Anne Bradstreet And Edwards Compare And Contrast

413 Words1 Page

The wrath of God is like Great Waters that are damned for the present. The Puritans believed God would punish them if they disobey him. They were very religious people. Studying several authors’ works from a single time period enables readers to have a better understanding of their way of life. Even though Anne Bradstreet and Jonathan Edwards were both Puritans, their distinctive writings and persuasive tactics differ greatly.

The Puritans are a very religious group. In the sermon “Sinners In The Hands Of An Angry God” Jonathan Edwards tries to persuade the Puritans to follow in the path of God or else they will be severely punished. They believe God will punish them if they disobey him. “And all your righteousness would keep you out of hell” (Edwards 109) They believe God is the almighty and the most powerful. “ The wrath of God is like great waters damned for the present” (Edwards 109) Edwards tells them that god gives people chances to come and praise him for their sins. “And now you have an extraordinary opportunity, a day wherein Christ has thrown the door of mercy wide open, and stand calling and crying with a loud voice to poor sinners.” (Edwards 110) …show more content…

She believes god burned her house down and allowed her husband to die while inside of the house of flames. She loved her husband and her possessions more than God himself. She strongly thinks God allowed this to happen, because she loved her husband more than God. She writes this poem to try to persuade the puritans to not take things for granted, because God can take them away just like he gave it to you. “And to my God my heart did cry, to straighten me in my distress, and to not leave me succourless” (Bradstreet

Open Document