Sheila. The Russian Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.
Published in 1982, Fitzpatrick applies the cultural and emotional lens to the Russian revolution. It is vital to identify when lenses and methods expand in the historiography of subject. The flow from primary data, research, and theoretical papers leading to detailed publications is vital when reviewing the historiography of any topic. This is a brave and pioneering effort in history that expands off the popular political and military lenses applied to the Russian
…show more content…
Published in 1990, it is the most detailed discussion of the events from a cultural, social, political, military, and psychological lens. Pipes argues that the revolution was an act of terror and leans the audience to the theories of an intelligentsia created coup d’état in contrast to the more popular theory of social uprising. One of the most well referenced book of the modern era it triggered an avalanche of research and counter publications on the Russian Revolutionary era. He formally establishes the philosophy that no information following the rise of communism is accurate and was routinely fabricated by the leadership for
Tucker, Robert C. "Stalinism as Revolution from Above". Stalinism. Edited by Robert C. Tucker. New York: American Council of Learned Societies, 1999.
Moss, W., 2014. A History of Russia Volume 2: Since 1855. 1st ed. London, England: Anthem Press London, pp.112-113.
Fiehn, Terry, and Chris Corin. Communist Russia under Lenin and Stalin. London: John Murray, 2002. Print.
Westwood, J. N., “Endurance and Endeavour: Russian history, 1812-1980”. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 1981.
The Slavophile and westernizer conflict is an inherent cultural question that Russians must answer about their country. Russian thinkers have long been fragmented between the Westernizer and the Slavophile viewpoint. Both disagreed about the true nature of the country as well as its relation with the West. It is a problem that has plagued Russia for centuries, and continues to do so to this day. Adopting the mindset of recognizing this conflict is essential to better understanding Russian history as well as the motives and thought processes of Russian leaders today.
There are many people who have lived through and within the Bolshevik Revolution, so there are a multitudinous variety of perspectives, thoughts, and insights about the revolution. The Bolshevik Revolution is known for many things; some say that the revolution helped women become free of control, and others proclaim that it did nothing but continue to hold women captive of their desired rights. The Bolshevik Revolution article states the side of a history professor Richard Stites, who argues yes the revolution benefited the women whilst the other side is declared no the revolution did no justice for women at all, which was argued by a Russian scholar, Lesly A. Rimmel. The opposing arguments both create an effective view on the revolution, and
I recollect as a child how I cherished the way my mom took care of me and made all my executive decisions. I recall getting excited about my weekly allowances and about her picking out my clothes for school. However, when I became a teenager I wanted my independence. I know longer wanted her to buy my clothing and I wanted to financially support myself by getting a job. I was so tired of her telling me what to do and how to do it that I revolted. At first it was difficult trying to establish independence in my mother's house, but after a while it seemed as if I had won the battle. Unbeknownst to me that battle would be short-lived and ultimately my mom won the war. Basically, I had constructed my own crazy revolution against my mother. You see a revolution is “a fundamental change in political organization; especially: the overthrow or renunciation of one government or ruler and the substitution of another by the governed .Activity or movement designed to affect fundamental changes in the socioeconomic situation (Webster Dictionary).”One revolution that is said to have inspired communism was the Russian Revolutions of 1917.
High, S. (1924, Nov 26). Will there be a russian peasants' revolt? Outlook (1893-1924), 138, 495. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/137018151?accountid=147304
The resignation of Nicholas II March 1917, in union with the organization of a temporary government in Russia built on western values of constitutional moderation, and the capture of control by the Bolsheviks in October is the political crucial opinions of the Russian Revolution of 1917. The actions of that historic year must also be viewed more broadly, however: as aburst of social strains associated with quick development; as a disaster of political modernization, in relations of the tensions sited on old-fashioned traditions by the burdens of Westernization; and as a social disruption in the widest sense, concerning a massive, unprompted expropriation of upper class land by fuming peasants, the devastation of outmoded social patterns and morals, and the scuffle for a new, democratic society.
Wood, A. (1986). The Russian Revolution. Seminar Studies in History. (2) Longman, p 1-98. ISBSN 0582355591, 9780582355590
Platt, Kevin M. F. and David Brandenberger, eds. Epic Revisionism: Russian History and Literature as Stalinist Propaganda. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 2006.
1) Adams, Arthur E. The Russian Revolution and Bolshevik Victory: Why and How? Boston: D.C. Heath and Company, 1960.
middle of paper ... ... Exploring the October revolution and the establishment of communism, Richard Pipes concludes that the origin of communism can be traced back to the distant past of Russia’s history. Pipes states that Russia had entered a period of crisis after the governments of the 19th century undertook a limited attempt at capitalisation, not trying to change the underlying patrimonial structures of Russian society. (Pipes, 1964) An unrelenting series of war’s, unnecessary hunger and famine and the selfish greed of the ruling elite.