Annexation Of The Philippines Dbq Analysis

461 Words1 Page

America Conquering the Philippines.
The annexation of the Philippines by the United States of America was a controversial topic in the 1900’s due to the American population arguing whether it was a good idea or if the decision was moving against America’s constitutional values. Although the information may be true, after reviewing the primary sources, it is obvious the United States should not have annexed the Philippines.
All the arguments claimed during this period pointed to the Philippines to be annexed to America and get the statehood. Thus, many people held their opinions based on the Constitution principles claiming to leave the citizens from the southeast island alone as America did with the British Empire. Moreover, the platform of the American Anti-Imperialist League stated in 1899 “extinguishes the spirit of 1776 in these island”, clarifying that the values of independence in America should be applied for any other nations since we all are born free (Doc. A). In addition, William Jennings Bryan (Doc. D) maintained, if the United States of America annexed the island, they should not let Filipinos read the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution, because the …show more content…

As stated in Beveridge’s article (Doc. B) it was not an option to leave the Philippines alone in the limbo in the hand of the “savage, bloody, rule [Spanish]” arguing that God was the guider of America. Comparatively to the argument claimed by Christian Advocate in 1903 (Doc. C) which “there was nothing else for us to do but take them [...]” affirming the US could not have considered any other options such as (1) to give the Philippines to Spain, (2) to give Philippines back to Germany and France because they were rivals of the US or (3) to not leave them alone or by themselves. Advocate also asserted that God’s grace would do the very best of

Open Document